The process used in a case-control trial is examined and the strengths of the method described, especially its speed and flexibility. However, the obstacles and reservations associated with the technique are also discussed. The fact it only uncovers association rather than cause-and-effect relationships is highlighted. Ways to enhance the case-control method are provided. Based on the available evidence a conclusion is reached that the case-control method can lead researchers in the right direction, but not guarantee a definitive answer to a medical research question.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Chapter 2 & The Case-Control Method
General References
Brody J. A study guide to scientific studies. New York Times Aug 11,1998:7F.
Grimes D, Schulz K. Compared to what? Finding controls for case-control studies. Lancet 2005:365;1429–1433.
Herman J. Experiment and observation. Lancet 1994:344;1209–1211.
Hill G, Connelly J, Hebert R, et al. Neyman's bias re-visited. J Clin Epidemiol 2003:56;293–296.
Nelson N. Epidemiology in a nutshell. National Cancer Institute.http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/ benchmarks-vol2-issue7/page2 Jul 8, 2002.
Schulz K, Grimes D. Case control studies: research in reverse. Lancet 2002:359;431–434.
Wynder E, Stellman S. Artificial sweetener use and bladder cancer: a case-control study. Science 1980:207;1214–1216.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). The Case-Control Method – Looking Backwards. In: It's Great! Oops, No It Isn't. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8907-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8907-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8906-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8907-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)