Skip to main content

Control and Its Regulative Function in Public Management

  • Chapter
Public Management
  • 1913 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses management and leadership in public organizations and accentuates the approach oriented at the intellectual capital of the macro-organizational level. Network determinants of public leadership as well as information and disinformation in the management process have been delineated. Moreover, global examples of leadership crises have been offered, where no action or inappropriate reactions to a given crisis situation lead (or have led) to a reduction in the capacity of the current government to act. They have revealed the limited possibilities for exerting influence on the actual course of events, which diminished the already strained authority and, in consequence, resulted in delegitimation of authority to some extent. The chapter shows that people responsible for public governance must obtain, process, and use data and information both for the purposes of carrying out ongoing activity, orientated at performance of the delegated tasks, and efficient leadership. It takes place by way of conversion of data to information and information to knowledge which may serve leadership owing to the wisdom of a given decision maker. Nevertheless, data, information, and knowledge are often applied as part of mass disinformation of the society, which is intended to allow the government to keep its power, or takeover of power, or implement adverse solutions through the mechanism of relieving social tensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2012). Global entrepreneurship & development index (pp. 10–169). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, R. N. (1965). Planning and control systems: A framework for analysis. Boston, MA: Harvard University Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battistelli, F., & Ricotta, G. (2005). The rhetoric of management control in Italian cities: Constructing new meanings of public action. Administration & Society, 36(6), 671–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann, S. (Ed.). (2014). Transformation index BTI 2014. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielski, M. (1997). Organizacje. Istota, struktury, procesy (pp. 116–117). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S.A. (1993, Autumn). Defining and measuring effectiveness in public management. Public Productivity & Management Review, 17(1), 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corruption Perceptions Index 2014, Transparency International, Berlin, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, J.H. (2010, March 2). Czterysta lat efektywności dynamicznej. Wrocław: Fundacja Instytut Ludwika von Misesa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1995). Menedżer skuteczny (p. 25). Kraków: Akademia Ekonomiczna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkin, P. M. (2010). Planowanie i strategie biznesowe. Warszawa: WoltersKluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frączkiewicz-Wronka A. (2010b). Pomiar efektywności organizacji jako obszar konwergencji metod, narzędzi i instrumentów zarządzania między sektorami biznesowym a publicznym. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, nr 4(12), Politechnika Śląska, Gliwice, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2000). Wielki wstrząs (p. 24). Warszawa: Politeja.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparski, W. (2004). Wykłady z etyki biznesu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo WSPiZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2003). Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evaluation and Human Behavior, 24(3), 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glapiński, A. (2012). Meandry historii ekonomii (pp. 284–285). Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gołębiowski, G., & Russel, P. (2013). Audyt i kontrola w koncepcji new public management—rozwiązania organizacyjne w administracji rządowej. Kontrola Państwowa. R.58, nr2 (349), marzec–kwiecień, Warszawa, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R. W. (2004). Podstawy zarządzania organizacjami (pp. 654–655). Warszawa: WN PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausner, J. (1999). Komunikacja i partycypacja społeczna (p. 49). Kraków: MASP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewege, C.R. (2012). A critique of the mainstream management control theory and the way forward. SAGE Open, October–December, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein-Beck, M. (1997). Być albo nie być menadżerem. Warszawa: Indor Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotarbiński, T. (1958). Traktat o dobrej robocie, Zakład Narodowy im (p. 131). Wrocław-Warszawa: Ossolińskich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozuń-Cieślak, G. (2013). Efektywnośćrozważania nad istotą i typologią, “Kwartalnik” Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społecznego, Studia i Prace, nr16, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuc, B. R. (2008). Kontrola—kontroling—audyt: podobieństwa i różnice (p. 11). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo PTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2009). The interdependence of private and public interests. Organization Science, 20, 1034–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T., Kim, B., Holmes, K.R., Roberts, J.M., Riley, B., & Olson, R. (2014). Index of Economic Freedom 2014. The Heritage Foundation, The Wall Street Journal, Washington, DC, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mockler, R. J. (1994a). The management control process (p. 2). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mockler, R. J. (1994b). The management control process (p. 179). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Management Capability Index 2013. (2013, February) New Zealand Institute of Management, Wellington, pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paying Taxes 2014. (2014). PWC, The World Bank, London, Washington, DC, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrzak, I. P. (2010). Planowanie strategiczne w nowoczesnej firmie (pp. 356–357). Warszawa: Oficyna a WoltersKluwer business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (2006, November 14). The competitiveness index: Where America stands. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivenbark, W. (2010). Promote economic development with public–private partnerships, InFocus 42.1 (p. 7). Washington, DC: ICMA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (1995). Ekonomia, t. 1 (p. 185). Warszawa: WN PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, F. (1998). Rethinking Efficiency, referat zaprezentowany na XX Światowym Kongresie Filozofii w Bostonie, 10–15 sierpnia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J. R. (2013). Four-cornered leadership. A framework for making decision (p. 195). Boca Raton, FL: Productivity Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (2013). The global competitiveness report 2013–2013 (pp. 11–15). Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sochacka-Krysiak, H. (2009). Niektóre problem efektywności w gospodarce finansowej samorządu terytorialnego. In S. Wietesek & M. Wypych (Eds.), W poszukiwaniu efektywności finansów publicznych (p. 192). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standardy i wytyczne kontoli wykonywania zadań na podstawie standardów kontroli INTOSAI i praktyki. (2009). ISSAI 3000, Najwyższa Izba Kontroli, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standardy kontroli w administracji rządowej. (2012). Kancelaria Prezesa Rady Ministrów, Warszawa, 12 grudzień.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staniszkis, J. (2006). O władzy i bezsilności (pp. 35–39). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, J. A. F., Freeman, R. E., & Gilbert, D. R. (2001). Kierowanie (p. 538). Warszawa: PWE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, K., Roness, P. G., Verschuere, B., Rubecksen, K., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2009). Autonomy and control of state agencies: comparing states and agencies (p. 24). New York, NY: Pelgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitali, S., Glattfelder, J.B., & Battiston, S. (2011, October 26). The network of global corporate control. PLoS ONE, 6(10), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Competitive Yearbook 2014. (2014). IMD, Lausanne, p. 489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalecenie Komisji z dnia 6 maja. (2003). r. dotyczące definicji przedsiębiorstw mikro, małych i średnich, Dz. Urz. UE L 124 of 20.05.2003, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 763–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Żylicz, T. (2006). Skuteczność a efektywność, “Aura”, nr 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raczkowski, K. (2016). Control and Its Regulative Function in Public Management. In: Public Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20312-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics