Skip to main content

Cities as Dissipative Structures: Global Change and the Vulnerability of Urban Civilization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Techno-industrial society and modern cities as presently conceived are inherently unsustainable. This conclusion flows from the energy and material dynamics of growing cities interpreted in light of the second law of thermodyna­mics. In second law terms, cities are self-organizing, far-from-equilibrium dissipative structures whose “self-organization” is utterly dependent on access to abundant energy and material resources. Cities are also open, growing, dependent subsystems of the materially-closed nongrowing ecosphere—they produce themselves and grow by feeding on energy and matter extracted from their host ecosystems. Indeed, high-income consumer cities are concentrated nodes of material consumption and waste production that parasitize large areas of productive ecosystems and waste sinks lying far outside the cities. The latter constitute the cities’ true “ecological footprints.” In effect, thermodynamic law dictates that cities can increase their own local structure and complexity (negentropy) only by increasing the disorder and randomness (entropy) in their host system, the ecosphere. The problem is that anthropogenic degradation now exceeds ecospheric regeneration and threatens to undermine the very urban civilization causing it. To achieve sustainability, global society must rebalance production and consumption, abandon the growth ethic, relocalize our economies and increase urban-regional self-reliance, all of which fly in the face of prevailing global development ideology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Even preagricultural humans significantly altered energy and material flows through ecosystems by virtue of large per capita energy demands and group living. This necessarily affected biodiversity. As Diamond (1992) writes: “For every area of the world that paleontologists have studied and that humans first reached within the last fifty thousand years, human arrival approximately coincided with massive prehistoric extinctions.” Pimm et al. (1995) estimate “that with only Stone Age technology, the Polynesians exterminated >2,000 bird species, some ∼15% of the world total.”

  2. 2.

    Renegade economist Georgescu-Roegan (1971a, b) was among the first to understand the implications of the second law for the human economy. Starting from the fact that all economic activity must draw low entropy resources out of nature and dump useless high entropy waste back in, he reasoned first that “…in a finite space there can be only a finite amount of low entropy and, second, that low entropy continuously and irrevocably dwindles away.” He further speculated that since modern humans are unlikely to practice restraint in their use of resources, nature and human nature may combine to ensure that “…the destiny of man is to have a short but fiery, exciting, and extravagant life…” (Georgescu-Roegen 1975). This view naturally remains controversial with opponents relying on resource substitutions and human technological ingenuity to defeat such second-law pessimism.

  3. 3.

    For example, as much as a third of pollution and landscape degradation in China is attributable to manufacturing for blissfully unaware consumers in the wealthy cities of North America, Europe, etc.

  4. 4.

    For fuller details of the method, including inclusions, exceptions and limitations, see Rees (2006), WWF (2008, 2010), and www.footprintnetwork.org/atlas.

  5. 5.

    Urban eco-footprints are more difficult to estimate than national EFs. National EFs are based on data routinely collected by government statistical agencies and international (e.g., UN) organizations, but no such agencies monitor trade across municipal boundaries. In the absence of original local data-gathering capacity, city EFs can be based on the national per capita estimate adjusted for local variations in income, energy sources, lifestyles, etc.

  6. 6.

    The terrestrial area of Japan is only about 37,770,000 ha but Japan’s terrestrial ecosystems are considerably more productive than the world average. This increases the country’s bio-capacity to about 89,000,000 gha.

  7. 7.

    See http://www.bioregional.com/ and http://www.oneplanetliving.org/index.html.

  8. 8.

    One must also ask how we could accommodate urbanized nations that are deeply in ecological debt. Remember Tokyo and Japan? Globalization has enabled that country to grow and run such a large ecological deficit that it would be impossible to create a viable bioregional “City State of Tokyo” even if we could ignore Japan’s other 95 million inhabitants and had access to the entire country! (Other mega-cities and their home states face similar problems).

  9. 9.

    That said, the example of Tokyo illustrates that some form of trade will be necessary even as the balance tilts toward greater self-reliance.

  10. 10.

    There is already a precedent. In April 2009, a military-backed popular uprising toppled the government of Madagascar when the citizenry learned their leaders had entered a long-term lease agreement for much of their nation’s farmland with the Daewoo Corporation of South Korea. Madagascar’s new government canceled the agreement.

References

  • Anderson K, Bows A (2008) Reframing the climate change challenge in light of post-2000 emission trends. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 366(1882):3863–3882. doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrash D (1979) The Whisperings within—evolution and the origin of human nature. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow C (1991) Land degradation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The social construction of reality. Doubleday, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassman KG (1999) Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:5952–5959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conforti P, Giampietro M (1997) Fossil energy use in agriculture: an international comparison. Agric Ecosyst Environ 65:231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotula L, Vermeulen S, Leonard R et al (2009) Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. IIED/FAO/IFAD, London/Rome. ISBN 978-1-84369-741-1

    Google Scholar 

  • CSIS (2007) The age of consequences: the foreign policy and national security implications of climate change. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington. http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071105_ageofconsequences.pdf

  • Diamond J (1992) The third chimpanzee. Harper Collins Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan RC (2001) World energy production, population growth, and the road to the Olduvai Gorge. Popul Environ 22:503–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan RC, Youngquist W (1999) Encircling the peak of world oil production. Nat Resour Res 8:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddington AS (1929) The nature of the physical world. Macmillan Company, New York ([re]Published by Kessinger Publishing, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2010) International energy outlook 2010. Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2000) Land resource potential and constraints at regional and country levels. Food and Agriculture Organization (United Nations), Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Jansson A-M, Larsson J et al (1997) Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio 26:167–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler C, Hobbs L (2003) Is humanity sustainable? Proc R Soc Lond B 270(1533):2579–2583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegan N (1971a) The entropy law and the economic problem. Distinguished lecture series no 1. University of Alabama, Department of Economics, Alabama

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegan N (1971b) The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N (1975) Energy and economic myths. South Econ J 41:347–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girardet H (2004) The metabolism of cities. In: Wheeler S, Beatley T (eds) Sustainable urban development reader. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant C (1998) Myths we live by. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Fischer-Kowalski M, Krausmann J et al (2004) Progress toward sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy 21:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinberg R (2007) Peak everything—waking up to the century of declines. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins R (2008) The transition handbook: from oil dependency to local resilience. Green Books, Totnes

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2010) World energy outlook 2010. International Energy Agency, Paris. Executive summary at http://www.iea.org/Textbase/npsum/weo2010sum.pdf

  • IMF (2011) World economic outlook database (April 2011). International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay J, Regier H (2000) Uncertainty, complexity, and ecological integrity. In: Crabbé P, Holland A et al (eds) Implementing ecological integrity: restoring regional and global environment and human health (NATO science series IV: earth and environmental sciences), vol 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 121–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger M, Rees WE (2009) Footprints on the prairies: degradation and sustainability of Canadian agricultural land in a globalizing world. Ecol Econ 68:2309–2315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laherrere J (2003) Forecast of oil and gas supply to 2050. In: Paper presented to ‘Petrotech 2003—New Delhi’. http://www.hubbertpeak.com/laherrere/Petrotech090103.pdf

  • Marcotullio P, McGranahan G (eds) (2007) Scaling urban environmental challenges—from local to global and back. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Martine G, McGranahan G, Montgomery M, Fernández-Castilla R (eds) (2008) The new global frontier—urbanization poverty and environment in the 21st century. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D (2007) Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:13268–13272. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0611508104

  • Newman P, Jennings I (2008) Cities as sustainable ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1971) Fundamentals of ecology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD-FAO (2010) Agricultural outlook 2010–2019. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Russell GJ et al (1995) The future of biodiversity. Science 296:347–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponting C (1991) A green history of the world. Sinclair-Stevenson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I (1997) The end of certainty: time, chaos and the new laws of nature. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 4:120–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (1997) Is ‘sustainable city’ an oxymoron? Local Environ 2:303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (1999) Consuming the earth: the biophysics of sustainability. Ecol Econ 29:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (2002) Globalization and sustainability: conflict or convergence? Bull Sci Technol Soc 22:249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (2003) Understanding urban ecosystems: an ecological economics perspective. In: Berkowitz A et al (eds) Understanding urban ecosystems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (2006) Ecological footprints and biocapacity: essential elements in sustainability assessment. In: Dewulf J, Van Langenhove H (eds) Renewables-based technology: sustainability assessment. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (2008) Human nature, eco-footprints and environmental injustice. Local Environ 13:685–701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13549830802475609

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (2009) The ecological crisis and self-delusion: implications for the building sector. Build Res Inform 37:300–311. doi:10.1080/09613210902781470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (2010) What’s blocking sustainability? Human nature, cognition and denial. Sustain Sci Pract Pol 6:13–25. http://sspp.proquest.com/archives/vol6iss2/1001-012.rees.html

  • Register R (2006) Ecocities: rebuilding cities in balance with nature (revised edition). New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Register R (2009) Cities can save the earth. Foreign policy in focus. http://www.fpif.org/articles/cities_can_save_the_earth. Accessed 12 May 2009

  • Schneider ED, Kay JJ (1994) Complexity and thermodynamics: toward a new ecology. Futures 26:626–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider ED, Kay JJ (1995) Order from disorder: the thermodynamics of complexity in biology. In: Murphy MP, O’Neill LAJ (eds) What is life: the next fifty years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz P, Randall D (2003) An abrupt climate change scenario and its implications for United States national security. Report prepared for the US Defense Department, Washington. http://www.climate.org/PDF/clim_change_scenario.pdf

  • SDIS (2004) Disappearing land: soil degradation. Sustainable Development Information Service, Global Trends (World Resources Institute), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah A (2010) Poverty facts and stats (citing World Bank Development Indicators 2008). http://www.globalissues.org/article/26/poverty-facts-and-stats

  • Tainter J (1988) The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainter J (1995) Sustainability of complex societies. Futures 27:397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2009) Outsourcing’s Third Wave (21 May 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman B (1984) The march of folly. Alfred Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2009) World urbanization prospects: the 2009 revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division, United Nations, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince G (2009) Surviving in a warmer world. New Sci 201:29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Kitzes J et al (2006) The ecological footprint of cities and regions: comparing resource availability with resource demand. Environ Urban 18:103–112. doi:10.1177/0956247806063978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren-Rhodes K, Koenig A (2001) Ecosystem appropriation by Hong Kong and its implications for sustainable development. Ecol Econ 39:347–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson R, Pickett K (2009) The spirit level—why greater equality makes societies stronger. Bloomsbury Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • WMO (2010) 2010 in the top three warmest years, 2001–2010 warmest 10-year period. Press Release No 904 (2 Oct 2010). World Meteorological Organization, Geneva http://www.wmo.int/pages/mediacentre/press_releases/pr_904_en.html

  • WRI (2000) Weight of nations: material outflows from industrial economies. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF (2008) Living planet report 2008. World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF (2010) Living planet report 2010. World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William E. Rees .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rees, W.E. (2012). Cities as Dissipative Structures: Global Change and the Vulnerability of Urban Civilization. In: Weinstein, M., Turner, R. (eds) Sustainability Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3188-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics