Skip to main content

Gauge Independence in Optimization Algorithms for 3D Vision

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice (IWVA 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1883))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We attack the problem of coordinate frame dependence and gauge freedoms in structure-from-motion. We are able to formulate a bundle adjustment algorithm whose results are independent of both the coordinate frame chosen to represent the scene and the ordering of the images. This method is more efficient that existing approaches to the problem in photogrammetry.

We demonstrate that to achieve coordinate frame independent results, (i) Rotations should be represented by quaternions or local rotation parameters, not angles, and (ii) the translation vector describing the camera/scene motion should be represented in scene 3D coordinates, not camera 3D coordinates, two representations which are normally treated as interchangeable. The algorithm allows 3D point and line features to be reconstructed. Implementation is via the efficient recursive partitioning algorithm common in photogrammetry. Results are presented demonstrating the advantages of the new method in terms of the stability of the bundle adjustment iterations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K.B. Atkinson. Close Range Photogrammetry and Machine Vision. Whittles Publishing, Caithness, Scotland, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Azarbayejani and Alex P. Pentland. Recursive estimation of motion, structure, and focal length. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(6):562–575, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Bergevin, M. Soucy, H. Gagnon, and D. Laurendeau. Towards a general multiview registration technique. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(5):540–547, May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Gelb (ed). Applied Optimal Estimation. MIT press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.W. Fitzgibbon and A. Zisserman. Automatic camera recovery for closed or open image sequences. In Proc. 5th European Conf. on Computer Vision, Freiburg, volume 1, pages 311–326. Springer-Verlag, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. H. Golub and C. F. van Loan. Matrix Computations, 3rd edition. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Heuring and D. W. Murray. Visual head tracking and slaving for visual telepresence. In Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Q.-T. Luong and T. Viéville. Canonic representations for the geometries of multiple projective views. In Proc. 3rd European Conf. on Computer Vision, Stockholm, pages 589–599, May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. F. McLauchlan. Gauge invariance in projective 3d reconstruction. In IEEE Workshop on Multi-View Modeling and Analysis of Visual Scenes, Fort Collins, CO, June 1999, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Morris and K. Kanatani. Uncertainty modeling for optimal structure from motion. In Proc. ICCV’99 Vision Algorithms Workshop, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. L. Mundy and A. P. Zisserman, editors. Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.A. Beardsley, A. Zisserman, and D.W. Murray. Sequential updating of projective and affine structure from motion. International Journal of Computer Vision, 23(3), 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. X. Pennec and J.P. Thirion. A framework for uncertainty and validation of 3-d registration methods based on points and frames. International Journal of Computer Vision, 25(3):203–229, December1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Quan and T. Kanade. Affine structure from line correspondences with uncalibrated affine cameras. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(8):834–845, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C.J. Taylor and D.J. Kriegman. Structure and motion from line segments in multiple images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(11):1021–1032, November 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Weng, T. S. Huang, and N. Ahuja. Motion and structure from two perspective views: algorithms, error analysis and error estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(5):451–476, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

McLauchlan, P.F. (2000). Gauge Independence in Optimization Algorithms for 3D Vision. In: Triggs, B., Zisserman, A., Szeliski, R. (eds) Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice. IWVA 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1883. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44480-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44480-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67973-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44480-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics