Skip to main content
Log in

Empirical Derivation of a Sequence of User Stereotypes for Language Learning

  • Published:
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work described here pertains to ICICLE, an intelligent tutoring system for which we have designed a user model to supply data for intelligent natural language parse disambiguation. This model attempts to capture the user's mastery of various grammatical units and thus can be used to predict the grammar rules he or she is most likely using when producing language. Because ICICLE's user modeling component must infer the user's language mastery on the basis of limited writing samples, it makes use of an inferencing mechanism that will require knowledge of stereotypic acquisition sequences in the user population. We discuss in this paper the methodology of how we have applied an empirical investigation into user performance in order to derive the sequence of stereotypes that forms the basis of our modeling component's reasoning capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, J.: 1995, Natural Language Understanding. California: Benjamin/Cummings, second edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, N., Madden, C. and Krashen, S. D.: 1974, Is there a ‘natural sequence’ in adult second language learning?. Language Learning 24 (2), 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. and Cokely, D.: 1980, American Sign Language:A Teacher's Resource Text on Grammar and Culture. Silver Spring, MD: TJ Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, S., Brna, P. and Pain, H.: 1995, Extending the scope of the student model. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 5 (1),45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carletta, J.: 1996, Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks:The Kappa Statistic. Computational Linguistics 22 (2), 249–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carletta, J., Isard, A., Isard, S., Kowto, J. C., Doherty-Sneddon, G. and Anderson, A. H.: 1997, The Reliability of a Dialogue Structure Coding Scheme. Computational Linguistics 23 (1),13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charrow, V. R.: 1975, A psycholinguistic analysis of Deaf English. Sign Language Studies 7, 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charrow, V. R. and Fletcher, J. D.: 1974, English as the Second Language of Deaf Children. Developmental Psychology 10 (4), 463–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charrow, V. R. and Wilbur, R. B.: 1975, The Deaf Child as a Linguistic Minority. Theory into Practice 14(5), 353–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corder, S. P.: 1967, The Significance of Learners' Errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5(4), 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, M. C., Maluf A. and Jiu, J.:1996, User-expertise modeling with empirically derived probabilistic implication networks.User modeling and user-adapted interaction 5 (3/4), 283–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulay, H. C.and Burt, M. K.: 1975,Natural Sequences in Child Second Language Acquisition. Language Learning 24 (1).

  • Ellis, R.: 1994, The Study of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S.: 1979, Language Transfer and Universal Grammatical Relations. Language Learning 29(2), 327–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R., Lesgold, A. and Lajoie, S.: 1987, Toward a cognitive theory for the measurement of achievement. In: R.R. Ronning, J.A. Glover, J.C. Conoley,and J.C. Witt (eds.):The Influence of Cognitive Psychology on Testing,Vol.3 of Buros-Nebraska Symposium on Measurement and Testing.New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Chapt. 3, pp. 41–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins,J.:1995,Computers and English Language Learning.Norwood,New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

  • Krashen, S.D.:1982,Principles and Practice n Second Language Acquisition.New York: Pergamon Press.

  • Larsen-Freeman, D.E.:1976,An explanation for the Morpheme Acquisition Order of Second Language Learners.Language Learning 25 (1),125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matz,M.:1982,Towards a process model for high school algebra errors.In:D. Sleeman and J. Brown (eds.):Intelligent Tutoring Systems,Computers and People Series.Academic Press,Chapt.2,pp.25–50.

  • McCoy, K.F., Pennington, C.A.and Suri, L.Z.:1996,English Error Correction:A Syntactic User Model Based on Principled Mal-rule Scoring.In:Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on User Modeling.Kailua-K na, Hawaii,pp.59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaud, L.N.:2002,Modeling User Interlanguage in a Second Language Tutoring System for Deaf Users of American Sign Language.Ph.D.thesis,Dept.f Computer and Information Sciences,University of Delaware.Tech.Report #2002–08.

  • Michaud, L.N.and McCoy, K.F.:1998,Planning Text in a System for Teaching English as a Second Language to Deaf Learners.In:Proceedings of Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Assistive Technology,an AAAI '98 Workshop.Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaud, L.N.and McCoy, K.F.:2000,Supporting Intelligent Tutoring in CALL By Modeling the User's Grammar.In:Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS-2000).Orlando,Florida, pp.50–54.

  • Michaud, L.N.and McCoy, K.F.:2001,Error Prfiling:Toward a Model of English Acquisition for Deaf Learners.In:Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.Toulouse,France,pp.386–393.

  • Michaud, L.N.and McCoy, K.F.:2003,Evaluating a Model to Disambiguate Natural Language.In:P.Brusilovsky, A. Corbett,and F. de Rosis (eds.):Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on User Modeling,Vol.2702 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence.Johnstown,PA,pp.96–105.

  • Michaud, L.N., McCoy, K.F.and Pennington, C.A.:2000,An Intelligent Tutoring System for Deaf Learners of Written English.In:Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM SIGCAPH Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS 2000).Washington, D.C.

  • Michaud, L.N., McCoy, K.F.and Stark, L.A.:2001,Modeling the Acquisition of English: An Intelligent CALL Approach.In:M.Bauer, P.J. Gmytrasiewicz,and J.Vassileva (eds.):Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on User Modeling,Vol.2109 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence.Sonthofen,Germany,pp.14–23.

  • Milne,S., Shiu, E.and Cook,J.:1996,Development of a Model of User Attributes and its Implementation with an Adaptive Tutoring System.User modeling and user-adapted interaction 6 (4),303–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, Hugh, B.,J., Deerfield,I. David, W.and Ropelewski, A.J.:1998,Sequence Analysis Tutorials:A Tutorial n Searching Sequence Databases and Sequence Sc ring Methods.Biomedical Supercomputing Initiative of the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC),Carnegie Mell on University and University of Pittsburgh,http:// www.psc.edu/biomed/training/tutorials/sequence/db/.

  • Padden, C.and Ramsey,C.:1998,Reading Ability in Signing Deaf Children.Topics in Language Disorders 18 (4),30–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pienemann, M.and Häkansson,G.:1999,A Unified Approach Toward the Development of Swedish as L2:A Processability Account.Studies on Second Language Acquisition 21, 383–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, S.P., Power, D.J.and Steinkamp, M.W.:1977,The Language Structure of Deaf Children.The Volta Review 79 (2),73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich,E.:1979,User Modeling via Stereotypes.Cognitive Science 3,329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. and McCoy, K.F.: 1998, Recognizing Syntactic Errors in the Writing of Second Language Learners. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the Seventeenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics,V l.2.Université Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada, pp.1198–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B.D.:1998,On Tw Hyp theses f Transfer in L2A:Minimal Trees and Absolute L1 Influence '.In:S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono, and W. O'Neil (eds.):The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition.Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,Chapt.3, pp.35–59.

  • Schwartz, B.D.and Sprouse, R.A.:1996,L2 Cognitive States and the Full Transfer/Full Access model.Second Language Research 12 (1),40–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.F.and Waterman, M.S.:1981,The Identification of Common Molecular Subsequences.Journal of Molecular Biology 147 (1),195–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spada,H.:1993,How the Role f Cognitive Modeling for Computerized Instruction is Changing.In:P.Brna, S. Ohlss n,and H.Pain (eds.):Proceedings of AI-ED '93,World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education.Edinburgh,Scotland,pp.21–25.Invi-ted talk.

  • Stewart, D.A.:2001,Pearls of Wisdom:What Stokoe told us About Teaching Deaf Children. Sign Language Studies 1 (4),344–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, W.C.:1976,The Study and Use of Sign Language.Sign Language Studies 10,1–36.

  • Suri, L.Z.:1993,Extending F cusing Frameworks to Process Complex Sentences and to Correct the Written English of Proficient Signers f American Sign Language. Ph.D.thesis,Department of Computer and Information Sciences,University of Delaware.Technical Report TR-94–21.

  • Suri, L.Z.and McCoy, K.F.:1993,A Methodology for Developing an Error Taxonomy for a Computer Assisted Language Learning Tool for Second Language Learners.Technical Report TR-93-16,Department of Computer and Information Sciences,University of Delaware.

  • Swisher, M.V.:1989,The Language-Learning Situation of Deaf Students.TESOL Quarterly 23 (2),239–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S.:1986,Thought and Language.Cambridge,Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Translation revised and edited by Alex Kozulin;riginally published in 1934.

  • Ward, Joe. H.,J.:1963,Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function.Journal of the American Statistical Association 58,236–244.

  • Wilbur, R.B.:1977,An Explanation of Deaf Children's Di culty with Certain Syntactic Structures of English.The Volta Review 79 (2),85–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michaud, L.N., McCoy, K.F. Empirical Derivation of a Sequence of User Stereotypes for Language Learning. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 14, 317–350 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:USER.0000043398.04349.b7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:USER.0000043398.04349.b7

Navigation