Skip to main content

Quality Assurance of Clinical Trials in the Management of Cancer in the Head and Neck

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Head and Neck Cancer

Abstract

Integrating tissue analysis and imaging strategies in clinical trial objectives is an important area of clinical translational research. Clinical trial designs that incorporate clear guidelines for clinical trial execution, definitions of data submission pathways and study deviations, and integration of real time and adaptive quality assurance will provide uniformity of study populations for clinical trial analysis. Essential to clinical trials management is a robust, validated informatics platform to display data and imaging in a uniform manner acquired from diverse platforms and re-presented for both on site and distributed review in a uniform file format. The Quality Assurance Review Center (QARC) uses a robust informatics platform to provide protocol development, site credentialing, data acquisition, case management, capable of both real time and retrospective review of objects, data transfer to clinical trial sponsor and/or industry partner and data archiving. As a member of the Virtual Imaging Evaluation Workspace (VIEW) and the Advanced Technology Quality Assurance (QA) Consortium (ATC), QARC collaborates in the development, sharing and implementation of credentialing tools, digital acquisition and review tools and processes, a common platform for data storage for radiotherapy and imaging with emphasis on compliance to caBIG and 21 CFR Part 11. Recent evidence demonstrates that compliance to study guidelines may have significant influence on study and patient outcome. Head and neck cancer is a very good area to study biopharmacology of treatment response and the quality assurance process is a vehicle for adaptive clinical trial and patient management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deasy JO, Blanco AI, Clark VH. CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research. Med Phys. 2003;30:979–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosch W, Matthews J, Ulin K, et al. Implementation of ATC method 1 for clinical trials data review at the Quality Assurance Review Center. Med Phys. 2006;33:2109.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Molineu A, Followill D, Balter P, et al. Design and implementation of an anthropomorphic quality assurance phantom for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:577–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cadman P, Bassalow R, Sidhu N, et al. Dosimetric considerations for validation of a sequential IMRT process with a commercial treatment planning system. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:3001–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiner MA, Leventhal B, Brecher ML, et al. Randomized study of intensive MOPP-ABVD with or without low-dose total-nodal radiation therapy in the treatment of stages IIB, IIIA2, IIIB, and IV Hodgkin’s disease in pediatric patients: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2769–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolden S, Constine L, Schwartz CL. Real time diagnostic imaging central review and radiotherapy interventional review in multicenter cancer trials. Montreal, Quebec: PROS; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mendenhall NP, Meyer J, Williams J, et al. The impact of central quality assurance review prior to radiation therapy on protocol compliance: POG 9426, a trial in pediatric Hodgkin’s disease. Blood. 2005;106:753.

    Google Scholar 

  8. FitzGerald TJ, Urie M, Ulin K, et al. Processes for quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71(S1):S76–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Peters L, O’Sullivan B, Giralt J, et al. Critical impact of radiotherapy protocol compliance and plan quality in the treatment of advanced HNSCC: results from TROG 02.02. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(18):2996–3001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCarten KM, Rosen N, Friedman D, et al. Feasibility of real time diagnostic imaging central review in multicenter cancer trials. Boston, MA: ARRS; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by NIH/NCI U10 Grant CA29511, NIH/NCI/RRP: CA81647-09 and GSA Federal Supply IT schedule – GS-35F-0306J.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas J. FitzGerald .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

FitzGerald, T.J. et al. (2011). Quality Assurance of Clinical Trials in the Management of Cancer in the Head and Neck. In: Bernier, J. (eds) Head and Neck Cancer. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9464-6_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9464-6_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9463-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9464-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics