Abstract
Therapeutic communities (TCs) for substance abuse depend heavily on mutual aid between residents, who are expected to help each other in attaining recovery. An example of this mutual aid is that residents are expected to affirm each other for actions that are considered helpful in recovery or beneficial to the community. It is unclear how the residents maintain cooperative behavior. In this paper we construct an agent-based model in which affirmations are recorded as directional arcs in a social network. Reception of affirmations can be based on either direct reciprocity, an exchange of aid between two agents, friend of a friend dynamics, in which the exchange extends by one node, or indirect reciprocity, in which helping one agent improves the reputation of the agent who gives help and thereby attracts help from others. We then compare the model results to records of affirmations between residents kept in a TC. We find that indirect reciprocity more closely mimics the level of reciprocity and transitivity found in the actual network.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York
Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489):1390–1396
Barabasi AL (2002) Linked: the new science of networks. Perseus, Cambridge, MA
Burnett K (2001) Self-help or sink-or-swim? The experience of residents in a UK concept-based therapeutic community. In: Rawlings B, Yates R (eds) Therapeutic communities for the treatment of drug users. Jessica Kingsley, London, England
De Leon G (2000) The therapeutic community: theory, model and method. Springer, New York
Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppe C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I (2002) Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: a systematic review. Br Med J 324(1183):1–9
Epstein J (2007) Generative social science: studies in agent-based computational modeling. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Falk A (2007) Gift exchange in the field. Econometrica 65(5):1501–1511
Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ Lett 71:397–404
Harvey C (ed) (2005) Why we do what we do: rationale and theoretical applications for therapeutic community activities in Ohio. Ohio Department of Alcohol and Drug Addiction Services, Columbus, OH
Milinski M, Semmann D, Krambeck H (2002) Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:881–883
Miller JH, Page SE (2007) Complex adaptive systems: an introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Nowak MA (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314:1560–1563
Nowak MA, Roch S (2007) Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274(1610):605–609
Nowak MA, Sigmund K (2005) Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 437:1291–1298
Rutte C, Taborsky M (2007) Generalized reciprocity in rats. PLoS Biol 5(7):16–21
Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57
Warren K, Harvey C, DeLeon G, Gregoire T (2007) I am my brother’s keeper: affirmations and corrective reminders as predictors of reincarceration following graduation from a corrections-based therapeutic community. Offender Substance Abuse Report 7(3):33–43
Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods & applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wedekind C, Braithwaite VA (2002) The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity. Curr Biol 12:1012–1015
Wedekind C, Milinski M (2000) Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science 288:850–852
Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Doogan, N., Warren, K., Hiance, D., HLinley, J. (2010). A Social Network Model of Direct Versus Indirect Reciprocity in a Corrections-Based Therapeutic Community. In: Takadama, K., Cioffi-Revilla, C., Deffuant, G. (eds) Simulating Interacting Agents and Social Phenomena. Agent-Based Social Systems, vol 7. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99781-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99781-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-99780-1
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-99781-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)