Skip to main content

A Social Network Model of Direct Versus Indirect Reciprocity in a Corrections-Based Therapeutic Community

  • Conference paper
Simulating Interacting Agents and Social Phenomena

Part of the book series: Agent-Based Social Systems ((ABSS,volume 7))

  • 1263 Accesses

Abstract

Therapeutic communities (TCs) for substance abuse depend heavily on mutual aid between residents, who are expected to help each other in attaining recovery. An example of this mutual aid is that residents are expected to affirm each other for actions that are considered helpful in recovery or beneficial to the community. It is unclear how the residents maintain cooperative behavior. In this paper we construct an agent-based model in which affirmations are recorded as directional arcs in a social network. Reception of affirmations can be based on either direct reciprocity, an exchange of aid between two agents, friend of a friend dynamics, in which the exchange extends by one node, or indirect reciprocity, in which helping one agent improves the reputation of the agent who gives help and thereby attracts help from others. We then compare the model results to records of affirmations between residents kept in a TC. We find that indirect reciprocity more closely ­mimics the level of reciprocity and transitivity found in the actual network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489):1390–1396

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Barabasi AL (2002) Linked: the new science of networks. Perseus, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burnett K (2001) Self-help or sink-or-swim? The experience of residents in a UK concept-based therapeutic community. In: Rawlings B, Yates R (eds) Therapeutic communities for the treatment of drug users. Jessica Kingsley, London, England

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Leon G (2000) The therapeutic community: theory, model and method. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppe C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I (2002) Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: a systematic review. Br Med J 324(1183):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein J (2007) Generative social science: studies in agent-based computational modeling. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  8. Falk A (2007) Gift exchange in the field. Econometrica 65(5):1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ Lett 71:397–404

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Harvey C (ed) (2005) Why we do what we do: rationale and theoretical applications for therapeutic community activities in Ohio. Ohio Department of Alcohol and Drug Addiction Services, Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  11. Milinski M, Semmann D, Krambeck H (2002) Donors to charity gain in both indirect ­reciprocity and political reputation. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:881–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller JH, Page SE (2007) Complex adaptive systems: an introduction to computational ­models of social life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Nowak MA (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314:1560–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nowak MA, Roch S (2007) Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274(1610):605–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nowak MA, Sigmund K (2005) Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 437:1291–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rutte C, Taborsky M (2007) Generalized reciprocity in rats. PLoS Biol 5(7):16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Warren K, Harvey C, DeLeon G, Gregoire T (2007) I am my brother’s keeper: affirmations and corrective reminders as predictors of reincarceration following graduation from a corrections-based therapeutic community. Offender Substance Abuse Report 7(3):33–43

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods & applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Wedekind C, Braithwaite VA (2002) The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity. Curr Biol 12:1012–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wedekind C, Milinski M (2000) Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science 288:850–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan Doogan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Doogan, N., Warren, K., Hiance, D., HLinley, J. (2010). A Social Network Model of Direct Versus Indirect Reciprocity in a Corrections-Based Therapeutic Community. In: Takadama, K., Cioffi-Revilla, C., Deffuant, G. (eds) Simulating Interacting Agents and Social Phenomena. Agent-Based Social Systems, vol 7. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99781-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99781-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-99780-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-99781-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics