Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating Comprehension-Based User Models: Predicting Individual User Planning and Action

  • Published:
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Described is a program of research that uses rigorous methods to evaluate models of user cognition and action based on the construction-integration architecture of comprehension (Doane and Sohn, 2000; Kintsch, 1988; 1998). The models interrelate user environmental information, background knowledge, and current goals, and then spread activation throughout the interrelated information to simulate UNIX user command productions, aviation pilot eye fixations and control movements during flight, and army personnel intelligence planning. Models of individuals in the complex interactive environments are tested for descriptive as well as predictive validity. Comparisons of model and human empirical data have resulted in a high degree of agreement, validating the ability of the comprehension-based architecture to support models that can predict user performance. Evaluation methods are detailed and the importance of evaluative rigor is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D. A.: 1989, Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Systems. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R.: 1993, Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. and Lebiere, C.: 1998, Atomic components of thought.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E.: 1993, Comparison with human experiments. In: D. E. Broadbent (ed.), The Ssimulation of Human Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 198–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M. and Gagnon, D. A.: 2000, The role of computational models in neuropsychological investigations of language: Reply to Ruml and Caramazza (2000). Psychological Review 107, 635–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, S. M., Mannes, S. M., Kintsch, W. and Polson, P. G.: 1992, Modeling User Command Production: A Comprehension-Based Approach. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction 2, 249–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, S. M., McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, W., Polson, P. G. and Clawson, D.: 1992, Prompt comprehension in UNIX command production. Memory and Cognition 20(4), 327–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, S. M., Pellegrino, J. W., and Klatzky, R. L.: 1990, Expertise in a computer operating system: Conceptualization and performance. Human–Computer Interaction 5, 267–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, S. M. and Sohn, Y.W.: 2000, ADAPT: A predictive cognitive model of user visual attention and action planning. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction 10, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, S. M., Sohn, Y. W., Adams, D. and McNamara, D. S.: 1994, Learning from instruction: A comprehension-based approach. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Atlanta, GA: Erlbaum, pp. 254–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, S. M., Sohn, Y. W. and Barnes, M. J.: 2000, Modeling the intuitive commander. ARL Technical Report. U.S. Army Research Laboratory. Ft. Huachuca, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, S. M., Sohn, Y. W., McNamara, D. S. and Adams, D.: 2000, Comprehension-based skill acquisition. Cognitive Science 24, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L.: 1992, What computer still can't do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L.: 1996, Response to my critics. Artificial Intelligence 80, 171–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durso, F. T. and Gronlund, S. D.: 1999, Situation awareness. In: F. T. Durso, R. Nickerson, R. Schvaneveldt, S. Dumais, S. Lindsay and M. Chi (eds.), The Handbook of Applied Cognition, New York: Wiley, pp. 283–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. J.: 1991, Symbolic connectionism: toward third-generation theories of expertise. In: K. A. Ericsson and J. Smith (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Expertise. Cambridge University Press, pp. 301–336.

  • Holyoak, K. J. and Thagard, P.: 1989, Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science 13, 295–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C. and Urbach, P.: 1993, Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach. La Salle, IL: Open Court Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurvich, C. M.: 1997, Mean square over degrees of freedom: New perspectives on a model selection treasure. In D. R. Brillinger, L. T. Fernholz and S. Morgenthaler (eds.), The practice of data analysis: Essays in honor of John W. Tukey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, C. A.: 1987, Computer Simulation: Separating Fact from Fiction. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W.: 1998, Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W.: 1988, The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review 95, 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W.: 1994, The psychology of discourse processing. In: M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 721–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, M. C. and Anderson, J. R.: 1996, History of success and current context in problem solving. Cognitive Psychology 31, 168–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannes, S. M. and Doane, S. M.: 1991, A hybrid model of script generation: Or getting the best of both worlds. Connection Science 3(1), 61–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannes, S. M. and Kintsch, W.: 1991, Routine computing tasks: Planning as understanding. Cognitive Science 15, 305–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D. W. (1988). Some criticisms of connectionist models of human performance. Journal of Memory and Language 27, 213–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E.: 1997, The problem is epistemology, not statistics: Replace significance tests by confidence intervals and quantify accuracy of risky numerical predictions. In: L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik and J. H. Steiger (eds.), What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 393–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. R. and Kintsch, W.: 1980, Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 335–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A.: 1990, Unified theories of cognition (The 1987 William James Lectures). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker, M. M. and Pirolli, P.: 1995, Modeling individual differences in students' learning strategies. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. and Pashler, H.: 2000, How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review 107, 358–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, P. S., Laird, J. E. and Newell, A.: 1991, Toward the knowledge level in SOAR: The role of architecture in the use of knowledge. In: K. VanLehn (ed.), Architectures for intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 75–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. and Kaplan, C. A.: 1991, Foundations of cognitive science. In: M. I. Posner (ed.), Foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, Y. W. and Doane, S. M.: 2001, The roles of expertise, working memory capacity, and long-term memory retrieval in complex cognitive performance. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Thagard, P.: 1989, Explanatory coherence. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 12, 435–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W.: 1983, Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K.: 1988, Student modeling. In: M. C. Polson and J. J. Richardson (eds.), Foundations of intelligent tutoring systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sohn, Y.W., Doane, S.M. Evaluating Comprehension-Based User Models: Predicting Individual User Planning and Action. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12, 171–205 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015072424236

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015072424236

Navigation