Skip to main content

A Plea for the Restoration of Alpine Rivers: Basic Principles Derived from the “Rhone-Thur” Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Alpine Waters

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 6))

Abstract

Hydropower use and settlement development adversely affected Alpine rivers and streams. The majority of Swiss and Austrian electricity is produced by hydropower plants, which impact the natural flow regime of running waters. In addition, channelization impairs the river morphology.

The resulting changes (alterations of the natural flow regime, lack of hydrological connectivity, deficits in morphology) significantly affect the ecology of rivers and streams, and cause major deficits. Restoration of hydrological connectivity and ecomorphological integrity is an urgent need for Alpine streams. The “Rhone-Thur” project developed guidelines for planning river restoration and formulated ten basic elements for carrying out successful projects. Inclusion of a reference system, baseline monitoring and a clear definition of project objectives are important steps at the beginning. The project scale and ecological improvements are also specified. Each successful project has to deal with the socio-economic aspects and include the stakeholders in an early project phase. Prediction of restoration measures and the alternative possibilities are helpful processes. After implementation, the core of each project is the evaluation of success and outcome. Comparison of appropriate indicator values before and after the restoration helps to classify the project objectives into different success categories: from failure to great success. However, great success is difficult to achieve and it is important to understand the outcome. Generally, river morphology recovers more quickly after restoration than biological communities (fishes) do. The degree of connectivity to intact neighborhood communities and the size of the restoration area influence the success of the restoration project. Possible restoration sites should therefore be prioritized within the watershed, and sites close to intact habitat with existing source populations provide higher success expectations. For Alpine ecosystems the restoration of a dynamic hydrological regime is a major task and a challenge for the future. This is mainly true for stream reaches with residual flow and river segments with hydropeaking problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wohl E, Angermeier PL, Bledsoe B, Kondolf GM, MacDonnell L, Merritt DM, Palmer MA, Poff NL, Tarboton D (2005) River restoration. Water Resour Res 41:W10301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dynesius M, Nilsson C (1994) Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the World. Science 266:753–762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Woolsey S, Capelli F, Gonser T, Hoehn E, Hostmann M, Junker B, Paetzold A, Roulier C, Schweizer S, Tiegs SD, Tockner K, Weber C, Peter A (2007) A strategy to assess river restoration success. Freshwat Biol 52:752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. FOEN (unpublished) Ökomorphologischer Zustand der Schweizer Fliessgewässer. Zwischenauswertung aufgrund der Erhebungen aus 18 Kantonen. Federal Office for the Environment, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wehren B, Schädler B, Weingartner R (2010) Human Interventions. In: Bundi U (ed.) Alpine Waters. Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol. 6. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schweizer S, Borsuk ME, Reichert P (2007) Predicting the morphological and hydraulic consequences of river rehabilitation. River Res Appl 23:303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hostmann M, Buchecker M, Ejderyan O, Junker B, Schweizer S, Truffer B, Zaugg Stern M (2005) Collective planning of hydraulic engineering projects. Publication of the Rhone-Thur project, http://www.rivermanagement.ch/en/docs/handbook_collective_planning.pdf

  8. Woolsey S, Weber C, Gonser T, Hoehn E, Junker B, Roulier C, Schweizer S, Tiegs S, Tockner K, Peter A (2005) Handbook for evaluating rehabilitation projects in rivers and streams. Publication of the Rhone-Thur project, http://www.rivermanagement.ch/en/docs/handbook_evaluation.pdf

  9. Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD, Lake PS, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm CN, Shah JF, Galat DL, Loss SG, Goodwin P, Hart DD, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Kondolf GM, Lave R, Meyer JL, O'Donnell TK, Pagano L, Sudduth E (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. J Appl Ecol 42:208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wehrli E (1892) Fischleben der kleineren thurg Gewässer. Beitrag zu einer Fauna des Kantons Thurgau. Mitteilungen der Thurgauischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 10:61

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roni P, Liermann M, Jordan C, Steel E (2005) In: Roni P (ed) Monitoring stream and watershed restoration. American Fisheries Society, Maryland, p 13

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reichert P, Borsuk M, Hostmann M, Schweizer S, Sporri C, Tockner K, Truffer B (2007) Concepts of decision support for river rehabilitation. Environ Model Software 22:188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peter A, Kienast F, Woolsey S (2005) River rehabilitation in Switzerland: scope, challenges and research. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 155:643

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benda L, Poff NL, Miller D, Dunne T, Reeves G, Pess G, Pollock M (2004) The network dynamics hypothesis: how channel networks structure riverine habitats. Bioscience 54:413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hillman M, Brierley G (2005) A critical review of catchment-scale stream rehabilitation programmes. Progr Phys Geogr 29:50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boon PJ (1998) River restoration in five dimensions. Aquat Conservat Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 8:257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peter A, Hostmann M, Roulier C, Schager E, Weber C, Woolsey S (2008) River restoration – the long road to success? In: Gumiero B, Rinaldi M, Fokkens B (eds) Proceedings of the 4th ECRR Conference on River Restoration, Venice, 2008, p 593

    Google Scholar 

  18. Detenbeck NE, Devore PW, Niemi GJ, Lima A (1992) Recovery of temperate-stream fish communities from disturbance: a review of case studies and synthesis of theory. Environ Manag 16:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hostmann M (2005) Decision support and river rehabilitation, PhD thesis, ETH No. 16136, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schweizer S, Borsuk ME, Jowett I, Reichert P (2007) Predicting joint frequency distributions of depth and velocity for instream habitat assessment. River Res Appl 23:287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Glenz C (2005) Process-based, spatially-explicit modelling of riparian forest dynamics in Central Europe, PhD Thesis, Laboratory of Ecosystem Management (GECOS), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sporri C, Borsuk M, Peters I, Reichert P (2007) The economic impacts of river rehabilitation: a regional input–output analysis. Ecol Econ 62:341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Alexander G, Barnas K, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Follstad-Shah J, Galat D, Gloss S, Goodwin P, Hart D, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Katz S, Kondolf GM, Lake PS, Lave R, Meyer JL, O'Donnell TK, Pagano L, Powell B, Sudduth E (2005) Synthesizing US river restoration efforts. Science 308:636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Downs PW, Kondolf GM (2002) Post-project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration. Environ Manag 29:477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schager E, Peter A (unpublished) Fischökologische Monitoring Thur. Aufweitung Schäffäuli 2007/2008. Eawag

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dunham JB, Young MK, Gresswell RE, Rieman BE (2003) Effects of fire on fish populations: landscape perspectives on persistence of native fishes and nonnative fish invasions. Forest Ecol Manag 178:183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Henry C, Amoros C (1995) Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: I a scientific base. Environ Manag 19:891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Meile T, Fette M, Baumann P (2005) Synthesebericht Schwall/Sunk. Publication of the Rhone-Thur project. Publication of the Rhone-Thur project, http://www.rivermanagement.ch/schwall-sunk/docs/synthese.pdf

  29. Beechie T, Pess G, Roni P (2008) Setting river restoration priorities: a review of approaches and a general protocol for identifying and prioritizing actions. N Am J Fish Manag 28:891

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The “Rhone-Thur” project was co-financed by the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) and the Office for the Environment of Canton Thurgau (Amt für Umwelt).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armin Peter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peter, A. (2010). A Plea for the Restoration of Alpine Rivers: Basic Principles Derived from the “Rhone-Thur” Case Study. In: Bundi, U. (eds) Alpine Waters. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry(), vol 6. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88275-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics