Skip to main content

Peak Oil, EROI, Investments, and Our Financial Future1

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Energy and the Wealth of Nations

Abstract

The expansion of the human population and the economies of the United States and many other nations in the past 100 years have been facilitated by a commensurate expansion in the use of fossil fuels. To many energy analysts that expansion of cheap fuel energy has been far more important than business acumen, economic policy, or ideology, although they too may be important [1–15]. Although we are used to thinking about the economy in monetary terms, those of us trained in the natural sciences consider it equally valid to think about the economy and economics from the perspective of the energy required to make it run. When one spends a dollar, we do not think just about the dollar bill leaving our wallet and passing to someone else’s. Rather, we think that to enable that transaction, to generate the good or service being purchased, an average of about 8,000 kiloJoules of energy (roughly the amount of oil that would fill a standard coffee cup) must be extracted and turned into roughly a half kilogram of carbon dioxide. Take the money out of the economy and it could continue to function through barter, albeit in an extremely awkward, limited, and inefficient way. Take the energy out and the economy would immediately contract. Cuba found this out in 1991 when the Soviet Union, facing its own oil production and political problems, cut off Cuba’s subsidized oil supply. Both Cuba’s energy use and its GDP declined immediately by about one third, groceries disappeared from market shelves within a week, and soon the average Cuban lost 20 lb [16]. Cuba subsequently learned to live, in some ways well, on about half the oil as previously, but the impacts were significant and the transition was difficult. Yet Cuba moved away from monocrop agriculture to food production. There are more rooftop gardens per capita in Havana than in any other city. The United States has become more efficient in using energy in recent decades, however, most of this is due to using higher-quality fuels, exporting heavy industry, and switching what we call economic activity (e.g., [15]), and many other countries, including efficiency leader Japan, are becoming substantially less efficient [17–20].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Derived from Hall, Charles A. S., Powers, Robert C. and William. Schoenberg. 2008. Peak Oil, EROI, investments and the economy in an uncertain future. pp. 113–136. In Renewable Energy Systems: Environmental and Energetic Issues. Pimentel, D., Ed.; Elsevier: London, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Soddy, F. (1926). Wealth, virtual wealth and debt. New York: E.P. Dutton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tryon FG. 1927. An index of consumption of fuels and water power. Journal of the American Statistical Association 22: 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cottrell, F. 1955. Energy and society. Dutton, NY: reprinted by Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The entropy law and the economic process. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Odum, H.T. 1972. Environment, power and society. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kümmel R. (1982). The impact of energy on industrial growth. Energy - The International Journal 7, 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kümmel, R. 1989. Energy as a factor of production and entropy as a pollution indicator in macroeconomic modelling. Ecological Economics 1, 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jorgenson D.W. (1984). The role of energy in productivity growth. The American Economic Review 74(2), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jorgenson D.W. 1988. Productivity and economic growth in Japan and the United States. The American Economic Review 78: 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daly, H. E. 1977. Steady-state economics. (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dung, T.H. 1992. Consumption, production and technological progress: A unified entropic approach. Ecological Economics, 6: 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall, C.A.S., Cleveland, C. J. and Kaufmann R. K. 1986. Energy and resource quality: The ecology of the economic process. (New York: Wiley Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ayres, R.U. 1996. Limits to the growth paradigm. Ecological Economics, 19, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ayres, R. U., and Benjamin Warr. 2009. The economic growth engine: how energy and work drive material prosperity. Edward Elger, Northhampton Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quinn, M. 2006. The power of community: How Cuba survived peak oil. Text and film. Published on 25 Feb 2002. Archived on 25 Feb 2006. Can be reached at megan@communitysolution.org

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaufmann, R. 2004. The mechanisms for autonomous energy efficiency increases: A cointegration analysis of the US Energy/GDP Ratio. The Energy Journal 25, 63–86.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall, C.A.S. & Ko, J.Y. 2006. The myth of efficiency through market economics: A biophysical analysis of tropical economies, especially with respect to energy, forests and water. (pp.40–58). In G. LeClerc & C. A. S. Hall (Eds.) Making world development work: Scientific alternatives to neoclassical economic Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press)

    Google Scholar 

  19. LeClerc & C. A. S. Hall (Eds.) 2006. Making world development work: Scientific alternatives to neoclassical economic theory: University of New Mexico Press. Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smil, V. 2007. Light behind the fall: Japan’s electricity consumption, the environment, and economic growth. Japan Focus, April 2.

    Google Scholar 

  21. EIA 2009. U.S. Energy Information Agency website, accessed June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Campbell, C. and J. Laherrere. 1998. The end of cheap oil. Scientific American (March), 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heinberg, R. 2003. The Party’s Over: Oil, War and the Fate of Industrial Societies. (Gabriella Island, B.C. Canada: New Society Publishers)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hubbert, M. K. 1969. Energy Resources. In Resources and Man. National Academy of Sciences. pp. 157–242 San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Strahan, D. 2007, The Last Oil Shock: A survival guide to the imminent extinction of petroleum man. Hachette Publisher, London.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Energyfiles.com Accessed August 2007. www.­energyfiles.com

  27. Deffeyes, K. 2005. Beyond oil: The view from Hubbert’s Peak. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux

    Google Scholar 

  28. EIA 2007. U.S. Energy Information Agency website, accessed June 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  29. IEA 2007 IEA. 2007. (European Energy Agency, web page, accessed August 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Campbell, C. (2005). The 2 nd half of the age of oil. Paper presented at the 5th ASPO Conference, Lisbon Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  31. Murphy, D., C. Hall and R. Powers. 2010. New perspectives on the energy return on (energy) investment (EROI) of corn ethanol. Environment, Development, Sustainability 13: 179–202.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hirsch, R., Bezdec, R. and Wending, R. 2005. Peaking of world oil production: impacts, mitigation and risk management. U.S. Department of Energy. National Energy Technology Laboratory. Unpublished Report.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lynch, M. C. 1996. The analysis and forecasting of petroleum supply: sources of error and bias. In D. H. E. Mallakh (Ed.) Energy Watchers VII. International Research Center for Energy and Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Adelman, M. A. and Lynch, M. C. 1997. Fixed view of resource limits creates undue pessimism. Oil and Gas Journal, 95, 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Duncan, R. C. 2000. Peak oil production and the road to the Olduvai Gorge. Keynote paper presented at the Pardee Keynote Symposia. Geological Society of America, Summit 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brandt, A. R. 2007. Testing Hubbert. Energy Policy 35: 3074–3088. Also energyfiles.com 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hallock, J., Tharkan, P., Hall, C., Jefferson, M. and Wu, W. 2004. Forecasting the limits to the availability and diversity of global conventional oil supplies. Energy 29,1673–1696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gagnon, N., C.A.S. Hall, and L. Brinker. 2009. A Preliminary Investigation of Energy Return on Energy Investment for Global Oil and Gas Production. Energies 2009, 2(3), 490–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ricardo, David. 1891. The principles of political economy and taxation. London: G. Bell and Sons. (Reprint of 3rd edition, originally pub 1821).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cleveland C. J., Costanza, R., Hall, C.A.S. & Kaufmann, R.K. 1984. Energy and the US economy: A biophysical perspective. Science, 225, 890–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hall, C., Lindenberger, D., Kummel, R., Kroeger, T. and Eichhorn, W., 2001. The need to reintegrate the natural sciences with economics. BioScience, 51: 663–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Odum, H.T. 1994, Ecological and general systems: an introduction to systems ecology. University Press of Coloirado, Niwot, CO, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hall, C. A. S. 1992. Economic development or developing economics? (pp. 101–126). In M. Wali (Ed.) Ecosystem rehabilitation in theory and practice, Vol I. Policy Issues The Hague, Netherlands: SPB Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  44. See review in Farrell, A. E., Plevin, R. J., Turner, B. T., Jones, A. D., O’Hare, M. and Kammen, D. M. 2006. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science Jan. 27 2006 and also the many letters on that article in Science Magazine, June 23, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Andersson, B. A., Azar, C., Holmerg, J. & Karlsson, S. 1998. Material constraints for thin-film solar cells. Energy, 23, 407–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gupta, A. In preparation

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cleveland, C. J. (2005). Net energy from the extraction of oil and gas in the United States. Energy: The International Journal, 30(5), 769–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. With thanks to : Millennium Institute. Data principally from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Extrapolations via the Millennium Institute’s T-21 model courtesy of Andrea Bassi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles A. S. Hall .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hall, C.A.S., Klitgaard, K.A. (2012). Peak Oil, EROI, Investments, and Our Financial Future1 . In: Energy and the Wealth of Nations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9398-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9398-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9397-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9398-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics