Skip to main content

From the Artists to the Managers: Responsible Collective Innovation Practices, Inspiration Flowing Through Hosting and Harvesting Profound Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practice-Based Innovation: Insights, Applications and Policy Implications
  • 1815 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to demonstrate how the artists can inspire a collective process supporting and leading to practice-based innovation. The underlying hypothesis is that enabling innovation through art is a powerful means to foster practice-based innovation. After having presented innovation as new situated knowledge, relevant at a micro-level work process activity, the concept of ba is brought forward to describe organisational contexts that invite, sustain, and foster innovation. The Art of Hosting and Harvesting are then presented as appropriate collective facilitation and information gathering processes to nurture innovation. Considering innovation as knowledge emerging from collective intelligence, two cases illustrate how collective intelligence can be nurtured by artistic practices. The results are focused on the specifics of the principles and practices at work, which are creative, artistic, playful, sensible, involving concerns for ethics and aesthetics, and helpful in creating meaningful experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    More accurately, the report underlines that ‘according to Philips, only 20% of the outcome from Philips’ R&D department has recently formed the basis for innovation in the company. […] Hence, it is not surprising that the future role of R&D departments is under evaluation.’ (p. 60).

  2. 2.

    Ibid.

  3. 3.

    Idem. The authors’ injunctions are clear: ‘In the future, companies will need to become more open; i.e. to learn from their customers, collaborate with others and assume greater social responsibility. If they fail to do so, they will not survive. While companies will still optimise their business, globalisation and the digital technology have changed the rules of the game.’ (p. 9).

  4. 4.

    Idem, p. 13.

  5. 5.

    Co-creation is referred to as ‘co-production’ of knowledge, in Boyle et al. (2010).

  6. 6.

    Ibid, p. 9.

  7. 7.

    The five characteristics are described in detail here: http://www.dialogonleadership.org/WhitePaper.html

  8. 8.

    A subset of public information displayed by Cirque du Soleil on their website as of January 2011.

  9. 9.

    For further details, see Scharmer (2007: 366–367).

  10. 10.

    http://www.artofhosting.org/theart/

  11. 11.

    http://www.artofhosting.org/thepractice/coremethods/

  12. 12.

    http://www.artofhosting.org/thepractice/5breaths/

  13. 13.

    In this case, the Art of Hosting authors provide no information to inform of any wise action. I suggest deep presence (Mahy 2006) and sensing from the whole field as mandatory states of being to support the practice.

  14. 14.

    The author wishes to thank Caroline Durand for her very active contribution to this study, as a member of the hosting team and as a graduate student completing her master’s degree in communication at Université du Québec à Montréal on participatory practices. The Montreal event was her fieldwork.

References

  • Arthur, W. B., et al. (2000). Illuminating the blind spot: Leadership in the context of emerging worlds, 20 propositions based on conversations among the authors and dialogue-interviews with thought leaders on knowledge and leadership. Summary paper on an ongoing research project. McKinsey—Society for Organizational Learning (SoL) leadership project. http://www.dialogonleadership.org/WhitePaper.html. Accessed 31 January 2011.

  • Baldwin, C., & Linnea, A. (2010). The circle way: A leader in every chair. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, D., Coote, A., Sherwood, C., & Slay, J. (2010). Right here, right now. NESTA: Taking co-production into the mainstream. Discussion paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broussine, M. (2008). Creative methods in organizational research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The world café: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, (Winter). Stanford, CA: Stanford Graduate School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirque du Soleil website. http://www.cirquedusoleil.com. Accessed 31 January 2011.

  • Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (2000). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In D. L. Cooperrider, P. F. Sorensen Jr., D. Whitney, & T. F. Jaeger (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry: Rethinking human organization toward a positive theory of change (pp. 55–97). Champaign: Stipes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszenmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow, the psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P.-E. (2010). Practice-based innovation: A learning perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrido, P. (2009). Business sustainability and collective intelligence. The Learning Organization, 16(3), 208–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2009). Knowing and learning in practice-based studies: An introduction. The Learning Organization, Special issue, 16(5), 352–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillet de Monthoux, P. (2004). The art firm. Aesthetics management and metaphysical marketing from Wagner to Wilson. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmaakorpi, V., & Mutanen, A. (2008). Knowledge production in networked practice-based innovation processes – interrogative model as a methodological approach. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 3, 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, J. G., & Cole, A. L. (2008). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research, perspectives, methodologies, examples and issues. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahy, I. (2010). Practicing the 3rd eye: Reflexion on a collective visual harvesting process. Paper presented at the 28th Standing Conference on Organization Symbolism, Lille, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahy, I. (2008). Les coulisses de l’innovation. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahy, I. (2006). Le rôle de la présence créatrice dans le processus d'innovation. 74e Congrès de l’ACFAS (Association francophone pour le savoir), 15–19 mai, Montréal, Québec. http://www.archipel.uqam.ca/378/. Accessed 30 January 2011.

  • Mahy, I. (2005). Innovation, artistes et managers, ethnographie du Cirque du Soleil. Thèse de doctorat. Montréal: Faculté des Études Supérieures, Université de Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, M., & Corrigan, C. (2009). The Art of Harvesting (2nd ed.). http://www.artofhosting.org/thepractice/artofharvesting. Accessed 31 January 2011.

  • Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ‘Ba’: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010). The OECD innovation strategy: getting a head start on tomorrow – OECD executive summary report on innovation. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009). New Nature of Innovation. Copenhagen: OECD. www.newnatureofinnovation.org. Accessed 31 January 2011.

  • Owen, H. (1997). Open space technology: A user’s guide. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penalva, J.-M. (2006). Intelligence collective: Rencontres 2006. École des mines d'Alès du 22 au 24 mai 2006. Paris: Presses de l'École des mines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnik, G. D. (2009). Complexity framework for sustainability: An analysis of five papers. The Learning Organization, 16(3), 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharmer, C. O. (2007). Theory U – leading from the future as it emerges. The social technology of presencing. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning (SoL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M., et al. (2004). Presence: Human purpose and the field of the future. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Art of Hosting practice website. http://www.artofhosting.org/home/. Accessed 31 January 2011.

  • The InterChange website on hosting and harvesting practices. http://www.interchange.dk/practices/. Accessed 31 January 2011.

  • van Eijnatten, F. M., & Putnik, G. D. (2004). Chaordic systems thinking for learning organizations. The Learning Organization, 11(6), 415–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schiller, F. (1992). Lettres sur l’éducation esthétique de l’homme, Briefe über die ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen. Paris: Aubier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbord, M., & Janoff, S. (2000). Future search – an action guide to finding common ground in organizations & communities (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Mahy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mahy, I. (2012). From the Artists to the Managers: Responsible Collective Innovation Practices, Inspiration Flowing Through Hosting and Harvesting Profound Change. In: Melkas, H., Harmaakorpi, V. (eds) Practice-Based Innovation: Insights, Applications and Policy Implications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21723-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics