Skip to main content
Log in

Employment and Disability: Evidence from the 1996 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between employment and disability has gained national attention, as the ability to maintain employment is inconsistent among those with limitations. This cross-sectional study of employment among individuals (N= 1691, age 21–62 years) with self-reported limitations in the 1996 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey seeks to identify predictors of employment despite physical and/or cognitive limitations. Two predictive models of employment including 10 variables are explored; 1 included insurance (χ2 =3856.85, p ≤ 0.00) and the other removed the insurance variable (χ2 =280.21, p ≤ 0.00). Individuals with limitations who are employed are more likely to have a college-level education, have better physical and mental health perceptions and have private insurance. This analysis demonstrates that people do work despite reported activity, functional or sensory limitations and that socioeconomic factors are crucial in why someone is able to attain employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. General Accounting Office. Welfare Reform: Former TANF Recipients With Impairments Less Likely to be Employed and More Likely to Receive Federal Supports, GAO-03-210. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office, December 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Social Security Administration. Annual Statistical Annual Statistical Report on the Social Security Disability Insurance Program, 2000. Retrieved January 2, 2003 from http://www.ssa.gov/notices/supplemental-security-income/

  3. Franche, R-L, Krause, N. Readiness for return to work following injury of illness: Conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occupational Rehabil 2002; 12: 233-256.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fauerbach, JA, Engrav, L, Kowalske, K, Brych, S, Bryant, A, Lawrence, J, Li, G, Munster, A, de Lateur, B. Barriers to employment among working-aged patients with major burn injury. J Burn Care Rehabil 2001; 22: 26-34.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tanttula, K, Vuola, J, Asko-Seljavaara, S. Return to employment after burn. Burns 1997; 23: 341-344.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keyser-Marcus, LA, Bricout, JC, Wehman, P, Campbell, LR, Cifu, DX, Englander, J, High, W, Zafonte,, RD. Acute predictors of return to employment after traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 635-641.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yelin, E. The earnings, income, and assets of persons aged 51-61 with and without musculoskeletal conditions. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 2024-2030.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ahlgren, C, Hammarstrom, A. Has increased focus on vocational rehabilitation led to an increase in young employees' return to work after work-related disorders? Scand J Public Health 1999; 27: 220-227.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hennessy, J, Muller, S. Work efforts of disabled-worker beneficiaries: Preliminary findings from the new beneficiary follow up survey. Soc Secur Bull 1994; 57: 42-51.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Turner, JA, Franklin, G, Turk, DC. Predictors of chronic disability in injured workers: A systematic literature synthesis. Am J Ind Med 2000; 38: 707-722.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feuerstein, M, Menz, L, Zastowny, T, Barron, B. Chronic back pain and work disability: vocational outcomes following multidisciplinary rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 1994; 4: 229-250.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Teassel, RW, Bombardier, C. Employment-related factors in chronic pain and chronic pain disability. Clin J Pain 2001; 17: S39-S45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Curtis, P. A back-to-work strategy can protect your benefits. Positive Living. 1999; 8(2): 39, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. James, J. Disability benefits: New law will help disabled return to work. AIDS Treat News 2000; 334: 7-8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. ICF, Geneva: WHO, 2001.

  16. Mayfield, JA, Deb, P, Whitecotton, E. Work disability and diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 1105-1109.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration. Frequently Asked Questions About COBRA Continuation Health Coverage. Retrieved April 15, 2003 from http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/

  18. Mitra, S, Brucker, D. (in press), The early intervention project: An innovative initiative to return Social Security applicants to work. J Disab Policy Stud.

  19. Grzywacz, JG, Dooley, D. Good jobs to bad jobs: Replicated evidence of an employment continuum from two large surveys. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 1749-1760.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia A. Findley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Findley, P.A., Sambamoorthi, U. Employment and Disability: Evidence from the 1996 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey. J Occup Rehabil 14, 1–11 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOOR.0000015007.46881.84

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOOR.0000015007.46881.84

Navigation