Abstract
In this chapter an analytical framework is developed for conceptualisation and analysis of the interplay between innovation and workplace learning. By introducing the concepts of preject and project as arenas for the innovation process and by pointing out some important differences in these arenas, this chapter mainly directs attention to the less developed and discussed concept of preject. Learning theory is examined from the perspective of the individual in his or her social setting, and the concepts of innovative learning, adaptive learning, and reproductive learning are introduced and discussed. By relating these concepts to a problem matrix developed by Darsø (2001), we are able to, firstly, differentiate between preject, problem solving, and project, and, secondly, associate innovative learning, adaptive learning, and reproductive learning with the above-mentioned corresponding arenas. The chapter concludes with a figure displaying the framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Named after Henry Gantt (1861–1919), who invented it.
- 2.
In Figure 8.4 minus indicates: not knowing (the problem or solution). Plus indicates: knowing (the problem or the solution).
References
Austin, R., & Darsø, L. (2009). Innovation processes and closure. In N. Koivunen & A. Rehn (Eds.), Creativity and the contemporary economy (pp. 55–81). Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Billett, S. (2004). Workplace participatory practices. Conceptualizing workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(6), 312–324.
Botkin, J. W., Elmandjra, M., & Malitza, M. (1979). No Limits to Learning: Bridging the Human Gap, A Report to the Club of Rome. Exeter, UK: A. Wheaton and Co. Ltd.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Cicmil, S., Hodgson, D., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2009). Project management behind the facade. Ephemera, 9(2), 78–92.
Cooper, R. G. (1986). Winning at new products. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.
Currie, W. (1994). The strategic management of a large scale IT project in the financial service sector. New Technology, Work and Employment, 9(1), 19–29.
Darsø, L. (2001). Innovation in the making. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.
Darsø, L. (2003). Findes der en formel for innovation? [Is there a Formula for Innovation?]. Børsen Ledelseshåndbøger: Innovations- og Forandringsledelse. Copenhagen: Børsen Forum A/S. (In Danish.)
Dewey, J. (1997). How we think. Mineola, New York: Dover.
Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles. London: Pan Books.
Ellström, P.-E. (2010). Practice-based innovation: a learning perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 27–40.
Fenwick, T. (2008). Understanding relations of individual-collective learning at work: A review of research. Management Learning, 39(3), 227–243.
Fitzgerald, L., & Van Eijnatten, F. (2002). Chaos speak: A glossary of chaordic terms and phrases. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(4), 412–423.
Geraldi, J. G., Turner, J. R., Maylor, H., Söderholm, A., Hobday, M., & Brady, T. (2008). Innovation in project management: voices of researcher. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 586–589.
Goldman, E., Plack, M., Roche, C., Smith, J., & Turley, C. (2009). Learning in a chaotic environment. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(7), 555–574.
Hargadon, A. B. (2002). Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 41–85.
Herbst, P. G. (1977). Alternativ til hierarkisk organisasjon [An alternative to hierarchical organisation]. Oslo: Tanjum-Norli. (In Norwegian.)
Illeris, K. (2006). How we learn. Learning and non-learning in school and beyond. London and New York: Routledge.
Isaksen, S. G. (1988). Innovative problem solving in groups. New methods and research opportunities. In Y. Ijiri, & R. L. Kuhn (Eds.), New directions in creative and innovative management. Bridging theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Jarvis, P. (2006). Towards a comprehensive theory of human learning. Lifelong learning and the learning society (Vol. 1). London and New York: Routledge.
Lundin, R. A., & Söderholm, A. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437–455.
Maylor, H. (2001). Beyond the Gantt chart: project management moving on. European Management Journal, 19(1), 92–100.
Packendorff, J. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 319–333.
Pine, B. J. I., & Gilmore, J. H. (1996). The experience economy. Work is theatre & every business a stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W. G. (1965). Personal and organizational change through group methods. New York: Wiley.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1986). What we know about the creative process. In R. L. Kuhn (Ed.), Frontiers in creative and innovative management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Takeuchi, H., & Nonaka, I. (1986). The new product development game. Harvard Business Review, 64, 137–146.
Thomas, J. (2000). Making sense of project management. In R. A. Lundin, & F. Hartman (Eds.), Projects as Business Constituents and Guiding Motives. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
Van de Ven, A. H., Angle, H. L., & Poole, M. S. (Eds.). (1989). Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, Ballinger Division.
Van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Van Eijnatten, F., & Putnik, G. D. (2004). Chaos, complexity, learning, and the learning organization. Towards a chaordic enterprise. The Learning Organization, 11(6), 418–129.
Vogt, E. E., Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2003). The art of powerful questions; catalyzing insight, innovation, and action. Mill Valley, CA: Whole Systems Associates.
Ward, A., Liker, J. K., Cristiano, J. J., & Sobek, D. K., II. (1995). The second Toyota paradox: How delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan Management Review, 36, 43–61 (Spring).
Weick, K. E., & Westley, F. (1996). Organizational learning: Affirming an oxymoron. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 440–458). London: Sage.
Williams, T. (2004). Assessing and building on the underlying theory of project management in the light of badly over-run projects. Paper presented at PMI Research Conference, London, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Darsø, L., Høyrup, S. (2012). Developing a Framework for Innovation and Learning in the Workplace. In: Melkas, H., Harmaakorpi, V. (eds) Practice-Based Innovation: Insights, Applications and Policy Implications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21723-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21723-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21722-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21723-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)