In the last years, multi-objective genetic algorithms have been successfully applied to obtain Fuzzy Rule-Based Systems satisfying different objectives, usually different performance measures.
Recently, multi-objective genetic algorithms have been also applied to improve the difficult trade-off between interpretability and accuracy of Fuzzy Rule-Based Systems, obtaining linguistic models not only accurate but also interpretable. It is know that both requirements are usually contradictory, however, a multi-objective genetic algorithm can obtain a set of solutions with different degrees of accuracy and interpretability.
This contribution briefly reviews the state of the art in this very recent topic and presents an approach in order to prove the ability of multi-objective genetic algorithms for getting compact fuzzy rule-based systems under rule selection and parameter tuning, i.e., to obtain linguistic models with improved accuracy and the least number of possible rules. This way to work involves another trade-off degree respect with the works in the existing literature which has been still not explored.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Casillas J, CordĂłn O, Herrera F, Magdalena L (2003) (eds), Interpretability issues in fuzzy modeling. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 129, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany
Casillas J, Cordón O, del Jesus M J, Herrera F (2005) Genetic tuning of fuzzy rule deep structures preserving interpretability and its interaction with fuzzy rule set reduction. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 13(1):13–29
Coello Coello C A, Toscano G (2001) A micro-genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1993:126–140
Coello Coello C A, Toscano G (2001) Multiobjective optimization using a micro-genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (San Francisco, California), 274–282
Coello Coello C A, Van Veldhuizen D A, Lamont G B (2002) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Coello Coello C A (2006) Evolutionary multiobjective optimization: A historical view of the field. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 1(1):28–36
Cordón O, Herrera F, Sánchez L (1999), Solving electrical distribution problems using hybrid evolutionary data analysis techniques. Applied Intelligence 10:5–24
Cordon O, Herrera F, del Jesus M J, Villar P (2001) A multiobjective genetic algorithm for feature selection and granularity learning in fuzzy-rule based classification systems. Proceedings of IX IFSA World Congress and XX NAFIPS International Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 1253–1258
Corne D, Knowles J, Oates M (2000) The pareto envelope-based selection algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1917:839–848
Corne D, Jerram N, Knowles J, Oates M (2001) PESA-II: Region based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, San Francisco, Califormia, 283–290
Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratab A, Meyarivan T (2000) A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1917, Paris, France, 849–858
Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK
Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratab A, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2):182-197
Erickson M, Mayer A, Horn J (2001) The niched Pareto genetic algorithm 2 applied to the design of groundwater remediation systems. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1993, London, UK, 681–695
Eshelman L J (1991) The CHC adaptive search algorithm: How to have safe search when engaging in nontraditional genetic recombination. Foundations of genetic Algorithms 1:265–283
Eshelman L J, Schaffer J D (1993) Real-coded genetic algorithms and interval-schemata. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 2:187–202
Fonseca C M, Fleming P J (1993) Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Formulation, discussion and generalization. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, San Mateo, California, 416–423
Horn J, Nafpliotis N, Goldberg D E (1994) A niched pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence 1:82–87
Ishibuchi H, Murata T, Turksen I B (1995) Selecting linguistic classification rules by two-objective genetic algorithms. Proceedings of IEEE-SMC’95, Vancouver, Canada, 1410–1415
Ishibuchi H, Murata T (1996) Multi-objective genetic local search algorithm. Proceedings of Third IEEE International Conference Evolutionary Computation, Japan, 119-124
Ishibuchi H, Murata T, Turksen I B (1997) Single-objective and two-objective genetic algorithms for selecting linguistic rules for pattern classification problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 89(2):135–150
Ishibuchi H, Murata T, Gen M (1998) Performance evaluation of fuzzy rule-based classification systems obtained by multi-objective genetic algorithms. Computers & Industrial Engineering 35(3–4):575–578
Ishibuchi H, Nakashima T, Murata T (2001) Three-objective genetics-based machine learning for linguistic rule extraction. Information Sciences 136:109–133
Ishibuchi H, Nakashima T, Murata T (2001) Multiobjective optimization in linguistic rule extraction from numerical data. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1993:588–602
Ishibuchi H, Yamamoto T (2003) Interpretability issues in fuzzy genetics-based machine learning for linguistic modelling. In Lawry J, Shanahan J G, Ralescu A L (eds) Modelling with Words: Learning, Fusion, and Reasoning within a Formal Liguistic Representation Framework, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2873, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 209–228
Ishibuchi H, Nakashima T, Nii M (2004) (eds) Classification and modeling with linguistic information granules. Advanced Approaches to Linguistic Data Mining Series: Advanced Information Processing, Springer, Berlin
Ishibuchi H, Yamamoto T (2004) Fuzzy rule selection by multi-objective genetic local search algorithms and rule evaluation measures in data mining. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 141(1):59–88
Ishibuchi H, Nojima Y (2007) Analysis of interpretability-accuracy tradeoff of fuzzy systems by multiobjective fuzzy genetics-based machine learning. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 44(1):4–31
Jimenez F, Gomez-Skarmeta A F, Roubos H, Babuska R (2001) Accurate, transparent, and compact fuzzy models for function approximation and dynamic modeling through multi-objective evolutionary optimization. Proceedings of First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1993:653–667
Jimenez F, Gomez-Skarmeta A F, Roubos H, Babuska R (2001) A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for fuzzy modelling. Proceedings of 9th IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 1222–1228
Knowles J D, Corne D W (2000) Approximating the non dominated front using the Pareto archived evolution strategy. Evolutionary Computation 8(2):149–172
Narukawa K, Nojima Y, Ishibuchi H (2005) Modification of evolutionary multiobjectiveoptimization algorithms for multiobjective design of fuzzy rule-based classification systems. Proceedings of 2005 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 809–814
Mamdani E H, Assilian S (1975) An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 7:1–13
Rudolph G, Agapie A (2000) Convergence properties of some multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Proceedings of the 2000 Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 1010–1016
Srinivas N, Deb K (1994) Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation 2:221-248
Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 15(1):116–132
Wang L X, Mendel J M (1992) Generating fuzzy rules by learning from examples. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 22(6):1414–1427
Wang H L, Kwong S, Jin Y C, Wei W, Man K F (2005) Multi-objective hierarchical genetic algorithm for interpretable fuzzy rule-based knowledge extraction. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 149(1):149–186
Wang H L, Kwong S, Jin Y C, Wei W, Man K F (2005) Agentbased evolutionary approach for interpretable rule-based knowledge extraction. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews 35(2):143–155
Zitzler E, Thiele L (1998) Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms–a comparative study. In Eiben A (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature V, Springer-Verlag, Amsterdam, 292–301
Zitzler E, Thiele L (1999) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 3(4):257–271
Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L (2000) Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results. Evolutionary Computation 8(2):173–195
Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2001) SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Proceedings of the Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimization and Control with Application to Industrial Problems, Barcelona, Spain, 95-100
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alcalá, R., Alcalá-Fdez, J., Gacto, M.J., Herrera, F. (2008). On the Usefulness of MOEAs for Getting Compact FRBSs Under Parameter Tuning and Rule Selection. In: Ghosh, A., Dehuri, S., Ghosh, S. (eds) Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Knowledge Discovery from Databases. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 98. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77467-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77467-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77466-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77467-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)