Skip to main content

On the Existence of Low-Rank Explanations for Mixed Strategy Behavior

  • Conference paper
Web and Internet Economics (WINE 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8877))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Nash equilibrium is used as a model to explain the observed behavior of players in strategic settings. For example, in many empirical applications we observe player behavior, and the problem is to determine if there exist payoffs for the players for which the equilibrium corresponds to observed player behavior. Computational complexity of Nash equilibria is important in this framework. If the payoffs that explain observed player behavior requires players to have solved a computationally hard problem, then the explanation provided is questionable. In this paper we provide conditions under which observed behavior of players can be explained by games in which Nash equilibria are easy to compute. We identify three structural conditions and show that if the data set of observed behavior satisfies any of these conditions, then it can be explained by payoff matrices for which Nash equilibria are efficiently computable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adsul, B., Garg, J., Mehta, R., Sohoni, M.: Rank-1 bimatrix games: a homeomorphism and a polynomial time algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2011, pp. 195–204. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Afriat, S.N.: The construction of utility functions from expenditure data. International Economic Review 8(1), 67–77 (1967)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Barman, S., Bhaskar, U., Echenique, F., Wierman, A.: On the existence of low-rank explanations for mixed strategy behavior. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.2655 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berry, S., Levinsohn, J., Pakes, A.: Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 841–890 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bresnahan, T.F.: Empirical studies of industries with market power. In: Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 2, pp. 1011–1057 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, X., Dai, D., Du, Y., Teng, S.H.: Settling the complexity of arrow-debreu equilibria in markets with additively separable utilities. In: FOCS (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, X., Deng, X., Teng, S.H.: Settling the complexity of computing two-player nash equilibria. J. ACM 56(3) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garg, J., Jiang, A.X., Mehta, R.: Bilinear games: Polynomial time algorithms for rank based subclasses. In: Chen, N., Elkind, E., Koutsoupias, E. (eds.) WINE 2011. LNCS, vol. 7090, pp. 399–407. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, K.: A polynomial time algorithm for computing an arrow-debreu market equilibrium for linear utilities. SIAM Journal on Computing 37(1), 303–318 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lipton, R.J., Markakis, E., Mehta, A.: Playing large games using simple strategies. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 36–41. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luce, R.D.: Individual Choice Behavior a Theoretical Analysis. John Wiley and Sons (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McFadden, D.: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka, P. (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics, p. 105. Academic Press, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McFadden, D., Richter, M.: Stochastic rationality and revealed stochastic preference. In: Preferences, Uncertainty, and Optimality, Essays in Honor of Leo Hurwicz, pp. 161–186. Westview Press, Boulder (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McFadden, D.: Revealed stochastic preference: a synthesis. Economic Theory 26(2), 245–264 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Samuelson, P.A.: A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour. Economica 5(17), 61–71 (1938)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Varian, H.R.: The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica 50(4), 945–974 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Varian, H.R.: Non-parametric tests of consumer behaviour. Review of Economic Studies 50(1), 99–110 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Varian, H.R.: The nonparametric approach to production analysis. Econometrica 52(3), 579–598 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Varian, H.R.: Revealed preference. In: Samuelsonian Economics and the Twenty-first Century, pp. 99–115 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vazirani, V.V., Yannakakis, M.: Market equilibrium under separable, piecewise-linear, concave utilities. J. ACM 58(3) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barman, S., Bhaskar, U., Echenique, F., Wierman, A. (2014). On the Existence of Low-Rank Explanations for Mixed Strategy Behavior. In: Liu, TY., Qi, Q., Ye, Y. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8877. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13129-0_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13129-0_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13128-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13129-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics