Skip to main content

The Case-Control Method – Looking Backwards

  • Chapter
It's Great! Oops, No It Isn't
  • 1732 Accesses

The process used in a case-control trial is examined and the strengths of the method described, especially its speed and flexibility. However, the obstacles and reservations associated with the technique are also discussed. The fact it only uncovers association rather than cause-and-effect relationships is highlighted. Ways to enhance the case-control method are provided. Based on the available evidence a conclusion is reached that the case-control method can lead researchers in the right direction, but not guarantee a definitive answer to a medical research question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 2 & The Case-Control Method

General References

  1. Brody J. A study guide to scientific studies. New York Times Aug 11,1998:7F.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grimes D, Schulz K. Compared to what? Finding controls for case-control studies. Lancet 2005:365;1429–1433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herman J. Experiment and observation. Lancet 1994:344;1209–1211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hill G, Connelly J, Hebert R, et al. Neyman's bias re-visited. J Clin Epidemiol 2003:56;293–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson N. Epidemiology in a nutshell. National Cancer Institute.http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/ benchmarks-vol2-issue7/page2 Jul 8, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schulz K, Grimes D. Case control studies: research in reverse. Lancet 2002:359;431–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wynder E, Stellman S. Artificial sweetener use and bladder cancer: a case-control study. Science 1980:207;1214–1216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). The Case-Control Method – Looking Backwards. In: It's Great! Oops, No It Isn't. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8907-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics