Skip to main content

Randomized Revenue Monotone Mechanisms for Online Advertising

  • Conference paper
Web and Internet Economics (WINE 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8877))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1643 Accesses

Abstract

Online advertising is the main source of revenue for many Internet firms; thus designing effective mechanisms for selecting and pricing ads become an important research question. In this paper, we seek to design truthful mechanisms for online advertising that satisfy Revenue Monotonicity (RM) - a natural property which states that the revenue of a mechanism should not decrease if the number of participants increase or if a participant increases her bid. In a recent work [5], it was argued that RM is a desired goal for proper functioning of an online advertising business. Since popular mechanisms like VCG are not revenue-monotone, they introduced the notion of Price of Revenue Monotonicity (PoRM) to capture the loss in social welfare of a revenue-monotone mechanism. [5] then studied the price of revenue-monotonicity of Combinatorial Auction with Identical Items(CAII). In CAII, there are k identical items to be sold to a group of bidders, where bidder i wants either exactly d i  ∈ {1, …, k} number of items or nothing. CAII generalizes important online advertising scenarios such as image-text and video-pod auctions. In an image-text auction we want to fill an advertising slot with either k text-ads or a single image-ad. In video-pod auction we want to fill a video advertising break of k seconds with video-ads of possibly different durations. [5] showed that no deterministic RM mechanism can attain PoRM of less than ln (k) for CAII, i.e., no deterministic mechanism can attain more than \(\frac{1}{\ln(k)}\) fraction of the maximum social welfare. [5] also design a mechanism with PoRM of O(ln 2(k)) for CAII.

In this paper, first we overcome the impossibility result of [5] for deterministic mechanisms by using the power of randomization. We show that by using randomization, one can attain a constant PoRM; in particular, we design a randomized RM mechanism with PoRM of 3 for CAII. Then, we study a more general Multi-group Combinatorial Auction with Identical Items (MCAII). In MCAII, the bidders are partitioned into multiple groups, and the set of winners are constrainted to be from a single group. The motivation for MCAII is from scenarios where the set of selected ads may be required to have the same format. We give a randomized mechanism which satisfies RM and IC and has PoRM of O(ln k). This is in contrast to log2(k) deterministic mechanism that follows from [5].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ausubel, L.M., Milgrom, P.: Ascending auctions with package bidding. Frontiers of Theoretical Economics 1(1), 1–42 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bikhchandani, S., Chatterji, S., Lavi, R., Mu’alem, A., Nisan, N., Sen, A.: Weak monotonicity characterizes deterministic dominant-strategy implementation. Econometrica 74(4), 1109–1132 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Day, R., Milgrom, P.: Core-selecting package auctions. International Journal of Game Theory 36(3-4), 393–407 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dughmi, S., Roughgarden, T., Sundararajan, M.: Revenue submodularity. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 243–252. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goel, G., Khani, M.R.: Revenue monotone mechanisms for online advertising. In: International World Wide Web Conference, WWW (2014), https://www.cs.umd.edu/~khani/papers/rm.pdf

  6. Goldberg, A.V., Hartline, J.D., Wright, A.: Competitive auctions and digital goods. In: Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 735–744 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg, A.V., Hartline, J.D., Karlin, A.R., Saks, M., Wright, A.: Competitive auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 55(2), 242–269 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Lavi, R., Mu’Alem, A., Nisan, N.: Towards a characterization of truthful combinatorial auctions. In: Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 574–583 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Myerson, R.B.: Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6(1), 58–73 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V.V.: Algorithmic game theory. Cambridge University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rastegari, B., Condon, A., Leyton-Brown, K.: Stepwise randomized combinatorial auctions achieve revenue monotonicity. In: Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 738–747 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rastegari, B., Condon, A., Leyton-Brown, K.: Revenue monotonicity in deterministic, dominant-strategy combinatorial auctions. Artificial Intelligence 175(2), 441–456 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts, K.: The characterization of implementable choice rules. Aggregation and Revelation of Preferences 12(2), 321–348 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rochet, J.-C.: A necessary and sufficient condition for rationalizability in a quasi-linear context. Journal of Mathematical Economics 16(2), 191–200 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Saks, M., Yu, L.: Weak monotonicity suffices for truthfulness on convex domains. In: Electronic Commerce, pp. 286–293 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goel, G., Hajiaghayi, M., Khani, M.R. (2014). Randomized Revenue Monotone Mechanisms for Online Advertising. In: Liu, TY., Qi, Q., Ye, Y. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8877. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13129-0_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13129-0_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13128-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13129-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics