Skip to main content

Markets for Efficient Public Good Allocation with Social Distancing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web and Internet Economics (WINE 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12495))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Public goods are often either over-consumed in the absence of regulatory mechanisms, or remain completely unused, as in the Covid-19 pandemic, where social distance constraints are enforced to limit the number of people who can share public spaces. In this work, we plug this gap through market mechanisms designed to efficiently allocate capacity constrained public goods. To design these mechanisms, we leverage the theory of Fisher markets, wherein each agent is endowed with an artificial currency budget that they can spend to avail public goods. While Fisher markets provide a strong methodological backbone to model resource allocation problems, their applicability is limited to settings involving two types of constraints - budgets of individual buyers and capacities of goods. Thus, we introduce a modified Fisher market, where each individual may have additional physical constraints, characterize its solution properties and establish the existence of a market equilibrium. Furthermore, to account for additional constraints we introduce a social convex optimization problem where we perturb the budgets of agents such that the KKT conditions of the perturbed social problem establishes equilibrium prices. Finally, to compute the budget perturbations we present a fixed point scheme and illustrate convergence guarantees through numerical experiments. Thus, our mechanism, both theoretically and computationally, overcomes a fundamental limitation of classical Fisher markets, which only consider capacity and budget constraints.

This work is partly supported by the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong (GRF Project no. 16215717 and 16243516), National Science Foundation (NSF) under CAREER Award CMMI1454737 and Toyota Research Institute (TRI). This article solely reflects the opinions of its authors and not NSF, TRI, or any other entity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) (2020). https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public. Accessed 8 Jul 2020

  2. Arrow, K.J., Debreu, G.: Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22(3), 265–290 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bei, X., Garg, J., Hoefer, M., Mehlhorn, K.: Earning limits in fisher markets with spending-constraint utilities. In: Bilò, V., Flammini, M. (eds.) SAGT 2017. LNCS, vol. 10504, pp. 67–79. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66700-3_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Birnbaum, B., Devanur, N.R., Xiao, L.: New convex programs and distributed algorithms for fisher markets with linear and spending constraint utilities (2010). Unpublished Manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  5. Birnbaum, B., Devanur, N.R., Xiao, L.: Distributed algorithms via gradient descent for fisher markets. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 127–136 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blümel, W., Pethig, R., von dem Hagen, O.: The theory of public goods: a survey of recent issues. J. Inst. Theoret. Econ. (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 142(2), 241–309 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brainard, W.C., Scarf, H.E.: How to compute equilibrium prices in 1891. Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 64(1), 57–83 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Budish, E.: The combinatorial assignment problem: approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes. J. Polit. Econ. 119(6), 1061–1103 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, L., Ye, Y., Zhang, J.: A note on equilibrium pricing as convex optimization. In: International Workshop on Web and Internet Economics (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Devanur, N.R.: The spending constraint model for market equilibrium: algorithmic, existence and uniqueness results. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2004, pp. 519–528. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1007352.1007431

  11. Devanur, N.R., Jain, K., Mai, T., Vazirani, V.V., Yazdanbod, S.: New convex programs for fisher’s market model and its generalizations. CoRR (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01257

  12. Devanur, N.R., Papadimitriou, C., Saberi, A., Vazirani, V.V.: Market equilibrium via a primal-dual algorithm for a convex program. J. ACM 55(5) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eisenberg, E., Gale, D.: Consensus of subjective probabilities: the pari-mutuel method. Ann. Math. Stat. 30(1), 165–168 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Gale, D.: The Theory of Linear Economic Models. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Garg, J., Hoefer, M., Mehlhorn, K.: Approximating the nash social welfare with budget-additive valuations. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2018, pp. 2326–2340. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goldfarb, A.: How to navigate public spaces and more (2020). https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/03/style/etiquette-coronavirus.html. Accessed 10 Jul 2020

  17. Gorokh, A., Banerjee, S., Iyer, K.: Near-efficient allocation using artificial currency in repeated settings. Social Science Research Network (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jalota, D., Qi, Q., Pavone, M., Ye, Y.: Markets for efficient public good allocation with social distancing. CoRR (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10765

  19. Vazirani, V.V.: Combinatorial algorithms for market equilibria. In: Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V.V. (eds.) Algorithmic Game Theory, pp. 103–134. Cambridge University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vazirani, V.V.: Spending constraint utilities with applications to the adwords market. Math. Oper. Res. 35(2), 458–478 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Walras, L.: Elements of Pure Economics: Or, The Theory of Social Wealth. American Economic Association. Translation series, American Economic Association (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yamagishi, T., Sato, K.: Motivational bases of the public goods problem. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50(1), 67–73 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Qi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jalota, D., Pavone, M., Qi, Q., Ye, Y. (2020). Markets for Efficient Public Good Allocation with Social Distancing. In: Chen, X., Gravin, N., Hoefer, M., Mehta, R. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12495. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64946-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64946-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64945-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64946-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics