Skip to main content

Where Question, Conditionals and Topics Converge

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7218))

Abstract

One puzzling fact about German is that yes-no questions that surface as verb-first structures can be interpreted as conditionals in a topic position. We provide an analysis using the basic idea of inquisitive semantics that questions and assertions can be treated on a par as denoting sets of possibilities. The key assumption is that in topic position, questions can be interpreted as conditionals if and only if they contain exactly one highlighted alternative possibility. The analysis correctly predicts the distribution of wh-questions and the distribution of so called irrelevance-conditionals containing auch (‘too’) as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brasoveanu, A., Farkas, D., Roelofsen, F.: Polarity particles and the anatomy of n-words. In: Proceedings of SUB 12, Utrecht (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Büring, D.: The meaning of topic and focus: the 59th Street Bridge accent. Routledge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Büring, D.: On B-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics & Philosophy 26(5), 511–545 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciardelli, I.: Inquisitive semantics and intermediate logics. Master’s thesis. University of Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Attention! Might in inquisitive semantics. In: Cormany, E., Ito, S., Lutz, D. (eds.) Proceedings of SALT 2009, pp. 91–108. OSU (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ebert, C., Endriss, C., Hinterwimmer, S.: Topics as speech acts: An analysis of conditionals. In: Abner, N., Bishop, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 27), Sommerville, MA, Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 132–140 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Endriss, C.: Quantificational topics - A scopal treatment of exceptional wide scope phenomena. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frey, W.: A medial topic position for German. In: Linguistische Berichte, pp. 153–190 (2004a)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frey, W.: Notes on the syntax and the pragmatics of German left dislocation. In: Lohnstein, H., Trissler, S. (eds.) The syntax and semantics of the left periphery, pp. 203–233. Mouton de Gruyter (2004b)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. Manuscript University of Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, C.: Contrastive topic/focus and polarity in discourse. In: von Heusinger, K., Turner, K. (eds.) Where semantics meets pragmatics. CRiSPI, vol. 16, pp. 381–429. Elsevier (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals. Harward University Press (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lohnstein, H.: Satzmodus - kompositionell. Akademie Verlag, Berlin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pruitt, K., Roelofsen, F.: Prosody, syntax and semantics of disjunctive polar questions. Manuscript University of Massachusetts Amherst and University of Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roelofsen, F., van Gool, S.: Disjunctive Questions, Intonation, and Highlighting. In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds.) Logic, Language and Meaning. LNCS, vol. 6042, pp. 384–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Schlenker, P.: Conditionals as definite descriptions (a referential analysis). Research on Language and Computation 2(3), 417–462 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Truckenbrodt, H.: On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to C in German. Theoretical Linguistics 32(3), 257–306 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Onea, E., Steinbach, M. (2012). Where Question, Conditionals and Topics Converge. In: Aloni, M., Kimmelman, V., Roelofsen, F., Sassoon, G.W., Schulz, K., Westera, M. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7218. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31481-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31482-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics