Skip to main content

Automated Linguistic Personalization of Targeted Marketing Messages Mining User-Generated Text on Social Media

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2015)

Abstract

Personalizing marketing messages for specific audience segments is vital for increasing user engagement with advertisements, but it becomes very resource-intensive when the marketer has to deal with multiple segments, products or campaigns. In this research, we take the first steps towards automating message personalization by algorithmically inserting adjectives and adverbs that have been found to evoke positive sentiment in specific audience segments, into basic versions of ad messages. First, we build language models representative of linguistic styles from user-generated textual content on social media for each segment. Next, we mine product-specific adjectives and adverbs from content associated with positive sentiment. Finally, we insert extracted words into the basic version using the language models to enrich the message for each target segment, after statistically checking in-context readability. Decreased cross-entropy values from the basic to the transformed messages show that we are able to approach the linguistic style of the target segments. Crowdsourced experiments verify that our personalized messages are almost indistinguishable from similar human compositions. Social network data processed for this research has been made publicly available for community use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gunsch, M.A., Brownlow, S., Haynes, S.E., Mabe, Z.: Differential forms linguistic content of various of political advertising. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 44, 27–42 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitis, E.: Ads - Part of our lives: Linguistic awareness of powerful advertising. Word and Image 13, 304–313 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kover, A.J.: Copywriters’ Implicit Theories of Communication: An Exploration. Journal of Consumer Research 21, 596–611 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lowrey, T.M.: The effects of syntactic complexity on advertising persuasiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology 7, 187–206 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwartz, H.A., Eichstaedt, J.C., Kern, M.L., Dziurzynski, L., Ramones, S.M., Agrawal, M., Shah, A., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., Seligman, M.E.P., Ungar, L.H.: Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PLoS ONE 8, e73791 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Furuta, R., Plaisant, C., Shneiderman, B.: Automatically transforming regularly structured linear documents into hypertext. Electron. Publ. Origin. Dissem. Des. 2, 211–229 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thuy, P.T.T., Lee, Y.K., Lee, S.Y.: DTD2OWL: Automatic Transforming XML Documents into OWL Ontology. In: ICIS 2009, pp. 125–131 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, F., Weng, F., Wang, B., Liu, Y.: Insertion, deletion, or substitution?: Normalizing text messages without pre-categorization nor supervision. In: HLT 2011, pp. 71–76 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barzilay, R., Elhadad, M.: Using lexical chains for text summarization. In: Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, pp. 111–121 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burstein, J., Shore, J., Sabatini, J., Lee, Y.W., Ventura, M.: The automated text adaptation tool. In: NAACL Demonstrations 2007, pp. 3–4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chandrasekar, R., Doran, C., Srinivas, B.: Motivations and methods for text simplification. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 1996, vol. 2, pp. 1041–1044. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Belder, J., Moens, M.F.: Text simplification for children. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR Workshop on Accessible Search Systems, pp. 19–26 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feng, L., Jansche, M., Huenerfauth, M., Elhadad, N.: A comparison of features for automatic readability assessment. In: COLING 2010, pp. 276–284 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tausczik, Y.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29, 24–54 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tan, C., Lee, L., Pang, B.: The effect of wording on message propagation: Topic- and author-controlled natural experiments on Twitter. In: ACL 2014, pp. 175–185 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bryden, J., Funk, S., Jansen, V.: Word usage mirrors community structure in the online social network twitter. EPJ Data Science 2 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., West, R., Jurafsky, D., Leskovec, J., Potts, C.: No country for old members: User lifecycle and linguistic change in online communities. In: WWW 2013, pp. 307–318 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hu, Y., Talamadupula, K., Kambhampati, S.: Dude, srsly?: The Surprisingly Formal Nature of Twitter’s Language. In: ICWSM 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C.D., Singer, Y.: Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In: NAACL 2003, pp. 173–180 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Socher, R., Bauer, J., Manning, C.D., Ng, A.Y.: Parsing with compositional vector grammars. In: ACL 2013, pp. 455–465 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.: A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In: SIGIR 2001, pp. 334–342 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abney, S.P.: Parsing by chunks. In: Principle-Based Parsing, pp. 257–278. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bird, S., Klein, E., Loper, E.: Natural Language Processing with Python: Analyzing Text with the Natural Language Toolkit. O’Reilly, Beijing (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. De Smedt, T., Daelemans, W.: Pattern for Python. JMLR 13, 2063–2067 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fleiss, J.L.: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 76, 378–382 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rishiraj Saha Roy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Roy, R.S., Padmakumar, A., Jeganathan, G.P., Kumaraguru, P. (2015). Automated Linguistic Personalization of Targeted Marketing Messages Mining User-Generated Text on Social Media. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9042. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18116-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18117-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics