Skip to main content

Using the TPTP Language for Writing Derivations and Finite Interpretations

  • Conference paper
Book cover Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4130))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

One of the keys to the success of the TPTP and related projects is their consistent use of the TPTP language. The ability of the TPTP language to express solutions as well as problems, in conjunction with the simplicity of the syntax, sets it apart from other languages used in ATP. This paper provides a complete definition of the TPTP language, and describes how the language should be used to write derivations and finite interpretations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benzmüller, C., Brown, C.: A Structured Set of Higher-Order Problems. In: Hurd, J., Melham, T. (eds.) TPHOLs 2005. LNCS, vol. 3603, pp. 66–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Caprotti, O., Carlisle, D.: OpenMath and MathML: Semantic Mark Up for Mathematics. ACM Crossroads 6(2) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Claessen, K., Sorensson, N.: New Techniques that Improve MACE-style Finite Model Finding. In: Baumgartner, P., Fermueller, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the CADE-19 Workshop: Model Computation - Principles, Algorithms, Applications (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Denney, E., Fischer, B., Schumann, J.: Using Automated Theorem Provers to Certify Auto-generated Aerospace Software. In: Basin, D., Rusinowitch, M. (eds.) IJCAR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3097, pp. 198–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Denzinger, J., Schulz, S.: Recording and Analysing Knowledge-Based Distributed Deduction Processes. Journal of Symbolic Computation 21, 523–541 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon, M., Melham, T.: Introduction to HOL, a Theorem Proving Environment for Higher Order Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hähnle, R., Kerber, M., Weidenbach, C.: Common Syntax of the DFG-Schwerpunktprogramm Deduction. Technical Report TR 10/96, Fakultät für Informatik, Universät Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hurd, J., Arthan, R.: OpenTheory, http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/jeh1004/research/opentheory

  9. Kohlhase, M.: OMDOC: Towards an Internet Standard for the Administration, Distribution, and Teaching of Mathematical Knowledge. In: Campbell, J.A., Roanes-Lozano, E. (eds.) AISC 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1930, pp. 32–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. McCune, W., Shumsky-Matlin, O.: Ivy: A Preprocessor and Proof Checker for First-Order Logic. In: Kaufmann, M., Manolios, P., Strother Moore, J. (eds.) Computer-Aided Reasoning: ACL2 Case Studies. Advances in Formal Methods, vol. 4, pp. 265–282. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCune, W.W.: Otter 3.3 Reference Manual. Technical Report ANL/MSC-TM-263, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schulz, S.: E: A Brainiac Theorem Prover. AI Communications 15(2-3), 111–126 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Schulz, S.: LOP-Syntax for Theorem Proving Applications, http://www4.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~schulz/WORK/lop.syntax

  14. Schulz, S., Bonacina, M.P.: On Handling Distinct Objects in the Superposition Calculus. In: Konev, B., Schulz, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on the Implementation of Logics, pp. 66–77 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steel, G.: Visualising First-Order Proof Search. In: Aspinall, C., Lüth, D. (eds.) Proceedings of User Interfaces for Theorem Provers 2005, pp. 179–189 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sutcliffe, G.: SystemOnTPTP. In: McAllester, D. (ed.) CADE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1831, pp. 406–410. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Sutcliffe, G.: Semantic Derivation Verification. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools ( page to appear, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sutcliffe, G.: The TSTP Solution Library, http://www.TPTP.org/TSTP

  19. Sutcliffe, G., Suttner, C.B.: The TPTP Problem Library: CNF Release v1.2.1. Journal of Automated Reasoning 21(2), 177–203 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Sutcliffe, G., Zimmer, J., Schulz, S.: TSTP Data-Exchange Formats for Automated Theorem Proving Tools. In: Zhang, W., Sorge, V. (eds.) Distributed Constraint Problem Solving and Reasoning in Multi-Agent Systems. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 112, pp. 201–215. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Urban, J.: MPTP - Motivation, Implementation, First Experiments. Journal of Automated Reasoning 33(3-4), 319–339 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Gelder, A., Sutcliffe, G.: Extending the TPTP Language to Higher-Order Logic with Automated Parser Generation. In: Furbach, U., Shankar, N. (eds.) IWSM 2000 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zimmer, J.: A New Framework for Reasoning Agents. In: Sorge, V., Colton, S., Fisher, M., Gow, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Agents and Automated Reasoning, 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 58–64 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sutcliffe, G., Schulz, S., Claessen, K., Van Gelder, A. (2006). Using the TPTP Language for Writing Derivations and Finite Interpretations. In: Furbach, U., Shankar, N. (eds) Automated Reasoning. IJCAR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11814771_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11814771_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37187-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37188-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics