Skip to main content

Using Mixed Node Publication Network Graphs for Analyzing Success in Interdisciplinary Teams

  • Conference paper
Active Media Technology (AMT 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7669))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Large-scale research problems (e.g. health and aging, eonomics and production in high-wage countries) are typically complex, needing competencies and research input of different disciplines [1]. Hence, cooperative working in mixed teams is a common research procedure to meet multi-faceted research problems. Though, interdisciplinarity is – socially and scientifically – a challenge, not only in steering cooperation quality, but also in evaluating the interdisciplinary performance. In this paper we demonstrate how using mixed-node publication network graphs can be used in order to get insights into social structures of research groups. Explicating the published element of cooperation in a network graph reveals more than simple co-authorship graphs. The validity of the approach was tested on the 3-year publication outcome of an interdisciplinary research group. The approach was highly useful not only in demonstrating network properties like propinquity and homophily, but also in proposing a performance metric of interdisciplinarity. Furthermore we suggest applying the approach to a large research cluster as a method of self-management and enriching the graph with sociometric data to improve intelligibility of the graph.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ziefle, M., Röcker, C., Wilkowska, W., Kasugai, K., Klack, L., Möllering, C., Beul, S.: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Ambient Assisted Living. In: Röcker, C., Ziefle, M. (eds.) E-Health, Assistive Technologies and Applications for Assisted Living, pp. 76–93. IGI Global, Hershey (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs, J.A., Frickel, S.: Interdisciplinarity: A Critical Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, pp. 43–65. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bordons, M., Zulueta, M.A., Romero, F., Barrigón, S.: Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: The effects of the multidisciplinary research programme. Scientometrics 46, 383–398 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F., Uzzi, B.: The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science 316, 1036–1039 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Holzinger, A.: Successful Management of Research & Development. BoD–Books on Demand (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ziefle, M., Jakobs, E.M.: New challenges in Human Computer Interaction: Strategic Directions and Interdisciplinary Trends. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing Technologies, pp. 389–398. University of Stellenbosch, South Africa (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lattuca, L.R.: Learning interdisciplinarity - Sociocultural perspectives on academic work. J. High. Educ. 73, 711–+(2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marzano, M., Carss, D.N., Bell, S.: Working to make interdisciplinarity work: Investing in communication and interpersonal relationships. J. Agric. Econ. 57, 185–197 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cummings, J.N., Kiesler, S.: Who collaborates successfully?: prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 437–446. ACM, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson, E.V., Lankton, N.K.: Interdisciplinary research and publication opportunities in information systems and healthcare. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 14, 332–343 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nedbal, D., Auinger, A., Hochmeier, A., Holzinger, A.: A Systematic Success Factor Analysis in the Context of Enterprise 2.0: Results of an Exploratory Analysis Comprising Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives. E-Commerce and Web Technologies, 163–175 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grahl, J., Sand, B., Schneider, M., Schwind, M.: Publication Network Analysis of an Academic Family in Information Systems. In: Heinzl, A., Buxmann, P., Wendt, O., Weitzel, T. (eds.) Theory-Guided Modeling and Empiricism in Information Systems Research, pp. 1–13. Physica-Verlag HD (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., Zitt, M.: Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis. Scientometrics 70, 859–880 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cronin, B.: Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science 27, 1–7 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leydesdorff, L.: Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58, 1303–1319 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moreno, J.L.: Foundations of sociometry: An introduction. Sociometry, 15–35 (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Agasisti, T., Catalano, G., Landoni, P., Verganti, R.: Evaluating the performance of academic departments: an analysis of research-related output efficiency. Research Evaluation 21, 2–14 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wolf, G., Carmichael, A., Kelly, K.: The quantified self. TED (2010), http://www.ted.com/talks/gary_wolf_the_quantified_self.html

  19. Strecher, V.J., DeVellis, B.M., Becker, M.H., Rosenstock, I.M.: The Role of Self- Efficacy in Achieving Health Behavior Change. Health Educ. Behav. 13, 73–92 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Calero Valdez, A., Ziefle, M., Alagöz, F., Holzinger, A.: Mental Models of Menu Structures in Diabetes Assistants. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6180, pp. 584–591. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M.: Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shermer, M.: Agenticity. Scientific American 300(6), 36 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Premack, D.: The infant’s theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition 36, 1–16 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tarjan, R.: Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. In: 12th Annual Symposium on Switching and Automata Theory, pp. 114–121 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brandes, U.: A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality*. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25, 163–177 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, P10008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lambiotte, R., Delvenne, J.C., Barahona, M.: Laplacian dynamics and multiscale modular structure in networks. Arxiv preprint arXiv:0812.1770 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Holzinger, A.: On Knowledge Discovery and Interactive Intelligent Visualization of Biomedical Data - Challenges in Human–Computer Interaction & Biomedical Informatics. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications, Rome, Italy, pp. IS9–IS20 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M.: Smart clothing: Perceived benefits vs. perceived fears. In: 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), pp. 601–608 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M.: Potential of e-Travel Assistants to Increase Older Adults’ Mobility. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 138–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Calero Valdez, A., Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M.: State of the (net) work address Developing criteria for applying social networking to the work environment. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation 41, 3459–3467 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Calero Valdez, A., Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M., Holzinger, A., Jeschke, S., Brecher, C. (2012). Using Mixed Node Publication Network Graphs for Analyzing Success in Interdisciplinary Teams. In: Huang, R., Ghorbani, A.A., Pasi, G., Yamaguchi, T., Yen, N.Y., Jin, B. (eds) Active Media Technology. AMT 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7669. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35236-2_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35236-2_61

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35235-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35236-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics