Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Approche écologique de l’évaluation mnésique

  • Chapter
Évaluation des troubles neuropsychologiques en vie quotidienne

  • 926 Accesses

Résumé

Les évaluations de la mémoire classiquement proposées lors des bilans neuropsychologiques permettent d’isoler les mécanismes en jeu dans les difficultés mnésiques des patients cérébrolésés. Cependant, elles ne rendent pas toujours compte du retentissement des troubles mnésiques sur les activités de vie quotidienne, qui doit être évalué de manière spécifique. L’objectif de ce chapitre est de décrire les méthodes à la disposition des cliniciens pour identifier ces répercussions. Les données recueillies lors de l’entretien clinique, l’observation du patient dans son environnement, l’utilisation de questionnaires, d’agenda ou de check-list nous donnent des informations avant tout qualitatives. Elles doivent être complétées par des épreuves telles que des mises en situation ou des simulations d’activités, visant à évaluer les capacités du patient dans des situations proches de la vie quotidienne.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Van der Linden M, Meulemans T, Belleville S, Collette F (2000) L’évaluation des troubles de la mémoire. In: Seron X et Van der Linden M (eds) Traité de neuropsychologie clinique, tome I. Solal, Marseille, p 115–56

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sunderland A, Harris JE, Baddeley AD (1983) Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22: 341–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Juillerat Van der Linden AC (2003) Une approche écologique dans l’évaluation des troubles de la mémoire. In: Meulemans T, Desgranges B, Adam S et Eustache F (eds), Évaluation et prise en charge des troubles mnésiques. Solal, Marseille, p 267–80

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van der Linden M, Wyns C, Coyette F et al. (1989) Questionnaire d’auto-évaluation de la Mémoire. Bruxelles: Editest

    Google Scholar 

  5. Makatura TJ, Lam CS, Leahy BJ et al. (1999) Standardized memory tests and the appraisal of everyday memory. Brain Inj 13(5): 355–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Helmstaedter C, Hauff M, Elger CE (1998) Ecological validity of list-learning tests and self-reported memory in healthy individuals and those with temporal lobe epilepsy. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 20(3): 365–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Witkowski T, Enot-Joyeux F, Le Thiec F et al. (2004) Une évaluation écologique de la mémoire épisodique. Revue neurologique 4-C2

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddeley AD (1993) The Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley test Company. Traduction française: RBMT, Paris, ECPA

    Google Scholar 

  9. de Wall C, Wilson BA, Baddeley AD (1994) The Extended Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test: a measure of everyday memory performance in normal adults. Memory 2:149–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson BA, Clare L, Baddeley AD et al. (1999) The Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test — Extended version (RBMT-E). Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley test Company

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clare L, Wilson BA, Amslie H et al. (2000) Adapting the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test Extended version (RBMT-E) for people with restricted mobility. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 39: 363–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perez M, Godoy J (1998) Comparison between a “traditional” memory test and a “behavioural” memory battery in Spanish patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 20(4): 496–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tam SF, Man WK (2004) Evaluating computer-assisted memory retraining programmes for people with post-head injury amnesia. Brain Inj 18(5): 461–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crook Th III, Salama M, Gobert J (1986) A computerized test battery for detecting and assessing memory disorders. In: Bès A (ed), Senile dementia: early detection. John Libbey Eurotext.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van der Linden M, Wyn C (1991) L’évaluation des troubles de la mémoire. In: Bruyer R et Van der Linden M (eds), Neuropsychologie de la mémoire humaine. Presses universitaires de Grenoble, Edisem, p 139–62

    Google Scholar 

  16. Naldone MJ, Stringer AY (2001) Ecological validity in neuropsychological assessment: prediction of way finding. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 7: 675–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Crook Th III, Youngjohn JR, Larrabee GJ (1992) Multiple equivalent test forms in a computerized, everyday memory battery. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 7(3): 221–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wechsler D (1987) Wechsler Memory Scale — Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation. Traduction française: WMS-R (1991), Paris: ECPA. 3e édition: MEM III (2001), Paris ECPA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Buschke H (1973) Selective reminding for analysis of memory and learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12: 543–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Youngjohn JR, Larrabee GJ, Crook TH III (1991) First — last names and the grocery list selective reminding test: two computerized measures of everyday verbal learning. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 6: 287–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hannon R, Adams P, Harrington S et al. (1995) Effects of brain injury on prospective memory self-rating and performance. Rehabilitation Psychology 40: 289–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ceci SJ, Bronfenbrenner U (1985) “Don’t forget to take the cupcakes out of the oven”: prospective memory, strategic time-monitoring, and context. Child Dev 56(1): 152–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kinsella G, Murtagh D, Landry A et al. (1996) Everyday memory following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 10(7): 499–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Titov N, Knight RG (2001) A video-based procedure for the assessment of prospective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology 15: 61–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Titov N, Knight RG (2000) A procedure for testing prospective remembering in persons with neurological impairments. Brain Inj 14(10): 877–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Titov N, Knight RG (2005) A computer-based procedure for assessing functional cognitive skills in patients with neurological injuries: the virtual street. Brain Inj 19(5): 315–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brooks BM, Rose FD, Potter J et al. (2004) Assessing stroke patients’ prospective memory using virtual reality. Brain Inj 18(4): 391–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de médecine physique et réadaptation, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13

    C. Picq, E. Caron, P. Bruguière & P. Pradat-Diehl

Authors
  1. C. Picq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Caron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Bruguière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Pradat-Diehl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Picq, C., Caron, E., Bruguière, P., Pradat-Diehl, P. (2006). Approche écologique de l’évaluation mnésique. In: Évaluation des troubles neuropsychologiques en vie quotidienne. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-34365-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-34365-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-34364-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-34365-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation