Abstract
The paper is complementary with papers [1,2,3] which aims were to advance information society research by examining and understanding the information and communication technologies (ICT) adoption within government units in the context of the sustainable information society (SIS). In [4] the impact of ICT adoption on sustainability within government units was explored, whereas this paper extends these research findings by new insights into SIS measurement. The aim of this paper is to propose an approach to the measurement of two constructs shaping SIS, i.e. ICT adoption and sustainability within government units. ICT adoption is described by four sub-constructs, i.e. ICT outlay, information culture, ICT management, and ICT quality, whereas sustainability is composed of ecological, economic, socio-cultural, and political sustainability. This study employs a quantitative approach and, additionally, Hellwig’s taxonomic measure of development is adopted for multivariate comparative analyses to evaluate ICT adoption and sustainability within government units. A value of the Hellwig’s synthetic indicator can be in the interval [0, 1] where a higher value of the indicator means that the object is closer to the pattern. The survey questionnaires were used and data collected from 185 government units were analyzed. We proposed and calculated five synthetic indicators for measuring ICT adoption, i.e. ICT adoption index and sub-indexes of ICT outlay, information culture, ICT management, and ICT quality as well as five synthetic indexes for evaluating sustainability, i.e. sustainability index and sub-indexes of ecological, economic, socio-cultural, and political sustainability. The research revealed that the medium level of ICT adoption index, i.e. in the interval (0.34, 0.68], is in the largest share of examined government units (68.6%). With regard to sustainability, the medium level of sustainability index is in the interval (0.32, 0.64] and is characteristic for 71.2% of government units. Furthermore, the high levels of ICT adoption and sustainability indexes exceeding the value of 0.68 for ICT adoption and 0.64 for sustainability are indicated by 17.0% and 14.4% of government units respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ziemba, E.: The contribution of ICT adoption to the sustainable information society. J. Comput. Inform. Syst. 59, 116–126 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2017.1312635
Ziemba, E.: The ICT adoption in enterprises in the context of the sustainable information society. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems FedCSIS, 3–6 September 2017, pp. 1031–1038. Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2017F89
Ziemba, E.: Synthetic indexes for a sustainable information society: measuring ICT adoption and sustainability in Polish enterprises. In: Ziemba, E. (ed.) AITM/ISM-2017. LNBIP, vol. 311, pp. 151–169. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77721-4_9
Ziemba, E.: The ICT adoption in government units in the context of the sustainable information society. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems FedCSIS, 9–12 September 2018, pp. 725–733. Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan, Poland (2018). https://doi.org/10.15439/2018F116
Fuchs, Ch.: Sustainable information society as ideology (part I). Inf. Tarsadalom 9(2), 7–19 (2009)
Fuchs, Ch.: Sustainable information society as ideology (part II). Inf. Tarsadalom 9(3), 27–52 (2009)
Fuchs, Ch.: Theoretical foundations of defining the participatory, co-operative, sustainable information society. Inf. Comm. Soc. 13(1), 23–47 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180902801585
Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B.: ICT for sustainability: an emerging research field. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 310, 1–34 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_1
Hilty, L.M., Hercheui, M.D.: ICT and sustainable development. In: Berleur, J., Hercheui, M.D., Hilty, L.M. (eds.) CIP/HCC-2010. IAICT, vol. 328, pp. 227–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15479-9_22
Houghton, John W.: ICT and the environment in developing countries: a review of opportunities and developments. In: Berleur, J., Hercheui, M.D., Hilty, Lorenz M. (eds.) CIP/HCC-2010. IAICT, vol. 328, pp. 236–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15479-9_23
Schauer, T.: The sustainable information society – vision and risks. The Club of Rome – European Support Centre, Vienna (2003)
Servaes, J., Carpentier, N. (eds.): Towards a Sustainable Information Society. Deconstructing WSIS. Intellect, Portland (2006)
Ziemba, E.: The holistic and systems approach to a sustainable information society. J. Comput. Inform. Syst. 54(1), 106–116 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645676
Ziemba, E. (ed.): Towards a Sustainable Information Society: People, Business and Public Administration Perspectives. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne (2016)
Avgerou, C.: Discourses on ICT and development. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 6(3), 1–18 (2010)
Curry, E., Donnellan, B.: Understanding the maturity of sustainable ICT. In: vom Brocke, J., Seidel, S., Recker, J. (eds.) Green Business Process Management – Towards the Sustainable Enterprise, pp. 203–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27488-6_12
Donnellan, B., Sheridan, C., Curry, E.: A capability maturity framework for sustainable information and communication technology. IT Prof. 13(1), 33–40 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2011.2
Guillemette, M.G., Paré, G.: Toward a new theory of the contribution of the IT function in organizations. MIS Q. 36(2), 529–551 (2012)
Guillemette, M.G., Paré, G.: Transformation of the information technology function in organizations: a case study in the manufacturing sector. Can. J. Adm. Sci. 29, 177–190 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.224
Seidel, S., Recker, J., vom Brocke, J.: Sensemaking and sustainable practicing: functional affordances of information systems in green transformations. MIS Q. 37(4), 1275–1299 (2013)
Watson, R.T., Boudreau, M.C., Chen, A.J., Huber, M.: Green IS: building sustainable business practices. In: Watson, R.T. (ed.) Information Systems, pp. 247–261. Global Text Project, Athens (2008)
Bartle, J.R., Leuenberger, D.Z.: Sustainable Development for Public Administration. M.E. Sharpe, New York (2009)
McDonald, W.: Sustainable development and public administration: challenges and innovation in citizen engagement. Rev. Pub. Adm. Manag. 5(2), 219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4172/2315-7844.1000219
Parrado, S., Löffler, E.: Towards sustainable public administration. National Agency for the Evaluation of Public Policies and Quality of Services, Madrid (2010). http://www.eupan.eu/files/repository/Final_Report_on_Measuring_Sustainability.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2019
Radu, L.: How to develop sustainable public administration reforms. Transylv. Rev. Adm. Sci. 44E, 180–195 (2015)
Svara, J.H., Brunet, J.R.: Social equity is a pillar of public administration. J. Public Aff. Educ. 11(3), 253–258 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2005.12001398
United Nations: Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1 (2015). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2019
United Nations: Compendium of innovative practices in public governance and administration for sustainable development. Division for Public Administration and Development Management, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2016). https://publicadministration.un.org/publications/content/PDFs/Compendium%20Public%20Governance%20and%20Administration%20for%20Sustainable%20Development.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2019
Jurado-González, J., Gómez-Barroso, J.L.: What became of the information society and development? Assessing the information society’s relevance in the context of an economic crisis. Inf. Technol. Dev. 22(3), 436–463 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1155143
Palvia, P., Baqir, N., Nemati, H.: ICT for socio-economic development: a citizens’ perspective. Inf. Manag. 55, 160–176 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.05.003
Nord, J.H., Riggio, M.T., Paliszkiewicz, J.: Social and economic development through information and communications technologies: Italy. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 57(3), 278–285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1213621
Ross, J.W., Vitale, M.R.: The ERP revolution: surviving vs thriving. Inf. Syst. Front. 2(2), 233–241 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026500224101
Sachs, J.D.: The Age of Sustainable Development. Columbia University Press, New York (2015)
Fuchs, C.: Sustainability and the information society. In: Berleur, J., Nurminen, M.I., Impagliazzo, J. (eds.) HCC 2006. IIFIP, vol. 223, pp. 219–230. Springer, Boston, MA (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37876-3_18
Nicolette, J., Burr, S., Rockel, M.: A practical approach for demonstrating environmental sustainability and stewardship through a net ecosystem service analysis. Sustainability 5, 2152–2177 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3390/su5052152
Nyström, T., Mustaquim, M.M.: Finding sustainability indicators for information system assessment. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, Tampere, 22–24 September 2015, pp. 106–113 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818187.2818278
Missimer, M., Robèrt, K.H., Broman, G.: A strategic approach to social sustainability. part 2: a principle-based definitions. J. Clean. Prod. 149(1), 42–52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059
Khan, R.: How frugal innovation promotes social sustainability. Sustainability 8(10), 1034 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101034
Ngwenya, B.: Realigning governance: from e-government to e-democracy for social and economic development. In: Bwalya, K.J., Mutula, S. (eds.) Digital Solutions for Contemporary Democracy and Government, pp. 21–45. IGI Global, Hershey (2015). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8430-0.ch002
ITU: International Telecommunication Union. Measuring the Information Society Report 2016. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva (2016)
Information Economy Report 2017: Digitalization, Trade, and Development. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNCTAD (2017)
Ziemba, E., Żelazny, R.: Measuring the information society in Poland – dilemmas and a quantified image. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems FedCSIS, 9–12 September 2018, pp. 1185–1192. AGH University of Science and Technology, Cracow (2013)
Bilbao-Osorio, B., Dutta, S., Lanvin, B. (eds.) The Global Information Technology Report 2014. Rewards and Risks of Big Data. World Economic Forum, Geneva (2014)
United Nations: E-government Survey 2018. Gearing e-government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies. United Nations, New York (2018). https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/E-Government%20Survey%202018_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2018
Van de Kerk, G., Manuel, A.R.: A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: the SSI—the sustainable society index. Ecol. Econ. 66, 228–242 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.029
Panda, S., Chakraborty, M., Misra, S.K.: Assessment of social sustainable development in urban India by a composite index. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 5, 435–450 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.08.001
ŚCSI: Strategia rozwoju społeczeństwa informacyjnego województwa śląskiego do roku 2015 [Strategy of information society development in Upper Silesia region]. Śląskie Centrum Społeczeństwa Informacyjnego, Katowice (2009). http://www.e-slask.pl/article/strategia_rozwoju_spoleczenstwa_informacyjnego_wojewodztwa_slaskiego_do_roku_2015. Accessed 12 June 2016
Collis, J., Hussey, R.: Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2003)
Ziemba, E., Papaj, T.: A pragmatic approach to e-government maturity in Poland – implementation and usage of SEKAP. In: Ferrari, E., Castelnovo, W. (eds.) Proceedings of 13th European Conference on eGovernment ECEG, 13–14 June 2013, pp. 560–570. University of Insubria, Como (2013)
Hellwig, Z.: Zastosowanie metody taksono micznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę wykwalifikowanych kadr (The application of the taxonomic method to the typological division of a countries due to their level of development, resources and structure of qualified personnel – in Polish. Przegląd Statystyczny 4, 307–326 (1968)
Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Kaczmarczyk, P.: Application of the linear ordering methods in the voivodships research in the field of social media usage in enterprises in the period 2014–2017. J. Econ. Manag. 33(3), 39–62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2018.33.03
Bolibok, P., Żukowski, M.: The impact of inequalities in regional economic development on disparities in spatial distribution of cashless payment infrastructure in Poland. J. Econ. Manag. 21(3), 173–188 (2015)
Acknowledgement
I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my friend Maria Jadamus-Hacura for helping with statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ziemba, E. (2019). Synthetic Indexes for a Sustainable Information Society: Measuring ICT Adoption and Sustainability in Polish Government Units. In: Ziemba, E. (eds) Information Technology for Management: Emerging Research and Applications. AITM ISM 2018 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 346. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15154-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15154-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15153-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15154-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)