Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainability of Biodiversity Under Global Changes, with Particular Reference to Biological Invasions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Sustainability Science

Abstract

Five major interacting global forces heavily influence changed ­distribution and abundance of biodiversity: (1) biological invasions, (2) overharvest, (3) changes in climate, (4) biogeochemical cycles, and (5) habitat. Modified land use, overharvest, and climate change have already affected distributions over large areas, regionally eliminating or substantially reducing natural resources such as fishing stocks, forestry trees, and traditional food plants. Further, habitat and climate change indirectly affect biodiversity patterns by their effects on invasions, biogeochemical cycles, and overharvest. Species-level biodiversity—the number of species on the planet—is unsustainable unless these impacts are ameliorated. Insufficient attention has been paid to how invasions and changed biogeochemical cycles directly affect distribution and abundance of biodiversity, as opposed to indirectly affecting biodiversity by modifying land use. Several direct, large-scale impacts of invasions and altered biogeochemical cycles on distributions and abundances of important species have been documented. These suggest that these global phenomena warrant much more research. Forestalling these global changes, or simply retarding them, has proven difficult, perhaps because of the immense scale of the enterprises causing them. However, great improvements in preventing or minimizing impacts of invasions are attainable, though we have been slow to develop effective policies and management strategies. Risk assessment procedures for planned introductions and invasion pathways are improving and can be modified to account for predicted climate and biogeochemical changes. Early warning systems, an underused tool in invasive species management, can be expanded and tied to effective rapid response procedures. Many approaches to managing established nonnative populations have produced successful control, but these successes result from projects highly tailored to particular species rather than from “silver bullets” that target multiple invaders simultaneously. Such successes will be possible even as other global changes proceed, so long as we remain committed to the effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott KL (2004) Alien ant invasion on Christmas Island, Indian Ocean: the role of ant-scale mutualisms in the dynamics of supercolonies of the yellow crazy ant, Anoplolepis gracilipes. Ph.D. Thesis. Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Alroy J (2008) Dynamics of origination and extinction in the marine fossil record. PNAS 105(suppl 1): 1536–1542

    Google Scholar 

  • American Museum of Natural History (1998) http://www.amnh.org/science/biodiversity/extinction/Intro/OngoingProces.html. Accessed 15 October 2010

  • Asner GP, Vitousek PM (2005) Remote analysis of biological invasion and biogeochemical change. PNAS 102:4383–4386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin Y (2002) A plague of rats and rubbervines. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer TM, Jones TH (1998) Plant-insect herbivore interactions in elevated CO2: quantitative analyses and guild effects. Oikos 82:212–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife, Barcelona and Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth RG, Cross AE, Fowler SV et al (2001) Case study 5.24. Biological control of an insect to save an endemic tree on St. Helena. In: Wittenberg R, Cock MJW (eds) Invasive alien species: a toolkit of best prevention and management practices. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley BA, Wilcove DS, Oppenheimer M (2010) Climate change increases risk of plant invasion in the Eastern United States. Biol Invasions 12:1855–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britten HB, Brussard PF, Murphy DD (1994) The pending extinction of the Uncompaghre fritillary butterfly. Conserv Biol 8:86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Caraco NF, Correll DL et al (1998) Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civeyrel L, Simberloff D (1996) A tale of two snails: is the cure worse than the disease? Biodiv Conserv 5:1231–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clavero M, García-Berthou E (2005) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate Change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A, eds) IPCC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie RH (2002) Invertebrate invasions on Pacific islands and the replacement of unique native faunas: a synthesis of the land and freshwater snails. Biol Invasions 3:119–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz F, Donlan CJ, Campbell K et al (2005) Conservation action in the Galápagos: feral pig (Sus scrofa) eradication from Santiago Island. Biol Conserv 121:473–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JR, Garcia R (1989) Malaria mosquito in Brazil. In: Dahlsten DL, Garcia R (eds) Eradication of exotic pests. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK, Thrush SF, Agardy MT et al (1995) Environmental effects of marine fishing. Aquat Conserv Marine Freshw Ecosyst 5:205–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulvy NK, Sadovy Y, Reynolds JD (2003) Extinction vulnerability in marine populations. Fish Fish 4:25–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld JG (2010) Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eplee RE (2001) Case study 2.10. Co-ordination of witchweed eradication in the U.S.A. In: Wittenberg R, Cock MJW (eds) Invasive alien species: a toolkit of best prevention and management practices. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher JL, Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H et al (2006) Enhanced soil and leaf nutrient status of a Western Australian Banksia woodland community invaded by Ehrharta calycina and Pelargonium ­capitatum. Plant Soil 284:253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick MC, Weltzin J, Sanders NJ et al (2007) The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardener MR, Atkinson R, Rentería JL (2010) Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos. Restor Ecol 18:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavin T (2007) The sixth extinction: journeys among the lost and left behind. Thomas Dunne Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge B (1992) Global biodiversity. Status of the earth’s living organisms. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Guralnick R (2007) Differential effects of past climate warming on mountain and flatland species distributions: a multispecies North American mammal assessment. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays WST, Conant S (2007) Biology and impacts of Pacific island invasive species. 1. A worldwide review of effects of the small Indian mongoose, Herpestes javanicus (Carnivora: Herpestidae). Pac Sci 61:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth R, Anderson D, Cloern J et al (2000) Nutrient pollution of coastal rivers, bays, and seas. Issues Ecol 7:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth R et al (2005) Nutrient management. In: Chopra K et al (eds) Ecosystems and human well-being: policy responses: findings of the Responses Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen W (2005) Area-wide integrated pest management and the sterile insect technique. In: Dyck VA, Hendrichs J, Robinson AS (eds) Sterile insect technique. Principles and practice in area-wide integrated pest management. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP, Gardner TA (2010) Conservation in human-modified landscapes. In: Sodhi NS, Ehrlich PR (eds) Conservation biology for all. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey RE, Lewin R (1995) The sixth extinction: patterns of life and the future of humankind. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wilcove DS (2005) Threats to vertebrate species in China and the United States. Bioscience 55:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP (2007) Invasion ecology. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack R (2011) Cheatgrass. In: Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack R, Simberloff D, Lonsdale M et al (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Master LL, Stein BA, Kutner LS et al (2000) Vanishing assets. Conservation status of U.S. species. In: Stein BA, Kutner LS, Adams JS (eds) Precious heritage. The status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews S, Brand K (2004a) Africa invaded. Global Invasive Species Programme, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews S, Brand K (2004b) Tropical Asia invaded. Global Invasive Species Programme, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1997) The dimensions of life on earth. In: Raven PH, Williams T (eds) Nature and human society. The quest for a sustainable world. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz B (2007) Climate change 2007: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble I et al (2005) Climate change. In: Chopra K et al (eds) Ecosystems and human well-being: policy responses: findings of the responses working group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dowd DJ, Green PT, Lake PS (2003) Invasional “meltdown” on an oceanic island. Ecol Lett 6:812–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (US Congress) (1987) Technologies to maintain biological diversity, OTA-F-330. US Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr JC, Fabry VJ, Aumont O et al (2005) Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 437:681–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascal M, Le Guyader H, Simberloff D (2010) Biological invasions and the conservation of biodiversity. World Org Anim Health (OIE) Sci Tech Rev 29:387–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres CA (2010) Overexploitation. In: Sodhi NS, Ehrlich PR (eds) Conservation biology for all. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR (1999) A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J Environ Manage 57:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL (1998) Extinction. In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Conservation science and action. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL (2007) The extinction puzzle. http://www.projectsyndicate.org/commentary/pimm1/English. Accessed 15 October 2010

  • Pounds JA, Fogden MLP, Campbell JH (1999) Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature 398:611–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB (2010) Essentials of conservation biology, 5th edn. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall R (2001) Case study 5.5. Eradication of a deliberately introduced plant found to be invasive. In: Wittenberg R, Cock MJW (eds) Invasive alien species: a toolkit of best prevention and management practices. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Raup DM, Sepkoski JJ (1982) Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science 215:1501–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries L, Fletcher RJ Jr, Battin J et al (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:491–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds) (2003) Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Schardt JD (1997) Maintenance control. In: Simberloff D, Schmitz DC, Brown TC (eds) Strangers in paradise: impact and management of nonindigenous species in Florida. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz DC, Simberloff D, Hofstetter RH et al (1997) The ecological impacts of nonindigenous plants. In: Simberloff D, Schmitz DC, Brown TC (eds) Strangers in paradise: impact and management of nonindigenous species in Florida. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte P, Alegret L, Arenillas I et al (2010) The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Science 327:1214–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepkoski JJ Jr (1984) A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10:247–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1986) The proximate causes of extinction. In: Raup D, Jablonski D (eds) Patterns and processes in the history of life (Dahlem Conference L536). Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2002) Ecological and economic impacts of alien species. In: Claudi R, Nantel RP, Muckle-Jeffs E (eds) Alien invaders in Canada’s waters, wetlands, and forests. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown six years later—important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol Lett 9:912–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2010) Invasive species. In: Sodhi NS, Ehrlich PR (eds) Conservation biology for all. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (eds) (2011) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Dayan T, Jones C et al (2000) Character displacement and release in the small Indian mongoose, Herpestes javanicus. Ecology 81:2086–2099

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg IF (2002) Ecological effects of roads. Science Publishers, Enfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein BA, Kutner LS, Adams JS (eds) (2000) Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallis H, Goldstein JH, Daily GC (2010) The natural capital project. In: Sodhi NS, Ehrlich PR (eds) Conservation biology for all. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE et al (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner PJ, Scott JK, Spafford H (2008) The ecological barriers to the recovery of bridal creeper (Asparagus asparagoides (L.) Druce) infested sites: impacts on vegetation and the potential increase in other exotic species. Austral Ecol 33:713–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States National Research Council (2000) Global change: ecosystems research. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driesche R, Hoddle M, Center T (2008) Control of pests and weeds by natural enemies: an introduction to biological control. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM (1986) Biological invasions and ecosystem properties: can species make a difference? In: Mooney HA, Drake JA (eds) Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Walker LR (1989) Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawai’i: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecol Monogr 59:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Walker LR, Whittaker LD et al (1987) Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science 238:802–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Aber J, Howarth RW et al (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: causes and consequences. Issues Ecol 1:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS, Master LL (2005) How many endangered species are there in the United States? Front Ecol Environ 3:414–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J et al (2000) Leading threats to biodiversity: what’s imperiling U.S. species. In: Stein BA, Kutner LS, Adams JS (eds) Precious heritage. The status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Conservation Union (2010) http://www.iucn.org/about/work/programmes/species/red_list/search_iucn_red_list/. Accessed 15 October 2010

Download references

Acknowledgment

I am grateful to Billy Goodman, Michael P. Weinstein, and an anonymous referee for many useful comments on an early draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA

    Daniel Simberloff

Authors
  1. Daniel Simberloff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Simberloff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. PSEG Institute for Sustainability Studie, Montclair State University, Montclair, 70803, New Jersey, USA

    Michael P. Weinstein

  2. Louisiana State University, Nicholson Extension, Baton Rouge, 70803, Louisiana, USA

    R. Eugene Turner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simberloff, D. (2012). Sustainability of Biodiversity Under Global Changes, with Particular Reference to Biological Invasions. In: Weinstein, M., Turner, R. (eds) Sustainability Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3188-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation