Abstract
In this chapter we discuss a rather different methodology for retrieving SQC models: not directly from N = 1 SUGRA (and therefore involving a dimensional reduction towards an N = 4 SUSY minisuperspace), but instead in an opposite direction, starting from purely bosonic configurations (e.g., general relativity and the bosonic sectors of string theories) and then building (in a consistent manner!) a minisuperspace with N = 2 SUSY, which is the simplest case [1–8].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Whose formal expressions bear interesting similarities with those in Chap. 5.
- 2.
For example, for the expression in (6.2), we need (see footnote 15 in Sect. 2.3.1)
$$\beta_{1} \equiv \beta^{0} - 2\beta^{+}\,,$$((6.3))$$\beta_{2} \equiv \beta^{0} + \beta^{+} + \sqrt{3}\beta^{-}\,,$$((6.4))$$\beta_{3} \equiv \beta^{0} + \beta^{+} - \sqrt{3}\beta^{-}\,,$$((6.5))and of course,
$$\beta^{0} \equiv \pm \Omega = \pm \ln a = \pm \alpha\,,$$((6.6))for the Misner–Ryan time coordinate choice(s) [15].
- 3.
Note that this feature seems to influence the form of the quantum supersymmetry constraints, as will be made clear in subsequent sections.
- 4.
Ω is employed for time coordinate in the ADM parametrization, whereas \(\tilde{\Omega}\) is the conformal factor function.
- 5.
At this stage, the reader might find it useful to glance through Sect. 3.3 of Vol. II. In fact, most of what follows here concerns a supersymmetric extension of particle motion in a potential well, i.e., supersymmetric quantum mechanics (SQM).
- 6.
Perhaps a quick glance at (6.42) may help to illustrate this point.
- 7.
It is sufficient to examine the case \(\widetilde{\Omega}(q)=0\), where the metric \({\mathcal{G}}_{XY}\left(={\mathcal{G}}_{XY}^{(0)} \right)\) is flat, and U(q) is given by \(U^{(0)}(q)\) (see Exercise 6.1).
- 8.
They do indeed constitute (N = 2) SUSY generators or (local) gauge constraints.
- 9.
X,Y correspond to minisuperspace variables and we employ x,y for the corresponding variables in the corresponding tangent space.
- 10.
When Λ = 0, we recover the analysis in Exercise 6.2. In fact, for \(\alpha\rightarrow-\infty\), near the initial singularity, the cosmological constant term is negligible and we get \({\mathsf{B}}_1\rightarrow \textrm{e}^{-{\mathsf{W}}}\), \({\mathsf{W}}=\textrm{e}^{2\alpha}/2\) with \({\mathsf{B}}_0 \rightarrow 0\). The possibility of B 0 approaching eW can be dealt with in a Bianchi IX setting (of which the FRW is a special case). If we require Ψ not to diverge for \(\beta_\pm \rightarrow\infty\) for fixed α, then it must be excluded. Note that the remaining solution is not then the Hartle–Hawking state, but agrees with a Vilenkin type solution.
- 11.
Also representing the \(\check{d}(\check{d}+1)/2\) modulus (degrees of freedom) fields.
- 12.
We now take D as generic, not necessarily \(D=3\), as mentioned in Sect. 6.2.1.
- 13.
\(\textrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})\) is also possible as a subgroup of the T-duality group.
- 14.
\(\Lambda^2 <0\) is required for the Euclidean action to be real (see Sects. 6.1 and 6.1.1).
- 15.
Due to the quantum Hamiltonian having an additional spin term, to avoid imaginary solutions to (6.301), we restrict the analysis to the region of parameter space where \(\Upsilon>0\). This corresponds to \(\omega < -D / (D-1)\) when \(\Lambda >0\) and \(\omega >-D/(D-1)\) if \(\Lambda <0\).
- 16.
The geometry of the spatial sections of the Kantowski–Sachs model is \(S^1 \times S^2\). The symmetry group of these surfaces is of the Bianchi type IX, but only acts transitively on 2D surfaces that foliate the three-space.
- 17.
For simplicity, however, we consider the case where \(A=0\). This corresponds to the limit \(\varsigma \rightarrow -\infty\) and denotes a weak coupling regime for ς. In the strong limit (\(\varsigma \rightarrow +\infty\)), the term in A dominates and Λ can be positive. In the former situation, the ‘averaged’ scale factor volume (represented by α) and the dilaton are more important, while in the latter a large anisotropy dominates in the spatial directions. This allows Λ to be positive. In particular, one may have \(\varsigma \leftarrow +\infty\) and \(u \rightarrow -\infty\), with, e.g., the singularity \(a_2 \rightarrow 0\), \(a_1 \rightarrow \infty\).
- 18.
A non-diagonal minisuperspace metric would mean that fermionic states could not be clearly separated after the wave function has been annihilated by the supercharges.
References
J. Bene and R. Graham: Supersymmetric homogeneous quantum cosmologies coupled to a scalar field. Phys. Rev. D 49, 799–815 (1994)
E.E. Donets, M.N. Tentyukov, and M.M. Tsulaia: Towards Ns = 2 SUSY homogeneous quantum cosmology, Einstein–Yang–Mills systems. Phys. Rev. D 59, 023515 (1999)
R. Graham: Supersymmetric Bianchi type IX cosmology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1381–1383 (1991)
R. Graham and J. Bene: Supersymmetric Bianchi type IX cosmology with a scalar field. Phys. Lett. B 302, 183–188 (1993)
J.E. Lidsey: Scale factor duality and hidden supersymmetry in scalar–tensor cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 52, 5407–5411 (1995)
J.E. Lidsey and J. Maharana: Dualities and hidden supersymmetry in string quantum cosmology, tt gr-qc/9801090 (1998)
J.E. Lidsey and P.V. Moniz: Supersymmetric quantization of anisotropic scalar–tensor cosmologies. Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 4823–4840 (2000)
P.V. Moniz: N = 2 supersymmetric FRW quantum cosmology from a D-p-brane gas. J. Phys. A 37, 10445–10458 (2004)
F. Assaoui and T. Lhallabi: Supersymmetry and quantum cosmology. Phys. Lett. B 509, 315–322 (2001)
E.E. Donets, A. Pashnev, V.O. Rivelles, D.P. Sorokin, and M. Tsulaia: N = 4 superconformal mechanics and the potential structure of AdS spaces. Phys. Lett. B 484, 337–346 (2000)
E.E. Donets, A. Pashnev, J.J. Rosales, and M. Tsulaia: Partial supersymmetry breaking in multidimensional N = 4 SUSY QM, tt hep-th/0001194 (1999)
E.E. Donets, A. Pashnev, J.J. Rosales, and M.M. Tsulaia: N = 4 supersymmetric multidimensional quantum mechanics, partial SUSY breaking and superconformal quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. D 61, 043512 (2000)
R. Graham: Anisotropic diagonal Bianchi type IX minisuperspace with N = 4 supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. D 48, 1602–1606 (1993)
E.A. Ivanov, S.O. Krivonos, and A.I. Pashnev: Partial supersymmetry breaking in N = 4 supersymmetric quantum mechanics. Class. Quant. Grav. 8, 19–40 (1991)
M.P. Ryan and L.C. Shepley: Homogeneous Relativistic Cosmologies. Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1975)
R. Graham: Supersymmetric general Bianchi type IX cosmology with a cosmological term. Phys. Lett. B 277, 393–397 (1992)
J. Socorro and E.R. Medina: Supersymmetric quantum mechanics for Bianchi class A models. Phys. Rev. D 61, 087702 (2000)
C. Kiefer: Quantum gravity. A general introduction. Lect. Notes Phys. 631, 3–13 (2003)
C. Kiefer. Quantum Gravity, 2nd edn., International Series of Monographs on Physics 136, Clarendon Press, Oxford (2007)
C. Kiefer: Quantum cosmology. Expectations and results. Ann. Phys. 15, 316–325 (2006)
C. Kiefer: Continuous measurement of intrinsic time by fermions. Class. Quant. Grav. 6, 561 (1989)
C. Kiefer: Quantum cosmology and the emergence of a classical world, tt gr-qc/9308025 (1993)
C. Kiefer: Conceptual issues in quantum cosmology. Lect. Notes Phys. 541, 158–187 (2000)
P.V. Moniz: Can the imprint of an early supersymmetric quantum cosmological epoch be present in our cosmological observations? Given at COSMO 97, 1st International Workshop on Particle Physics and the Early Universe, Ambleside, England, 15–19 September 1997
P.V. Moniz: Origin of structure in a supersymmetric quantum universe. Phys. Rev. D 57, 7071–7074 (1998)
P. Moniz: FRW minisuperspace with local N = 4 supersymmetry and self-interacting scalar field. Ann. Phys. 12, 174–198 (2003)
C. Kiefer, T. Luck, and P. Moniz: The semiclassical approximation to supersymmetric quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 72, 045006 (2005)
S.W. Hawking and D.N. Page: The spectrum of wormholes. Phys. Rev. D 42, 2655–2663 (1990)
J. Socorro: Supersymmetric quantum solution for FRW cosmological model with matter. Rev. Mex. Fis. 48, 112–117 (2002)
J. Socorro: Classical solutions from quantum regime for barotropic FRW model. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 42, 2087–2096 (2003)
J. Socorro: Supersymmetric quantum cosmology. FRW coupled with matter. Rev. Mex. Fis. 49S2, 98–101 (2003)
H. Rosu: Strictly isospectral supersymmetric potentials and the Riccati superposition principle. Nuovo Cim. B 114, 723–726 (1999)
H. Rosu and J. Socorro: Supersymmetric strictly isospectral FRW models for zero factor ordering. Nuovo Cim. B 113, 683–689 (1998)
H.C. Rosu: Darboux class of cosmological fluids with time-dependent adiabatic indices. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 15, 979 (2000)
H.C. Rosu and J. Socorro: Isospectral supersymmetry in quantum cosmology, tt gr-qc/9603058 (1996)
H.C. Rosu and J.Socorro: One-parameter family of closed, radiation-filled Friedmann–Robertson–Walker quantum universes. Phys. Lett. A 223, 28–30 (1996)
H.C. Rosu, J. Socorro, and O. Obregon: Strictly isospectral Bianchi type II cosmological models, tt gr-qc/9606030 (1996)
H.C. Rosu: Strictly isospectral multiple-well potentials and their multiple-parameter supersymmetric zero modes in unbroken SUSY QM, tt quant-ph/9904007 (1999)
J. Socorro, M.A. Reyes, and F.A. Gelbert: Factorization approach for barotropic FRWmodel with a cosmological constant. Phys. Lett. A 313, 338–342 (2003)
O. Bertolami and P.V. Moniz: Decoherence of Friedmann–Robertson–Walker geometries in the presence of massive vector fields with U(1) or SO(3) global symmetries. Nucl. Phys. B 439, 259–290 (1995)
P.V. Moniz and J.M. Mourao: Homogeneous and isotropic closed cosmologies with a gauge sector. Class. Quant. Grav. 8, 1815–1832 (1991)
C.V. Johnson: D-Branes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MS (2003)
M. Kaku: Introduction to Superstrings and M-Theory. Springer, New York (1999)
M. Kaku: Strings, Conformal Fields, and M-Theory. Springer, New York (2000)
J. Polchinski: String Theory. 1. An Introduction to the Bosonic String. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
J. Polchinski: String Theory. 2. Superstring Theory and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
B. Zwiebach: A First Course in String Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
M. Gasperini and G. Veneziano: The pre-big bang scenario in string cosmology. Phys. Rept. 373, 1–212 (2003)
J.E. Lidsey: Stringy quantum cosmology. Prepared for 2nd Journée Cosmologique within the framework of the International School of Astrophysics, D. Chalonge, Paris, France, 2–4 June 1994
J.E. Lidsey: Bianchi IX quantum cosmology of the heterotic string. Phys. Rev. D 49, 599–602 (1994)
J.E. Lidsey: Solutions to the Wheeler–DeWitt equation inspired by the string effective action. Class. Quant. Grav. 11, 1211–1224 (1994)
J.E. Lidsey: Stringy quantum cosmology of the Bianchi class A, gr-qc/9404050 (1994)
J.E. Lidsey: Quantum cosmology of generalized two-dimensional dilaton gravity models. Phys. Rev. D 51, 6829–6842 (1995)
J. Maharana and J.H. Schwarz: Noncompact symmetries in string theory. Nucl. Phys. B 390, 3–32 (1993)
M. Cavaglia and P.V. Moniz: Canonical and quantum FRW cosmological solutions in M-theory. Class. Quant. Grav. 18, 95–120 (2001)
J.E. Lidsey, D. Wands, and E.J. Copeland: Superstring cosmology. Phys. Rep. 337, 343–492 (2000)
P.V. Moniz: FRW quantum cosmology in the non-Abelian Born–Infeld theory. Class. Quant. Grav. 19, L127–L134 (2002)
Y. Fujii and K. Maeda: The Scalar–Tensor Theory of Gravitation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA (2003)
D. Clancy, J.E. Lidsey, and R.K. Tavakol: Effects of anisotropy and spatial curvature on the pre-big bang scenario. Phys. Rev. D 58, 044017 (1998)
D. Clancy, J.E. Lidsey, and R.K. Tavakol: Scale factor dualities in anisotropic cosmologies. Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 257–272 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moniz, P.V. (2010). Cosmologies with (Hidden) N=2 Supersymmetry. In: Quantum Cosmology - The Supersymmetric Perspective - Vol. 1. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 803. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11575-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11575-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11574-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11575-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)