Skip to main content

Simulated Ultrasound Tomographic Imaging of Defects

  • Conference paper
Neural Network Applications

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Neural Computing ((PERSPECT.NEURAL))

  • 197 Accesses

Abstract

Simulations of ultrasound tomography have demonstrated that artificial neural networks can solve the inverse problem in ultrasound tomography. A highly simplified model of ultrasound propagation was constructed, taking no account of refraction or diffraction, and using only longitudinal wave time of flight (TOF). TOF data was used as the network inputs, and the target outputs were the expected pixel maps, showing defects (grey scale coded) according to the velocity of the wave in the defect.

The effects of varying resolution and defect velocity were explored. It was found that defects could be imaged using time of flight of ultrasonic rays. Further simulations also investigated a configuration that could be implemented experimentally. It was found that in this case the resolution had to be limited to achieve successful reconstructions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stone D.E.W. and Clarke B. Non-destructive evaluation of composites–an overview. In Matthews F.L., Buskell N.C.R., Hodgkinson J.M., and Morton J., editors, 6th International Conference on Composite Materials and 2nd European Conference on Composite Materials, volume 1, pages 2–59, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Middleton D.H. ed. Composites Materials in Aircraft Structures. Longman Scientific Technical, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mueller R.K, Kaveh M, and Wade G. Reconstructive tomography and applications to ultrasonics. IEEE Proceedings, 67: 4: 567–587, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenleaf J.F. and Bahn R.C. Clinical imaging with transmissive ultrasonic computerized tomography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng, 28: 177, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eberhard J.W. Ultrasonic tomography for nondestructive evaluation. Ann. Rev. Mater Sci, 12, 1, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kak A.C. and Slaney M. Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. IEEE Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Censor Y. Finite series expansion reconstruction techniques. Proc. IEEE, 71: 409419, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lippmann R.P. An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE ASSP Magazine, 4: 2: 4–22, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rumelhart D.E and Hinton G.E and Williams N. Learning internal representations by error propagation (in parallel distributed processing ed rumelhart and mclelland), 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hecht-Nielson R. Neurocomputing: Picking the human brain. IEEE’ Spectrum, MARCH: 36–41, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Watanabe S and Yoneyama M. Ultrasonic robot eyes using neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 37 (3 May): 141–147, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Conrath B.C, Daft C.M.W, and O’Brien W.D. Applications of neural networks to ultrasound tomography. Ultrasonics Symposium, pages 1007–1010, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nikoonahad M and Liu D.C. Medical ultrasound imaging using neural networks. Electronic Letters, 26 (8 Apr 14): 545–546, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mann J.M, Schmerr L.W, and Moulder J.C. Neural network inversion of uniform-field eddy current data. Materials Evaluation, Jan: 34–39, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gonda T., Kakiuchi H, and Moriya K. In situ observation of internal structures in growing ice crystals by laser scattering tomography. Journal öf Crystal Growth, 102(1–2 Mar-Apr):179–184, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Obellianne C, Fogelman Soulie F, and Galibourg G. Connectionist models for image processing. In Simon J.C, editor, From pixels to features, COST15 workshop, pages 185–196. Elsevier, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Platzer H. Optical image processing. In Proc. 2nd Scandinavian conf. on image analysis, pages 128–139, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rumelhart D.E and Hinton G.E and Williams N. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323 NO 9: 533–536, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chiu W.C. Anthony D.M. Hines E.L. Forno C. Hunt R. And Oldfield S. Selection of the optimal mlp net for photogrammetric target processing. In lasted Conf. Artificial Intelligence App. & Neural Networks. pages 180–183, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vogl T.P., Mangis J.K., Rigler A.K., and Zink W.T. and Alkon D.L. Accelerating the convergence of the back-propagation method. Biological Cybernetics, 59: 257–263, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Todd-Pokropek A.E. The comparison of a black and white and a color display: An example of the use of receiver operating characteristic curves. IEEE Transactions, MI-2: 19–23, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Swets J.A. Roc analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. Investigative Radiology, 14 PT 2: 109–121, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meistrell M.L. Evaluation of neural network performance by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: examples from the biotechnology domain, pages 73–80. Elsevier, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anthony D.M. The Use of Artificial Neural Networks in Classifying Lung Scintigrams. PhD thesis, University of Warwick, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sas users’s guide, statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sankar A and Mammone R.J. Optimal pruning of neural tree networks for improved generalization. In Proc. 5th International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Seattle, 1991. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Anthony, D.M., Hines, E.L., Hutchins, D.A., Mottram, J.T. (1992). Simulated Ultrasound Tomographic Imaging of Defects. In: Taylor, J.G. (eds) Neural Network Applications. Perspectives in Neural Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2003-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2003-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19772-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2003-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics