Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Justice as a Framework for the Solution of Environmental Conflicts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Justice and Conflicts

Abstract

Debates in environmental conflicts are very often considered as driven by self-interests of the stakeholders and activist groups involved. While they do actually play an important role, there is little convergence as to what can be understood as a self-interests. Moreover, their importance for motivating behavior in the course of conflict resolution is largely over-estimated by respondents. It is argued that behavior in ecological conflicts is driven by feelings of justice and injustice. Those feelings can differ largely depending on individual scopes of justice, values, needs, and feelings of attachment to nature and the environment. Research from justice psychology provides important insights in how these differences in justice perceptions occur and how they influence behavioral decisions and commitment. A justice framework is proposed as a tool to analyze and solve ecological conflicts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S. H. (2009). Treasures of the earth: Need, greed, and a sustainable future. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S. H., & Müller, M. M. (2010). Simulating environmental diplomacy. Policy Innovations, June 23, 2010. Retrieved June 30, 2010, from http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/innovations/data/000168

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, M. (2010). Moralische Inklusion, Tierethik und Verhalten [Moral inclusion, animal ethics, and behavior]. Unpublished thesis, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S. (1994). Appeals to justice in the environmental debate. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S. (1996). What is fair in the environmental debate? In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 195–211). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S. (2000). Models of justice in the environmental debate. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 459–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–66). Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S., & Myers, G. (2009). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003). Justice and identity: Changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Carnevale, P. J. (2003). Motivational bases of information processing and strategy in conflict and negotiation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 235–291). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1990). Psychological roots of moral exclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Coleman, P. T. (2000). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutcher, T. S., Finley, J. C., Luloff, A. E., & Johnson, J. B. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39, 474–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., & Kezebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Ginzley (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797–832). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittner, H., & Montada, L. (2009). Gerechtigkeit und Umweltpolitik [Justice and environmental politics]. Umweltpsychologie, 13, 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E., & Müller, M. M. (in press). Emotions and the environment. In S. Clayton (Ed.), Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E., & Russell, Y. (2001). Individual conceptions of justice and their potential for explaining pro-environmental decision making. Social Justice Research, 14, 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E., Syme, G. J., Kärcher, J. D., Müller, M. M., & Nancarrow, B. E. (2004–2005). Community views of fairness in environmental conflicts: Evidence from Germany and Australia. Journal of Environmental Systems, 31, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (2007). Justice conflicts and the justice of conflict resolution. In K. Törnblom & R. Vermunt (Eds.), Distributive and procedural justice (pp. 255–268). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., & Kals, E. (1995). Perceived justice of ecological policy and pro-environmental commitments. Social Justice Research, 8, 305–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., & Kals, E. (2000). Political implications of psychological research on ecological justice and pro-environmental behaviors. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 168–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., & Kals, E. (2007). Mediation: Ein Lehrbuch auf psychologischer Grundlage [Mediation: A textbook based on psychology]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz PVU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. M. (2003). Bedingungen der Konfliktlösung: Eine gerechtigkeitspsychologische Untersuchung am Beispiel eines lokalen Umweltkonflikts [Conditions of conflict settlement: A justice-psychological study of a local environmental conflict]. Hamburg, Germany: Dr. Kovac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. M., & Hiendl, B. (submitted). Justice perceptions and willingness for commitments to protect the global climate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. M., Maier, K., & Kals, E. (in press). Klimaschützendes Handeln im Haushalt: Die Rolle von emotionaler Bindung an die Natur [Climate-protective behavior in the household: The role of emotional attachment to nature]. Umweltpsychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. M., & Kals, E. (2007). Interactions between procedural fairness and outcome favorability in conflict situations. In K. Y. Törnblom & R. Vermunt (Eds.), Distributive and procedural justice (pp. 125–140). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. M., Kals, E., & Maes, J. (2008). Fairness, self-interest, and cooperation in a real-life conflict. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 684–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. M., Kals, E., & Pansa, R. (2009). Adolescents’ emotional affinity toward nature: A cross-societal study. Journal of Developmental Processes, 4, 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. (1994). Predicting protection: Scope of justice and the natural world. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. (1996). Is justice finite? The case of environmental inclusion. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 213–229). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In J. P. Rushton & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 189–211). Hillsdale, IN: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). A brief inventory of values. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 984–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, K. (2005). What is responsible for the fair process effect? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 273–300). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany

    Markus M. Müller

Authors
  1. Markus M. Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus M. Müller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Professur Psychologie III, Katholische Universität, Ostenstrasse 25, Ingolstadt, 85072, Germany

    Elisabeth Kals

  2. Fakultät für Pädagogik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, Neubiberg, 85577, Germany

    Jürgen Maes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Müller, M.M. (2011). Justice as a Framework for the Solution of Environmental Conflicts. In: Kals, E., Maes, J. (eds) Justice and Conflicts. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19034-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19035-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation