The under-representation of any group in a research program amounts, not only to a decrease in study usefulness, it also represents a form of discrimination against the excluded groups. The neglected groups are deprived and disad-vantaged because the overall results from a clinical trial probably do not apply to them. The deprivation is especially focused on demographic attributes such as gender, age, ethnicity and cultural background. Based on these criteria, clinical trials have enlisted volunteers in disproportionate numbers for years and, as a result, their findings apply mainly to a single race (white), a single sex (male) and a single age group (21–55). Consequently, the under-represented groups are left in the dark about the value of new treatments that could help them and the risks they will face from taking recently introduced cannot be adequately understood. Although in recent years, important improvements have been made, the omission of these groups in the past reflects poorly on the medical research community and its passivity to remedy the problem. There is a continuing need to emphasize diversity in clinical trials. The medical research community should work with the FDA and Congress to come up with innovative ways to obtain that diversity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Chapter 11 — Research Discrimination
Cited References
Chalmers T. Ethical implications of rejecting patients for clinical trials. JAMA1990:263;825–830.
Groopman J. The pediatric gap. The New YorkerJan 10, 2005:32.
Peterson E, Lytle B, Biswas M, et al. Willingness to participate in cardiac trials. Am J Geriatr Cardiol2004:13;11–15.
Ridker P, Cook N, Lee I, et al. A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. New Eng J Med2005:352;1293–1304.
Rochon P, Berger P, Gordon M. The evolution of clinical trials: inclusion and representation. Can Med Assoc J1998:159;1373–1374.
Sternberg S. A bitter pill for older patients; excluded from drug trials, the elderly face unknown risks. USA TodayMay 5, 2005:D1.
General References
Baker B. Assessing the risks, benefits of clinical trials. AARP Bull Online.http://www.aarp.org /bulletin/yourhealth/Articles/a2003-07-11-clinicaltrials.htmlJune 30, 2006.
Blum A, Chalmers T. The Lugano statements on controlled clinical trials. J Int Med Res1987:15;2–22.
Caschetta M, Chavkin W, McGovern T. FDA policy on women in drug trialsNew Engl J Med1993:329;1815–1816.
Centerwatch. Clinical trials—a very human enterprise.http://www.centerwatch.com/patient/ifcn _ 01.html#Section5Feb 15, 2005.
Christie B. Doctors revise declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J2000:321;913.
Food and Drug Administration. Drug research and children.http://www.fda.gov/fdac/special/test-tubetopatient/children.htmlFeb 1, 2003. Food and Drug Administration. Medication and older people.http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/1997/697_old.html Sept 15, 2003.
Friedman M. Women and minorities guidance requirements. Food and Drug Administration. Center for Drug Evaluation and Researchhttp://www.fda.gov/CDER/guidance/women.pdfJuly 20, 1998.
Gauch R. Statistical methods for researchers made very simple. Lanham, MD: University Press of America 2000.
Greeley A. Concern about AIDS in minority communities. Food and Drug Administration.http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/095_aids.htmlDec 15, 1995.
Lowe C. Pediatrics: proper utilization of children as research subjects. Ann NY Acad Sci1970:169;337–344.
Lurie P, Wolfe M. Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus in developing countries. New Engl J Med1997:337;853–856.
Mastroianni A, Faber R. Women and health research: ethical and legal issues of including women in clinical studies. Washington, DC: National Academic Press. 1994.
Merkatz R, Temple R, Sobel S, et al. Women in clinical trials of new drugs — a change in food and drug administration policy. New Engl J Med1993:329;292–296.
Merton V. The exclusion of pregnant, pregnable and once-pregnant people (a.k.a. women) from biomedical research. Am J Law Med1993:19;369–451.
Okie S. Minorities less likely to be in HIV trials. Study finds divide in treatment access. Washington PostMay 2, 2002:A3.
Pickering T. Why is hypertension more common in African Americans?J Clin Hypertension2001:3;50–52.
Society for Women's Health Research. Sex difference in response to pharmaceuticals, tobacco and illicit drugs.http://www.womenshealthresearch.org/site/PageServer?pagename=hs_ facts _datAug 30, 2006.
Stein R. A gap in knowledge about kids' medication. Washington PostNov 23, 2007:A1.
Stolberg S. U.S. AIDS research in poor nations raises outcry on ethics. New York TimesSep 18, 1997:A1.
Stotland N. Gender-based biology. Amer J Psychiat2001:158;2093–2094.
Strom B, Melmon K, Miettinen O. Post-marketing studies of drug efficacy: why?Am J Med1985:78;475–480.
Studdert D, Brennan T. Clinical trials in developing countries: scientific and ethical issues. Med J Australia1998:169;545–548.
Wenger N. Exclusion of the elderly and women from coronary trials: is their quality of care compromised?JAMA1992:268;1460–1461.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). Research Discrimination – Inadequately Tested Populations. In: It's Great! Oops, No It Isn't. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8907-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8907-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8906-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8907-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)