The weaknesses of the postmarketing surveillance (PMS) system weren't the only problem the FDA had. Another burning issue was poor supervision of post-marketing studies that were to be conducted in return for an accelerated product review and approval. It was found that the agency had allowed drug companies to renege on performing the postmarketing trials. Analyses indicated that almost half of the promised studies remained unfinished. While the FDA had made enormous strides in improving the time to approve products, it had neglected its postmarket-ing responsibilities. This situation occurred because under a user-fee agreement, the industry paid the FDA to review their marketing application, but the money was only for functions related to those applications. In the meantime, the overall FDA budget was being cut and those reductions had a serious effect on other programs such as PMS. The downfall of Vioxx, a top selling pain drug illustrated the deepening negative image of the FDA. Congressional hearings and press stories painted a picture of overly aggressive drug marketing and negligent regulation by the FDA. Corrective action by Congress led to passage of the FDA Revitalization Act giving the agency the power to deal with many of the postmarketing problems it faced.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Chapter 25 — Regulatory Reform
Cited References
Food and Drug Administration. Report to Congress on postmarketing studies (FDAMA 130) Apr, 2002.
Health and Human Services. Office of Inspector General. Postmarketing studies of prescription drugs (OEI-03-94-00760) May, 1996.
Health and Human Services. Office of Inspector General. Monitoring of postmarketing study commitments (OEI-01-04-00390) June, 2006.
Health and Human Services. Office of Inspector General. The Food and Drug Administration's oversight of clinical trials (OEI-01-06-00160) Sep, 2007.
Markey E. Conspiracy of silence: how the FDA allows drug companies to abuse the accelerated approval process. Staff Summary of Responses by the Food and Drug Administration and the Securities and Exchange Commission to Correspondence from Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-MA). Executive Summary (pp 5–7). http://markey.house.gov/docs/health/iss_health_ rep050601.pdf Mar 9, 2007.
Waxman H. The lessons of Vioxx — drug safety and sales. New Engl J Med 2005:352;2576–2578.
General References
Alliance for Human Research Protection. Another deadly drug recalled — FDA asks Congress for power to dictate warnings. http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/05/03/01a.php Mar 1, 2005.
Belknap S, Lyons E, McKoy J, et al. Report card for accelerated FDA approval oncology drugs (1995–2003): is it time for a make-up test? J Clin Oncol 2004:22;6002.
Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A, et al. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofe-coxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. New Engl J Med 2000:343;1520–1528.
Bombardier C, Laine L, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. Response to expression of concern regarding VIGOR study. New Engl J Med 2006:354;1196–1199.
CBS News. 60 Minutes. FDA: harsh criticism from within. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/02/15/60II/main674293.shtml Feb 16, 2005.
Editorial. Manipulating a journal article. New York Times Dec 11, 2005:411.
Editorial. Reforming the F.D.A. New York Times May 3, 2007:A22.
Graham D, Campen D, Hui R, et al. Risk of acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in patients treated with cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: nested case-control study. Lancet 2005:365:475–481.
Harris G. F.D.A. leader says study tied to Vioxx wasn't suppressed. New York Times Nov 18, 2004:C7.
Harris G. Strong drug ties and less monitoring at F.D.A. New York Times Dec 6, 2004:A1.
Harris G. Report assails F.D.A. oversight of clinical trials. New York Times Sep 28, 2007:A1.
Kelly J. Harsh criticism lobbed at FDA in Senate Vioxx hearing. Medscape Medical News. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/538021 Nov 23, 2004.
Kweder S. U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. Statement of Sandra Kweder. http://64.233.161. 104/search?q=cache:ZWFzcfcI3qcJ:www.fda.gov/ola/2004/vioxx1118.html+ vioxx+ ispe+ kaiser&hl=en Nov 10, 2004.
Rockoff J. Congress acts to improve drug safety. Baltimore Sun. http://www.baltimoresun.com/ news/nation/bal-te.fda21sep21,0,2275298 Sep 21, 2007.
Rubin R. How did Vioxx debacle happen? USA Today Oct 12, 2004:D1.
Rubin R. Merck halts Vioxx sales; pain reliever linked to heart attack, stroke. US Today Oct 1, 2004:A1.
Solomon D, Schneeweiss S, Glynn R, et al. Relationship between selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and acute myocardial infarction in older adults. Circulation 2004:109:2068–2073.
Strom B. How the US drug safety system should be changed. JAMA 2006:295;2072–2075.
Szabo L. ‘Accelerated’ drugs raise concern. USA Today http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2005-03-09-fda-drugs_x.htm Mar 10, 2005.
U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. Testimony of David J. Graham. http://www.senate. gov/~finance/hearings/testimony/2004test/111804dgtest.pdf. Nov 18, 2004.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). Regulatory Reform – Changes Needed. In: It's Great! Oops, No It Isn't. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8907-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8907-7_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8906-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8907-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)