Abstract
Energy parameters of a Swedish long-term field experiment comparing organic and conventional agricultural systems were evaluated. There is great potential for misinterpretation of system comparisons as a result of choice of data and how energy data are expressed. For example, reported yields based on single crops and not the whole rotation can result in significantly different interpretations. Energy use per unit yield was lower in organic crop and animal production than in the corresponding conventional system, as previously found in other studies. This is due to the exclusion of N fertiliser, the largest energy input in conventional cropping systems. Energy use per unit yield expresses system efficiency, but the term is insufficient to evaluate the energy characteristics of agricultural systems. Calculation of the most important energy component, net energy production per unit area, showed that conventional systems produced far more energy per hectare than organic systems. The energy productivity (output/input ratio), i.e. the energy return on inputs, was at least six in both types of agriculture, revealing the highly positive energy balance of crop production in general. Lower yields in the organic systems, and consequently lower energy production per unit area, mean that more land is required to produce the same amount of energy. This greater land requirement in organic production must be considered in energy balances. When the same area of land is available for organic and conventional crop production, the latter allows for complementary bio-energy production and can produce all the energy required for farming, such as fuels, N fertilisers, etc., in the form of ethanol. In a complete energy balance, options such as combustion, gasification or use as fodder of protein residues from ethanol production must also be taken into account. There is a common belief that the high fossil fuel requirement in N fertiliser production is non-sustainable. This is a misconception, since the use of N fertilisers provides a net energy gain. If N fertilisers were to be completely replaced by biological N2 fixation, net energy production would be significantly lower. In addition, N fertiliser production can be based on renewable energy sources such as bio-fuels produced by gasification. Conventional crop production is thus energetically fully sustainable. Energy analyses of agricultural systems presented in this chapter illustrate that published data may require recalculation in relation to the background, prevailing trends and boundary conditions, and subsequent re-interpretation. New perspectives on energy use must also be considered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andrén, O., Kätterer, T., and Kirchmann, H., 2008, How will conversion to organic cereal production affect carbon stocks in Swedish agricultural soils? in: Organic Crop Production – Ambitions and Limitations, H. Kirchmann and L. Bergström, eds., Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Balwinder, P.S., and Fluck, R.C., 1993, Energy productivity of a production system: Analysis and measurement, Agric. Syst. 43: 415–437.
Baumann, H., and Tillman, A.-M., 2004, The Hitch-Hiker’s Guide to LCA, Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden, 543p.
Bergström, L., Bowman, B.T., and Sims, J.T., 2005, Definition of sustainable and unsustainable issues in nutrient management of modern agriculture, Soil Use Manage. 21: 76–81.
Bertilsson, G., 1993, Environmental consequences of different farming systems using good agricultural practices, International Fertiliser Society, Proceedings No. 332, York, UK.
Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Lammel, J., and Kuhlmann, H., 2004a, Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production, Eur. J. Agron. 20: 247–264.
Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Lammel, J., Barraclough, P., and Kuhlmann, H., 2004b, Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. II. The application to N fertiliser use in winter wheat production systems, Eur. J. Agron. 20: 265–279.
Bonny, S., 1993, Is agriculture using more and more energy? A French case study, Agric. Syst. 43: 51–66.
Carlgren, K., and Mattsson, L., 2001, Swedish soil fertility experiments, Acta Agric. Scand. (Section B) 51: 29–78.
Casey, J.W., and Holden, N.M., 2006, Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional agri-environmental scheme and organic Irish suckler-beef units, J. Environ. Qual. 35: 231–239.
Cederberg, C., and Mattsson, B., 2000, Life cycle assessment of milk production – a comparison of conventional and organic farming, J. Clean. Prod. 8: 49–60.
Cleveland, C.J., 1995, The direct and indirect use of fossil fuels and electricity in USA agriculture, 1910–1990, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 55: 111–121.
Connor, D., and Mingues, I., 2006, Looking at biofuels and bioenergy (Letters), Science 312: 1743.
Corré, W., Schröder, J., and Verhagen, J., 2003, Energy use in conventional and organic farming systems, Proceedings No. 511, International Fertiliser Society, York, UK.
Dalgaard, T., Halberg, N., and Porter, J., 2001, A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 87: 51–65.
Eckert, H., Breitschuh, G., and Sauerbeck, D., 1999, Kriterien umweltverträglicher Landbewirtschaftung (KUL) – ein Verfahren zur ökologischen Bewertung von Landwirtschaftsbetrieben, Agribiol. Res. 52: 57–76 (In German).
Finkbeiner, M., Inaba, A., Tan, R.B.H., Christiansen, K., and Klüppel, H.-G., 2006, The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044, Int. J. LCA 11: 80–85.
Fluck, R.C., 1992, Energy in World Agriculture, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 367p.
Hirst, E., 1974, Food-related energy requirements, Science 184: 134–138.
Horne, R.E., Mortimer, N.D., and Elsayed, M.A., 2003, Energy and carbon balances of biofuels production: Biodiesel and bioethanol, Proceedings No. 510. International Fertiliser Society, York, UK.
Hülsbergen, K.-J., and Kalk, W.-D., 2001, Energy balances in different agricultural systems – can they be improved? Proceedings No. 476, International Fertiliser Society, York, UK.
IFA, 2006, International Fertiliser Association, Statistics, www.fertiliser.org/ifa/statistics/indicators/ind_reserves.asp, Paris. Assessed July 2006.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization), 1997, Environmental management – life cycle assessment – Principles and framework, International Standard ISO 14040, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ivarson, J., and Gunnarsson, A., 2001, Försök med konventionella och ekologiska odlingsformer 1987–1998, Meddelande från Södra Jordbruksförsöksdistriktet. Nr.53, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Swden, SJFD-M-53-SE, 165p (In Swedish).
Jenssen, T.K., and Kongshaug, G., 2003, Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in fertiliser production, Proceedings No. 509, International Fertiliser Society, York, UK.
Jenssen, T.K., 2004, N2O emissions trading – implications for the European fertiliser industry, Proceedings No. 538, International Fertiliser Society, York, UK.
Jørgensen, U., Dalgaard, T., and Kristensen, E.S., 2005, Biomass energy in organic farming – the potential role of short rotation coppice, Biomass Bioenergy 28: 237–248.
Kirchmann, H., Bergström, L., Kätterer, T., Andrén, O., and Andersson, R., 2008, Can organic crop production feed the world? in: Organic Crop Production – Ambitions and Limitations, H. Kirchmann and L. Bergström, eds., Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Lefroy, E., and Rydberg, T., 2003, Emergy evaluation of three cropping systems in southwestern Australia, Ecol. Model. 161: 195–211.
Mäder, P., Fliesbach, A., Dubois, D., Gunst, L., Fried, P., and Niggli, U., 2002, Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming, Science 296: 1694–1697.
Martin, J.F, Diemont, S.A.W., Powell, E., Stanton, M., and Levy-Tacher, S., 2006, Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 115: 128–140.
Odum, H.T., 1996, Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 370p.
Pimentel, D., Hurd, L.E., Belloti, A.C., Forster, M.J., Oka, I.N., Sholes, O.O., and Whitman, R.J., 1973, Food production and the energy crisis, Science 182: 443–449.
Pimentel, D., 2006, Impacts of organic farming on the efficiency of energy use in agriculture, An organic center state of science review. www.organic-center.org/reportfiles/energy ssr.pdf. Assessed October 2006.
Ramirez, C.A., 2006, Monitoring energy efficiency in the food industry. SenterNovem, www.now.nl. Accessed June 2006.
Ratke, G.-W., Körschens, M., and Diepenbrock, W., 2002, Substance and energy balances in the “static fertilization experiment Bad Lauchstädt”, Archiv für Acker- und Pflanzenbau und Bodenkunde 48: 423–433.
Refsgaard, K., Halberg, N., and Kristensen, E.S., 1998, Energy utilization in crop and dairy production in organic and conventional livestock production systems, Agric. Syst. 57: 599–630.
Rydberg, T., and Jansén, J., 2002, Comparison of horse and tractor using emergy analysis, Ecol. Model. 19: 13–28.
Törner, L., 1999, Energibalans i ekologisk och anpassad-intgrerad växtodling, Internal Report, Odling i Balans, Sweden (In Swedish).
Uhlin, H.-E., 1998, Why energy productivity is increasing: an I-O analysis of Swedish agriculture, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 56: 443–465.
Uhlin, H.-E., 1999, Energy productivity of technological agriculture-lessons from the transition of Swedish agriculture, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 73: 63–81.
Van den Broek, R., Treffers, D-J., Meeusen, M., van Wijk, A., Nieuwlaar, E., and Turkenburg, W., 2001, Green energy or organic food. A life cycle analysis comparing two uses of set aside land, J. Indust. Ecol. 5: 65–87.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bertilsson, G., Kirchmann, H., Bergström, L. (2009). Energy Analysis of Organic and Conventional Agricultural Systems. In: Kirchmann, H., Bergström, L. (eds) Organic Crop Production – Ambitions and Limitations. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9316-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9316-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9315-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9316-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)