Skip to main content

Supporting Problem Expression within a Co-evolutionary Design Framework

  • Chapter
Advances in Design

Abstract

From a generic point of view, the engineering design process can be considered as the transformation of needs into a complete product definition. Besides the needs, designers have to take into account some constraints. In this sense, the design process can be seen as a problem solving process, with some specific properties. Several models of the design process exist that consider this problem and its expression differently. We will question the consideration of the design problem in the classical approaches, and identify the relevance of co-evolutionary models to describe the design process, including its cognitive aspects. An activity-based co-evolutionary model of the design process is thus proposed, which defines and situates the objects implicated in evaluation and problem expression. A well-established design corpus is used to evaluate the relevance of the proposed approach to fit a real design process. The objective of the work described in this paper is to use this model as a basis to investigate the support of problem expression, and the activities that refer to it, in a concurrent engineering context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

15.8 References

  1. Simon, H., 1981, The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ishii, K., 1990, “Role of Computers in Concurrent Engineering”, ASME Computers in Engineering, Vol.1, pp. 217–224.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W., 1996, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer Verlag, 2nd edition, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Solhenius, G., 1992, “Concurrent Engineering,” Annals of CIRP, Vol. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Suh, N.P, 1990, The Principles of Design, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mortensen, N.H. and Andreasen, M.M., 1999, “Contribution to a Theory of Detailed Design,” 10° Symposium, Fertigungsgerechtes Konstruieren, V. 99-11, U. of Denmark, Schnaittach.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bonnardel, N. and Sumner, T., 1996, “Supporting Evaluation in Design,” Acta Psychologica, Vol. 91, pp 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Darses, F., Falzon, P. and Béguin, P. 1996, “Collective Design Processes,” Proc. of COOP’96, 2nd Int. Conf. on the Design of Cooperative Sys. INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suh, N.P, 2001, Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maher, M.L., Poon, J. and Boulanger, S., 1996, “Formalising Design Exploration as Co-Evolution: A Combined Gene Approach”, In: J.S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (eds), Adv. in Formal Design Methods for CAD, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cross, N. and Dorst, K., 2001, “Creativity in the Design Process: Co-evolution of Problem-Solution,” Design Studies, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brissaud D., Garro O. and Poveda O., 2003, “Design Process Rationale Capture and Support by Abstraction of Criteria,” Research In Engineering Design, Vol. 14-3, pp. 162–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lonchampt, P., Prudhomme, G. and Brissaud, D., 2003, “Assisting Designers in Evaluating Proposed Solutions throughout the Design Process,” Proceedings of ICED03, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zwolinski, P. and Prudhomme, G., 2003, “A Detailed Comparative Analysis of Two Mechanical Products with a Value Analysis Approach,” Proceedings of ICED03, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lindholm, D., Tate, D. and Harutunian, V., 1999, “Consequences of Design Decisions in Axiomatic Design,” Transactions of the Society for Design and Process Science (SDPS), Vol. 3 No4, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cross, N., Christiaans, H. and Dorst, K., 1997, Analysing Design Activity, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schueller, A. and Basson, A.H., 2003, “Case Study on Low Cost Distributed Conceptual Design Support for Small Teams,” Proc. of the CIRP Design Seminar’03, Grenoble, France.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lonchampt, P., Prudhomme, G., Brissaud, D. (2006). Supporting Problem Expression within a Co-evolutionary Design Framework. In: ElMaraghy, H.A., ElMaraghy, W.H. (eds) Advances in Design. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-210-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-210-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-004-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-210-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics