What the public learns about medical research usually comes from newspapers, television, magazines and the Internet. This requires a journalist to translate a medical report into a newsworthy story, but the media and medical research professions each have a distinct method of operation, different standards and certainly different goals so that the communication between these two bodies can lead to incomplete and misleading articles. The media largely gets its information from press releases prepared by the organization that sponsored the medical research study and that can cause a lack of objectivity. Another source of information is a scientific conference where researchers present new work to colleagues, but the papers presented are usually a work-in-progress and based on exploratory research without the safeguards of peer review or thorough analysis. The way data are presented can influence a person's interpretation of the significance of a story and too often only the more sensational statistics makes it into print. Direct-to-consumer advertising by the drug industry is also an issue and the strong differences of opinion that exist are reviewed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Chapter 19 — Communicating
Cited References
Moynihan R, Bero L, Ross-Degnan D, et al. Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications.New Engl J Med 2000:342;1645–1650.
Schwartz L, Woloshin S, Baczek L. Media coverage of scientific meetings: too much, too soon.JAMA 2002:287; 2859–2863.
Woloshin S, Schwartz L. Translating research into news.JAMA 2002:287;2856–2858.
General References
Altman L. When peer review produces unsound science.New York Times June 11, 2002:F6.
American College of Physicians. Direct to consumer advertising for prescription drugs.http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:zdn-iwZYPbcJ:www.acponline.org/fcgi/search%3 Fq%3Dnt%26num%3D10%26site%3Ddefault_collection%26start%3D30 + %22American +College + of + Physicians%22 + Direct + to + Consumer + Advertising + For + Prescription+ Drugs+ Oct+ 9,+ 1998&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us Oct 9, 1998.
American College of Physicians. Direct to consumer advertising for prescription drugs.http://www.acponline.org/hpp/pospaper/dtcads.htm Oct 9, 1998.
Brody J. Separating gold from junk in medical studies.New York Times Oct 22, 2002:F7.
Cassels A. The media-medicine mix: quality concerns in medical reporting.Open Medicine.http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewArticle/54/4 Aug 1, 2007.
Eggner S. The power of the pen: medical journalism and public awareness.JAMA 1998:279;1400.
Fishman J, Casarett D. Mass media and medicine: when the most trusted media mislead.Mayo Clin Proc 2006:81;291–293.
Goldin R. Are Aleve's problems due to chance? Media ignores statistical significance in evaluating risk. Stats at George Mason University.http://www. stats.org/stories/are_aleve's _probs_jan12_05.htm Jan 12, 2005.
Gorner P. Medical studies make news, worthy or not; researchers see flaws in coverage.Chicago Tribune June 5, 2002:110.
Grady D. Medical journal cites misleading research.New York Times Nov 10, 1999:A18.
Horton R. The clinical trial: deceitful, disputable, unbelievable, unhelpful and shameful.Control Clin Trials 2001:22;593–604.
Picard A. How can we improve medical reporting? Let me count the ways.Int J Health Serv 2005:35;603–605.
Schwartz L, Woloshin S. The media matter: a call for straightforward medical reporting.Ann Intern Med 2004:140;226–228.
Stamm K, Williams J, Noël P, et al. Helping journalists get it right. A physician's guide to improving health care reporting.Gen Intern Med 2003:18;138–145.
Stats at George Mason University. Relative risk and causation.http://www.stats.org/in_depth/evaluate_healthrisks/health_risks_page5.htm Mar 1, 2002.
Voss M. Why reporters and editors get health coverage wrong. Nieman Reports 2003:57;46.
Zukerman D. Hype in health reporting “checkbook science” buys distortion of medical news. National Center for Policy Research for Women&Families.http://www.center4research.org/hypehlthrpt902.html. Oct 30, 2002.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). The Public Forum – Sharing the News with the Public. In: It's Great! Oops, No It Isn't. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8907-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8907-7_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8906-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8907-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)