Skip to main content
Log in

User Attitudes Regarding a User-Adaptive eCommerce Web Site

  • Published:
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite an abundance of recommendations by researchers and more recently by commercial enterprises for adaptive interaction techniques and technologies, there exists little experimental validation of the value of such approaches to users. We have conducted user studies focussed on the perceived value of a variety of personalization features for an eCommerce Web site for computing machinery sales and support. Our study results have implications for the design of user-adaptive applications. Interesting findings include unenthusiastic user attitudes toward system attempts to infer user needs, goals, or interests and to thereby provide user-specific adaptive content. Users also expressed equivocal opinions of collaborative filtering for the specific eCommerce scenarios we studied; thus personalization features popular in one eCommerce environment may not be effective or useful for other eCommerce domains. Users expressed their strong desire to have full and explicit control of data and interaction. Lastly, users want readily to be able to make sense of site behavior, that is, to understand a site’s rationale for displaying particular content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ardissono, L. and Goy, A.: 1999, Tailoring the interaction with users in electronic shops. In: Proceedings of the 7th International User Modeling Conference (UM’99), pp. 35–44.

  • Burke, R.: 1999, Integrati ng Knowledge-Based and Collaborative-Filtering. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1999 Workshop on AI and Electronic Commerce, pp. 14–20.

  • Brusilovsky, P.: 2001, Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, D. N.: 2001, Empirical evaluation of user models and user-adapted systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.: 2001, User modeling in human-computer interaction. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1975, Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, NY, Academic, pp. 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudlicka, E. and McNeese, M. D.: 2002, Assessment of User Affective and Belief States for Interface Adaptation: Application to an Air Force Pilot Task. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joerding, T.: 1999, Temporary user modeling for adaptive product presentation in the Web, In: Proceedings of the 7th International User Modeling Conference (UM’99), pp. 333–334.

  • Karat, J., Karat, C-M., Brodie, C., Alpert, S. R. and Vergo, J.: 2002, Personalizing Interaction: Customer and Business Value of Personalization Features in e-Commerce. Submitted.

  • Kobsa, A., Koenemann, J. and Pohl, W.: 2001, Personalized hypermedia presentation techniques for improving online customer relationships. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 16 (2),111–155.http://www.ics.uci.edu/∼kobsa/papers/2001-KER-kobsa.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, J., Noronha, S. and Vergo, J.: 2000, A User-Centered Design approach to personalization. Communications of the ACM, 43(8), 45–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milosavljevic, M. and Oberlander, J.: 1998, Dynamic Hypertext Catalogues: Helping Users to Help Themselves. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HT’98). Also at http://www.dynamicmultimedia.com.au/papers/ht98/.

  • Paris, C. L.: 1987, The use of explicit user models in text generation: Tailoring to a user’s level of expertise. PhD Thesis, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C. L.: 1993, User Modeling in Text Generation, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, B. and Nass, C.: 1999, TheMedia Equation:How People Treat Computers, Television, and NewMedia likeReal People and Places, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications/Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, P. and Varian, H. R.: 1997, Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 56–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, E.: 1979, Building and Exploiting User Models. PhD Thesis, Carnegie-Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. B., Konstan, J. and Riedl, J.: 2001, E-Commerce Recommendation Applications. Journal of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 5(1/2), 115–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R.: 1969, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman, D. and Brown, J. S.: 1982, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, London, Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syeda-Mahmood,T.:2001,Learning and Tracki g Browsing Behavior of Users using Hidden Markov Models. In: Proceedings of Make IT Easy 2001,The IBM Ease of Use Conference, http://eou2.austin.ibm.com/easy/eou_int.sf/EasyPrint/1859.

  • Vredenburg, K., Isensee, S. and Righi, C.: 2001, User Central design: An Integrated Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alpert, S.R., Karat, J., Karat, CM. et al. User Attitudes Regarding a User-Adaptive eCommerce Web Site. User Model User-Adap Inter 13, 373–396 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026201108015

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026201108015

Navigation