Skip to main content

The Cohort Study – Watchful Waiting

  • Chapter
It's Great! Oops, No It Isn't
  • 1731 Accesses

The cohort study, a natural and straight-forward approach to medical research offers investigators another tool to evaluate medical treatments. All sorts of heath data are collected on a set of people who are then followed to see what happens to them over time. Background data on participants who develop a disease are compared to those without the disease in hopes of findings what may be the cause of the ailment. Two successful major cohort studies, the Framingham Heart Study and the Nurses Health Study are described so readers can appreciate the cohort technique. Disadvantages such as cost and possible bias because of participant dropouts are also covered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 3 — The Cohort Study

Cited References

General References

  • Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. Br Med J 1996:312;1215–1218.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brody J. A study guide to scientific studies. New York Times Aug 11, 1998:7F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colditz G, Hankinson S, Hunter D, et al. The use of estrogens and progestins and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. New Engl J Med 1995:332;1589–1593.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colditz G, Rosner B, Speizer F. Risk factors for breast cancer according to family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer I 1996:88;1003–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson D, Kiel D, Anderson J, et al. Alcohol consumption and hip fractures: the Framingham study. Amer J Epidemiol 1988:128;1102–1110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grady D, Hulley S. Hormones to prevent coronary disease in women: when are observational studies adequate evidence? Ann Intern Med 2000:133;999–1001.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hankinson S, Manson J, Speizer F, et al. (eds). Healthy women, healthy lives: a guide to preventing disease, from the landmark Nurses' health study. New York: Simon&Schuster. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Medical School. Nurses' health study. http://www.channing. harvard.edu/nhs/index.html Feb 1, 2005.

  • Hu F, Bronner L, Willett W, et al. Dietary fat intake and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. New Engl J Med 1997:337;1491–1499.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolata G. New conclusions on cholesterol. New York Times Mar 9, 2004a:A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolata G. Scientists begin to question benefit of ‘good’ cholesterol. New York Times Mar 14, 2004b:A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health. National cholesterol education program. http://www.nhlbi.nih. gov/guidelinescholesterol/atp3xsum.pdf/May 15, 2001.

  • Stampfer M, Colditz G, Willett W, et al. Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease. Ten-year follow-up from the nurses' health study. New Engl J Med 1991:325;756–762.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szalavitz M. Risk: how HRT went from miracle therapy to health risk. STATS at George Mason University. http://www.stats.org/index.jsp Feb 27, 2006.

  • Szczcech L, Coladonato J, Owen W. Study designs and their potential influence on conclusions. Semin Dial 2002:15;207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talk of the Nation: Science Friday. Framingham heart study. http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/1998/Sep/hour2_092598.html Sep 25, 1998.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). The Cohort Study – Watchful Waiting. In: It's Great! Oops, No It Isn't. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8907-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics