Skip to main content
Log in

Untangling myths and facts: Who supported the Québec Charter of Values?

  • Data, Measures and Methods
  • Published:
French Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

In 2013–2014, the Parti Québécois’ (PQ) Québec Charter of Values was hotly debated in the province of Quebec and the rest of Canada. For some Canadians, it was seen as a calculated move from the PQ to win a majority in the next provincial election, highlighting the stereotypical Quebec citizen’s aversion towards immigrants. For others, it was an important policy that confirmed the secular status of Quebec. The media played a large role in depicting the average Charter supporter. The goal of this study is to empirically test the claims regarding the sociodemographic profile of the Charter’s supporters. Using opinion poll data, we demonstrate that most of these assumptions were false, and that the nature of the support evolved during the debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The specific questions for each of the variables are available in Appendix A.

References

  • Allport, G. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L.M. (2002) Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior 24 (2): 117–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastien, F., Bélanger, É. and Gélineau, F. (dir) (2013) Les québécois aux urnes. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, S. (2013) La stratégie de la peur. La Presse 24 September: A23.

  • Boivin, S. (2013) Des gains nets pour la Charte. Le Soleil 12 November: 3.

  • Bouchard, G. (2012) L’interculturalisme. Montréal: Boréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbeil, M. (2013) La charte et le PQ comparés au Tea Party. Le Soleil 13 November: 16.

  • David, M. (2014) Les vieux péquistes. Le Devoir 23 January: A3.

  • Espenshade, T.J. and Hempstead, K. (1996) Contemporary American attitudes toward U.S. immigration. International Migration Review 30 (2): 535–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, B.J., Kuklinski, J.H., Quirk, P.J., Peyton, B. and Verkuilen, J. (2007) Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics 69 (4): 957–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilbault, J. (2013) Lettre d’un souverainiste mou au PQ. La Presse 23 October: A29.

  • Hayes, B.C. and Dowds, L. (2006) Social contact, cultural marginality or economic self-interest? Attitudes towards immigrants in Northern Ireland. Journal of Ethnics and Migration Studies 32 (3): 455–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, M.R. and Crane, M. (1986) Some of my best friends are black … : Interracial friendship and whites’ racial attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (4): 459–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Tomz, M. and Wittenberg, J. (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Tomz, M. and Wittenberg, J. (2003) CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. 2.1 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. 5 January. Available at http://gking.harvard.edu/.

  • O’Rourke, K.H. (2006) The determinants of individual attitudes towards immigration. European Journal of Political Economy 22 (4): 838–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, F. (2014) Appeler un chat un chien. Le Devoir 15 January: A7.

  • Pettigrew, T.F. (1997) Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23 (2): 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richez, E. and Bodet, A.M. (2012) Fear and disappointment: Explaining the persistence of support for Quebec secession. Journal of Elections, Public Opinions and Parties 22 (1): 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheve, K.F. and Slaughter, M.J. (2001) Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy. Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (1): 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C.G. et al (2013) A dual process model of attitudes towards immigration: Person x residential area effects in a national sample. Political Psychology 34 (4): 553–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.C. (1998) How white attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations: Numbers count. American Sociological Review 63 (4): 512–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank CROP for the data, and the Fonds de recherche du Québec - Société et culture for its financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Tessier.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Appendix: Questions

Vote intention: If a provincial election were held today in Quebec, which of the following parties would you vote for? Would it be …

Age: Which of the following age groups do you belong to?

Education: What is the highest level of education that you have completed?

Income: In which of the following categories would you put the total annual income, before taxes and deductions, of all members of your household, including yourself?

Language: What is your mother tongue, that is, the first language you learned and can still speak?

Gender: Are you a man or a woman?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tessier, C., Montigny, É. Untangling myths and facts: Who supported the Québec Charter of Values?. Fr Polit 14, 272–285 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/fp.2016.1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fp.2016.1

Keywords

Navigation