Skip to main content
Log in

Value, Business and Globalisation – Sketching a Critical Conceptual Framework

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Value is a basic concept in economics, ethics and sociology. Locke made labour the source of value, whereas Smith referred to an ideal exchange and Kant specified that commodities only have a market price, no intrinsic value. One can distinguish two modern concepts of value, an economic one trying to explain value in terms of utility, interest or preferences, and an ideal one considering values as ends in themselves. On this basis, Durkheim constructed his theory of value, which was developed by his followers Mauss and Bouglé and further by Bataille. Their line of thought makes it possible to develop a conceptual framework, which can be used to criticise neo-liberalism, big business and the effects of globalisation, while at the same time defending the moral value of business and giving an interpretation of the anti-globalisation protests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, Theodor W.: 1967, ‘Einleitung zu Emile Durkheim Soziologie und Philosophie’, in Adorno: Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 8 (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M., 1972), pp. 243–279.

  • Bataille, Georges: 1949, La part maudite in Bataille: Oeuvres complètes, t. VII (Gallimard, Paris, 1976), pp. 17–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataille, Georges: 1954, La Souveraineté in Bataille: Oeuvres complètes, t. VIII (Gallimard, Paris, 1976), pp. 243–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouglé, Celestin: 1922, Leçon de sociologie sur l'évolution des valeurs (Arman Collin, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile: 1887, ‘La science positive de la morale en Allemagne’, Revue philosophique 12, 33–58, 113–142, 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile: 1911, ‘Jugement de valeur et jugement de fait’, in Durkheim: Sociologie et philosophie (PUF, Paris, 21996), pp. 115–141.

  • Durkheim, Émile: 1893, De la division du travail social (Félix Alcan, Paris).

  • Gurvitch, Georges: 1963, La vocation actuelle de la sociologie, t. I-II (P.U.F., Paris), 21957–21963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel: 1785, Metaphysik der Sitten (Felix Meiner, Leipzig, 41945).

  • Locke, John: 1698, Two Treatises of Government (Cambridge University Press, 1988).

  • Luhmann, Niklas: 1977, ‘Arbeitsteilung und Moral. Durkheims Theorie’, in Durkheim: Ñber die Teilung der sozialen Arbeit (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.), pp. 17–35.

  • Mauss, Marcel: 1923–1924, ‘Essai sur le don: Forme et raison de l'échange dans les société archaïques’, in Mauss: Sociologie et anthropologie (P.U.F., Paris, 1999), pp. 145–279.

  • Montes, Pedro: 1999, El desorden neoliberal (Trotta, Madrid).

  • Moore, G. E.: 1922, ‘The Conception of Intrinsic Value’, in Moore: Principia ethica (Cambridge University Press, 21993), pp. 280–298.

  • Rohls, Jan: 1991, Geschichte der Ethik (J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A.: 1976, Economics McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, Max: 1926, Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die Materiale Wertethik (Francke, Bern, 61980).

  • Smith, Adam: 1776, The Wealth of Nations (Random House, New York, 1937).

  • Sørensen, Asger: 1994, ‘At tage fat om ondets rod. Batailles radikale civilisationskritik’, in R. Rasmussen and A. Sørensen (eds.), Excesser-om Georges Bataille (Modtryk, Århus), pp. 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, Asger: 1998, ‘Durkheims ansats til en etik for det moderne samfund-og en metodologisk kritik af den filosofiske etik’, in A. Greve (ed.), Sociologien om velfoerd-gensyn med Émile Durkheim (Roskilde Universitetsforlag, Frederiksberg), pp. 62–83.

  • Sørensen, Asger: 1999a, Sandheden er rød-og gid etikken var ligeså!, 2nd ed., Ph.D.-thesis (Københavns Universitet).

  • Sørensen, Asger: 1999b, ‘Praktisk filosofi i lyset af Georges Bataille-om lighed, etik og menneskelighed’, in C. B. Lausten and A. Berg-Sørensen (eds.), Den ene, den anden, det tredie.Politisk identitet, andethed og foellesskab i moderne fransk toenkning (Politisk Revy, København), pp. 189–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, Asger: 2001a, ‘Marcel Mauss. Kvinder, høfligheder og talismaner: Gaven som fuldstoendig social kendsgerning’, in M. H. Jacobsen et al. (eds.), Tradition og fornyelse i sociologien (Ålborg Universitetsforlag), pp. 71–92.

  • Sørensen, Asger: 2001b, ‘Georges Bataille: At tage ved loere af fascismen: Mellem modstand og analyse’, in M.H. Jacobsen et al. (eds.), Tradition og fornyelse i sociologien (Ålborg Universitetsforlag), pp. 241–260.

  • Weber: Max 1922, Wirtschaft und Gesellshaft (Mohr, Tübingen, 1990).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sørensen, A. Value, Business and Globalisation – Sketching a Critical Conceptual Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 39, 161–167 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016308807142

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016308807142

Navigation