Skip to main content

Regulatory Reform – Changes Needed

  • Chapter
It's Great! Oops, No It Isn't
  • 1635 Accesses

The weaknesses of the postmarketing surveillance (PMS) system weren't the only problem the FDA had. Another burning issue was poor supervision of post-marketing studies that were to be conducted in return for an accelerated product review and approval. It was found that the agency had allowed drug companies to renege on performing the postmarketing trials. Analyses indicated that almost half of the promised studies remained unfinished. While the FDA had made enormous strides in improving the time to approve products, it had neglected its postmarket-ing responsibilities. This situation occurred because under a user-fee agreement, the industry paid the FDA to review their marketing application, but the money was only for functions related to those applications. In the meantime, the overall FDA budget was being cut and those reductions had a serious effect on other programs such as PMS. The downfall of Vioxx, a top selling pain drug illustrated the deepening negative image of the FDA. Congressional hearings and press stories painted a picture of overly aggressive drug marketing and negligent regulation by the FDA. Corrective action by Congress led to passage of the FDA Revitalization Act giving the agency the power to deal with many of the postmarketing problems it faced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 25 — Regulatory Reform

Cited References

  • Food and Drug Administration. Report to Congress on postmarketing studies (FDAMA 130) Apr, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health and Human Services. Office of Inspector General. Postmarketing studies of prescription drugs (OEI-03-94-00760) May, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health and Human Services. Office of Inspector General. Monitoring of postmarketing study commitments (OEI-01-04-00390) June, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health and Human Services. Office of Inspector General. The Food and Drug Administration's oversight of clinical trials (OEI-01-06-00160) Sep, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markey E. Conspiracy of silence: how the FDA allows drug companies to abuse the accelerated approval process. Staff Summary of Responses by the Food and Drug Administration and the Securities and Exchange Commission to Correspondence from Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-MA). Executive Summary (pp 5–7). http://markey.house.gov/docs/health/iss_health_ rep050601.pdf Mar 9, 2007.

  • Waxman H. The lessons of Vioxx — drug safety and sales. New Engl J Med 2005:352;2576–2578.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

General References

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Regulatory Reform – Changes Needed. In: It's Great! Oops, No It Isn't. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8907-7_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics