Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Behavioral Operations in Planning and Scheduling pp 83–104Cite as

Collaborative Planning in Supply Chains: The Importance of Creating High Quality Relationships

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 2711 Accesses

Abstract

While collaborative planning and relationship quality are considered key contributors to supply chain performance, their mechanisms and linkages remain unclear. In order to help address this issue this book chapter introduces and unpacks the concepts of collaborative planning and relationship quality and investigates their role in supply chains. A multidisciplinary literature review was undertaken to identify conceptual and empirical work on relationship quality and collaborative planning. The chapter reveals a number of shortcomings in the literature and provides suggestions to guide future research on the links between collaborative planning, relationship quality, and supply chain performance. Implications are also provided for practitioners interested in enhancing the quality of interorganizational relationships and collaborative planning in supply chains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, P. S. (1995). Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organization Science, 6(2), 147–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariño, A., & De la Torre, J. (1998). Learning from failure: Towards an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures. Organization Science, 9(3), 306–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariño, A., De la Torre, J., & Ring, P. S. (2001). Relational quality: Managing trust in corporate alliances. California Management Review, 44, 109–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi, P. K., Chun, B., Skjoett-Larsen, T., & Soerensen, L. B. (2005). Supply chain integration: European survey. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(2), 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, M. (2003). Positioning the role of collaborative planning in grocery supply chains. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 14(2), 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, M. (2004). Unveiling enablers and inhibitors of collaborative planning. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, M., & Oliveira, A. (2001). Exploring the experiences of collaborative planning initiatives. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 266–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B., & Crant, J. M. (2000). Dyadic communication relationships in organizations: an attribution/expectancy approach. Organization Science, 11, 648–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batonda, G., & Perry, C. (2003). Approaches to relationship development processes in inter-firm networks. European Journal of Marketing, 37(10), 1457–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J., den Ouden, B., & Ziggers, G. W. (2006). Dynamics of cooperation: at the brink of irrelevance. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1607–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., Koen, C. I., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (2006). Organizational culture and relationship skills. Organization Studies, 27, 833–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluedorn, A. C. (2002). The human organization of time: Temporal realities and experience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boles, J. S., Johnson, J. T., & Barksdale, H. C. (2000). How salespeople build quality relationships: a replication and extension. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. (1999). Managing supply chain variability with scheduled ordering policies. Management Science, 45(6), 843–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G., & Lariviere, M. (1999). Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance. Management Science, 45(8), 1091–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F., Drezner, Z., Ryan, J. K., & Simchi-Levi, D. (1998). The bullwhip effect: Managerial insights on the impact of forecasting and information on variability in a supply chain. In S. Tayur, R. Ganeshan, & M. Magazine (Eds.), Quantitative models for supply chain management. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic. Chapter 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F., Drezner, Z., Ryan, J. K., & Simchi-Levi, D. (2000). Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: the impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Science, 46(3), 436–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (1998). Logistics and supply chain management. London: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, W. W. C., & Leung, S. W. F. (2005). Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment: a case study in copper clad laminate industry. Production Planning and Control, 16(6), 563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling – an interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., Donohue, K., Katok, E., & Sterman, J. (2005). "Order stability in supply chains: coordination risk and the role of coordination stock", MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper No. 4513-04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., & Donohue, D. (2006). Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Science, 52(3), 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danese, P. (2006). Collaboration forms, information and communication technologies, and coordination mechanisms in CPFR. International Journal of Production Research, 44(16), 3207–3226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danese, P. (2007). Designing CPFR collaborations: insights from seven case studies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(2), 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo, C. F. (2004). On the stability of supply chains. Operations Research, 52(6), 909–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Snoo, C., Wortmann, J. C., Gaalman, G. J. C., & Van Wezel, W. (2007a). Decomposition of the planning function implies coordination of planners. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of the European Operations Management Association (EurOMA 2007). 17–20 June 2007, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Snoo, C., Moscoso, P., Günter, H., Shepherd, C., Riedel, J. (2007b). Relationship quality and collaborative planning: an interdisciplinary review. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of the European Operations Management Association (EurOMA 2007). 17–20 June 2007, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudek, G., & Stadtler, H. (2005). Negotiation-based collaborative planning between supply chains partners: Supply chain management and advanced planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 163(3), 668–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fynes, B., De Burca, S., & Mangan, J. (2008). The effect of relationship characteristics on relationship quality and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(1), 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fynes, B., de Burca, S., & Voss, C. (2005a). Supply chain relationship quality, the competitive environment and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 43(16), 3303–3320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fynes, B., Voss, C., & de Burca, S. (2005b). The impact of supply chain relationship dynamics on manufacturing performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(1), 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fynes, B., Voss, C., & de Burca, S. (2005c). The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(3), 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. (2007). Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 32–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Canal, E., Valdes-Llaneza, A., & Ariño, A. (2003). Effectiveness of dyadic and multi-party joint ventures. Organization Studies, 24(5), 743–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffin, K., Lemke, F., & Szwejczewski, M. (2006). An exploratory study of 'close' supplier-manufacturer relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günter, H. (2007). Collaborative planning in heterarchic supply networks, PhD Thesis, ETH Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günter, H., Shepherd, C., Moscoco, P., De Snoo, C., & Riedel, J. (2007). Unpacking relationship quality in supply chains: An interdisciplinary review. In S. Karwowski & S. Trzcielinski, (Eds.) Value Stream Activities Management – Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing Agility and Hybrid Automation (HAAMAHA 2007) (pp. 229–239). 9–12 July 2007, Poznan, Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günter, H., Grote, G., & Thees, O. (2006). Information technology in supply networks: Does it lead to better collaborative planning? Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19(5), 540–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günter, H., Shepherd, C., Moscoco, P., De Snoo, C., & Riedel, J. (2009). Understanding relationship quality and its link with supply chain performance – a review. In K. S. Pawar & C. S. Lalwani (Eds.) Global supply chains and inter-firm networks – Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Logistics (ISL 2009) (pp. 508–516). 5–8 July 2009, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, W. (1998). Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie: psychische Regulation von Arbeitstätigkeiten. Bern: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, R. B., & Bechtel, C. (2002). The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(4), 367–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, R. B., & Nichols, E. L. (1999). Introduction to supply chain management. Upper Saddle River, NY: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T. (2000). Relationship quality and customer retention through strategic communication of customer skills. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(1), 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002). Understanding relationship marketing outcomes: An Integration of relational benefits and relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 4(3), 230–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, K. R., Money, B., & Sharma, S. (2002). An exploration of the moderating role of buyer corporate culture in industrial buyer–seller relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P., & Wright, G. (2002). Confronting strategic inertia in a top management team: Learning from failure. Organization Studies, 23, 949–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, J. K. (2006). Conceptualization and measurement of relationship quality: Linking relationship quality to actual sales and recommendation intention. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(6), 703–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jap, S. D. (1999). Pie-expansion efforts: Collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(4), 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jap, S. D., & Anderson, E. (2007). Testing alife-cycle theory of cooperative inter-organizational relationships: Movement across stages and performance. Management Science, 53(2), 260–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilger, C., & Reuter, B. (2002). Collaborative planning. In H. Stadler & C. Kilger (Eds.), Supply chain management and advanced planning: concepts, models, software and case studies (pp. 223–237). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. (1996). The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships. Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J. E. (1995). The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagace, R. R., Dahlstrom, R., & Gassenheimer, J. B. (1991). The relevance of ethical salesperson behavior on relationship quality: The pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 11(4), 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lages, C., Lages, C. R., & Lages, L. F. (2005). The RELQUAL scale: A measure of relationship quality in export market ventures. Journal of Business Research, 58(8), 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. M., James, R., & Ellram, L. M. (1998). Fundamentals of logistics management. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43(4), 546–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L., & Billington, C. (1992). Managing supply chain inventory: Pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, L. C., Barnes, B. R., & Talias, M. A. (2006). Exporter–importer relationship quality: The inhibiting role of uncertainty, distance and conflict. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(5), 576–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leudar, I., & Costall, A. (1996). Situating action IV: Planning as situated action. Ecological Psychology, 8, 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuthesser, L. (1997). Supplier relational behaviour: An empirical assessment. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(3), 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J., & Choi, T. H. (2004). Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Business Review, 82(12), 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loch, C., & Terwiesch, C. (1998). Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Science, 44(8), 1032–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loch, C. H., & Terwiesch, C. (2005). Rush and be wrong or wait and be late? A model of information in collaborative processes. Production and Operations Management, 14(3), 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M. J., & Benton, W. C. (1997). Supply chain partnerships: Opportunities for operations research. European Journal of Operational Research, 101(3), 419–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., & Schulze, W. (2006). The influence of team knowledge and formal plans on episodic team processes-performance relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 605–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. (1960). Plans and the structures of behaviour. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, V. L., & Nault, B. R. (2007). Cooperative planning, uncertainty, and managerial control in concurrent design. Management Science, 53(3), 375–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Osburn, H. K. (2002). Planning in organizations: performance as a multi-level phenomenon. Annual Review of Research in Multi-Level Issues, 1, 3–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naude, P., & Buttle, F. (2000). Assessing relationship quality. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(4), 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhuis, M. J., Mollemann, E., & Van der Vaart, T. (2005). “Multilevel issues in supply chain management. In H. Kotzab, S. Seuring, M. Müller, & G. Reiner (Eds.), Research methodologies in supply chain management (pp. 283–297). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, A., & Kotzab, H. (2003). Does supply chain management really pay? Six perspectives to measure the performance of managing a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(2), 306–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., & Grewal, D. (2007). A comparative longitudinal analysis of theoretical perspectives of interorganizational relationship performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, A. L. (2002). What determines buyer–seller relationship quality? an investigation from the buyer's perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(2), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, K., Ragatz, G., & Monczka, R. (2005). An examination of collaborative planning effectiveness and supply chain performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(2), 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poundarikapuram, S., & Veeramani, D. (2004). Distributed decision-making in supply chains and private e-marketplaces. Production and Operations Management Journal, 13(1), 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramdas, K., & Spekman, R. E. (2000). Chain or shackles: Understanding what drives supply chain performance. Interfaces, 30(4), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosson, P. J., & Ford, I. D. (1982). Manufacturer overseas distributor relations and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(2), 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, L. K., Kumar, N., & Steenkamp, J. (2003). Reactions to perceived inequity in US and Dutch inter-organizational relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, D. (2002). Collaborative planning forecasting and replenishment: How to create a supply chain advantage. Kevelaer: Galileo Press GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settoon, R., & Mossholder, K. (2002). Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person- and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, C., & Günter, H. (2006). Measuring supply chain performance: current research and future directions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance, 55(3/4), 242–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B. (1998). Buyer-seller relationships: Similarity, relationship management, and quality. Psychology and Marketing, 15(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sogomonian, A., & Tang, C. (1993). A modeling framework for coordinating promotion and production decisions within a firm. Management Science, 39(2), 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (1989). Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science, 35(3), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storbacka, K., Strandvik, T., & Gronroos, C. (1994). Managing customer relationships for profit – the dynamics of relationship quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 5(5), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human–machine reconfigurations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapiero, C. S. (2001). Yield and control in a supplier-customer relationship. International Journal of Production Research, 39(7), 1505–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terwiesch, C., Ren, Z. J., Ho, T. H., & Cohen, M. A. (2005). An empirical analysis of forecast sharing in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Management Science, 51(2), 208–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., & Walker, A. (1982). The dyad as a unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 889–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toni, A. D., & Nassimbeni, G. (1999). Buyer-supplier operational practices, sourcing policies and plant performances: results of an empirical research. International Journal of Production Research, 37(3), 597–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vaart, T., & Van Donk, D. P. (2008). A critical review of survey-based research in supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(1), 42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van De Ven, A. H., Delbecq, L. A., & Koenig, R. J. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 322–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wezel, W. M. C. (2001). Tasks, hierarchies, and flexibility; planning in food processing industries. PhD Thesis, University of Groningen, Labyrinth Publications, Capelle a/d IJssel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramani, V., & Dalal, R. S. (2007). Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 952–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A., Muller, T. A., Helfert, G., & Ritter, T. (2003). Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(2), 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Jingdong, J., & Takahashi, K. (2005). A study on the impact of uncertain factors on information distortion in supply chains. Production Planning & Control, 16(1), 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, L. R. (1992). Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 682–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, D., & Leidner, D. (2006). Bringing IT back: An analysis of the decision to backsource or switch vendors. Decision Sciences, 37(4), 605–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windischer, W., & Grote, G. (2003). Success factors for collaborative planning. In S. Seuring, M. Muller, M. Goldbach, & U. Schneidewind (Eds.), Strategy and organization in supply chains (pp. 129–146). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windischer, A., Grote, G., Mathier, F., Meunier Martins, S., & Glardon, R. (2008). Characteristics and organizational constraints of collaborative planning. Cognition Technology and Work, 11(2), 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, K., & Ennew, C. T. (2004). Business-to-business relationship quality: An IMP interaction-based conceptualization and measurement. European Journal of Marketing, 38(9/10), 1252–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Parts of this chapter have been presented during the 14th International EurOMA Conference 2007 in Ankara, Turkey (see De Snoo et al. 2007b), the 11th International HAAMAHA Conference 2007 in Poznan, Poland (see Günter et al. 2007), and the 14th International Symposium on Logistics 2009 in Istanbul, Turkey (see Günter et al. 2009). We thank reviewers and participants for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Organization and Strategy, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Hannes Günter

  2. Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Cees De Snoo

  3. Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, UK

    Craig Shepherd & Johann Riedel

  4. IESE Business School, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

    Philip Moscoso

Authors
  1. Hannes Günter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cees De Snoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Craig Shepherd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Philip Moscoso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Johann Riedel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannes Günter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. BETA Research School, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 5600 MB, Netherlands

    Jan C. Fransoo

  2. Northwestern Switzerland, School of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences, Riggenbachstrasse 16, Olten, 4600, Switzerland

    Toni Waefler

  3. , Human Factors Group, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

    John R. Wilson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Günter, H., De Snoo, C., Shepherd, C., Moscoso, P., Riedel, J. (2010). Collaborative Planning in Supply Chains: The Importance of Creating High Quality Relationships. In: Fransoo, J., Waefler, T., Wilson, J. (eds) Behavioral Operations in Planning and Scheduling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13382-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation