Skip to main content

Assessing the Impact of Autocorrelation in Misleading Signals in Simultaneous Residual Schemes for the Process Mean and Variance: A Stochastic Ordering Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 10

Part of the book series: Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control ((FSQC,volume 10))

Abstract

Misleading signals (MS) correspond to the misinterpretation of a shift in the process mean (variance) as a shift in the process variance (mean). MS occur when:

  • The individual chart for the mean triggers a signal before the one for the variance, even though the process mean is on-target and the variance is off-target;

  • The individual chart for the variance triggers a signal before the one for the mean, although the variance is in-control and the process mean is out-of-control.

MS can lead to a misdiagnosis of assignable causes and to incorrect actions to bring the process back to target. Unsurprisingly, the performance assessment of simultaneous schemes for the process mean and variance requires not only the use of run length (RL) related performance measures, but also the probability of misleading signals (PMS). We assess the impact of autocorrelation on the PMS of simultaneous Shewhart and EWMA residual schemes for the mean and variance of stationary AR(1), AR(2) and ARMA(1,1) processes. This assessment is done by means of some stochastic ordering results and some illustrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antunes, C. (2009). Avaliação do impacto da correlação em sinais erróneos de esquemas de conjuntos para o valor esperado e variância (Assessment of the impact of the correlation on misleading signals in joint schemes for the mean and variance). Master’s thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brockwell, P. J., & Davis, R. A. (1991). Time series: Theory and methods. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brook, D., & Evans, D. A. (1972). An approach to the probability distribution of CUSUM run length. Biometrika,59, 539–549.

    Google Scholar 

  4. St. John, R. C., & Bragg, D. J. (1991). Joint X-bar R charts under shift in mu or sigma. ASQC Quality Congress Transactions – Milwaukee,45, 547–550.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knoth, S., & Schmid, W. (2002). Monitoring the mean and the variance of a stationary process. Statistica Neerlandica,56, 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knoth, S., Morais, M. C., Pacheco, A., & Schmid, W. (2009). Misleading signals in simultaneous residual schemes for the mean and variance of a stationary process. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods,38, 2923–2943.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mathai, A. M., & Provost, S. B. (1992). Quadratic forms in random variables. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morais, M. J. C. (2002). Stochastic ordering in the performance analysis of quality control schemes. Ph.D. thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Morais, M. C., & Pacheco, A. (1998). Two stochastic properties of one-sided exponentially weighted moving average control charts. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation,27, 937–952.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morais, M. C., & Pacheco, A. (2000). On the performance of combined EWMA schemes for μ and σ: A Markovian approach. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation,29, 153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morais, M. C., & Pacheco, A. (2006). Misleading signals in joint schemes for μ and σ. In H. J. Lenz & P. T. Wilrich (Eds.), Frontiers in statistical quality control (Vol. 8, pp. 100–102). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramos, P. F., Morais, M. C., & Pacheco, A. (2010). Misleading signals in simultaneous residual schemes for the process mean and variance of AR(1) processes: A stochastic ordering approach (submited for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reynolds, M. R., Jr., & Stoumbos, Z. G. (2001). Monitoring the process mean and variance using individual observations and variable sampling intervals. Journal of Quality Technology,33, 181–205.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reynolds, M. R., Jr., & Stoumbos, Z. G. (2004). Control charts and the efficient allocation of sampling resources. Technometrics,46, 200–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author is supported by grant SFRH/BD/35739/2007 of Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) and was partially supported by Centro de Matemática e Aplicações (CEMAT) and FCT while visiting the Department of Statistics of the European University Viadrina (Frankfurt (Oder), Germany).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrícia Ferreira Ramos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramos, P.F., Morais, M.C., Pacheco, A., Schmid, W. (2012). Assessing the Impact of Autocorrelation in Misleading Signals in Simultaneous Residual Schemes for the Process Mean and Variance: A Stochastic Ordering Approach. In: Lenz, HJ., Schmid, W., Wilrich, PT. (eds) Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 10. Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control, vol 10. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2846-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics