Abstract
This paper describes major trends in learner-adapted teaching systems towards greater learner control over the learning process. In the early teaching systems, the goal was to build a clever teacher able to communicate knowledge to the individual student. Recent and emerging work focuses on the learner exploring, designing, constructing, making sense and using adaptive systems as tools. Correspondingly, systems are being built to give the learner greater responsibility and control over all aspects of the learning, and especially over the learner model which is at the core of user-adaptation. A parallel trend is the growing acknowledgement of the importance of the learner's social context. Systems are increasingly being designed for learners working in groups of real or simulated peers. This paper discusses several elements of the shift to greater learner control, with a focus on the implications for learner modelling. The computer may offer the learner a choice of learning tools and companion learners, on-demand learning of various types, control over the elements of the systems and the possibility of controlling the amount of control. Learner control offers promising possibilities for improved learning. At the same time, there are pragmatic issues for achieving the benefits. The paper discusses three of these: the need to evaluate the effectiveness of the emergent learner-controlled systems; problems with learner control; and the need for interoperable and reusable components.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andriessen, J. and Sandberg, J.: 1999, Where is education heading and how about AI?, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 130-150.
Baker, M.: 1994, A model for negotiation in teaching-learning dialogues, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5, 2, 199-254.
Boud, D. and Feletti, G.: 1991, The challenge of problembased learning, Kogan Page, London.
Boyle, C. and Encarnacion, A.O.: 1994, MetaDoc: an adaptive hypertext reading system, User Models and User Adapted Interaction, 4(1), 1-20.
Browne, D., Totterdell, P. and Norman, M.: 1990, Adaptive User Interfaces, Academic Press, San Diego, California.
Bull, S. and Pain, H.: 1995a, Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me?: inspecting and questioning the Student Model, Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AACE, Washington DC, USA, pp. 501-508.
Bull, S., Brna, P. and Pain, H.: 1995b, Extending the scope of the student model, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5(1), 44-65.
Bull, S. and Brna, P.: 1997a, What does Susan know that Paul doesn't? (and vice-versa): contributing to each other's student model, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, IOS Press, pp. 568-570.
Bull, S.: 1997b, A multiple student and user modelling system for peer interaction, Proceedings of ABIS97, Universität Saarbrücken, pp. 61-71.
Burton, R.R. and Brown, J.S.: 1979, An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 11, 5-24.
Carbonaro, A., Maniezzo, V., Roccietti, M. and Aslomoni, P.: 1995, Modeling the student in Pitagora 2.0, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(4), 233-251.
Chan, T.W. and Baskin, A.B.: 1990, Learning Companion Systems, Intelligent Tutoring systems: at the crossroads of Artificial Intelligence and Education, Ablex.
Chan, T.W.: 1996, Learning companion systems, social learning systems, and the global social learning club, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7, 125-159.
Chin, D.: 2001, Empirical evaluation of user models and user-adapted systems, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(1–2), 181-194 (this issue).
Collins, J.A., Greer, J.E., Kumar, V.S. McCalla, G.I., Meagher, P. and Tkatch, R.: 1997, Inspectable user models for just-in-time workplace training, In: A. Jameson, C. Paris and C. Tasso (eds.), User Modeling Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference UM97, pp. 327-337, Springer, Chia Laguna, Sardinia, Italy.
Cook, R., Kay, J., Ryan, G. and Thomas, R.C.: 1995, A toolkit for appraising the long term usability of a text editor, Software Quality Journal, Chapman and Hall, London, 4, 131-154.
Corbett, A.T. and Anderson, J.: 1995, Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253-278.
Crawford, K. and Kay, J.: 1993, Metacognitive processes and learning with intelligent educational systems, In: P. Slezak, T. Caelli and R. Clark (eds.), Perspectives on Cognitive Science, Ablex, pp. 63-77.
Curtis, C.A., Carver, A., Howard, R.A. and Lane, W.D.: 1995, A methodology for active, student controlled learning: motivating our weakest students, In: Proceedings of the 27th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Eliot, C. and Woolf, B.P.: 1995, An adaptive student centred curriculum for an intelligent training system, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5(1), 67-86.
Fischer, G.: 2001, User modeling in Human-Computer Interaction, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(1–2), 65-86 (this issue).
Fischer, G.: 1991, The importance of models in making complex systems comprehensible, In: D. Ackerman and M. Tauber (eds.), Mental Models and Human Computer Communication: Proceedings of the 8th Interdisciplinary Workshop on Informatics and Psychology, Schaeding, Austria, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 3-36.
Goodman, B., Soller, A., Linton, F. and Gaimari, R.: 1998, Encouraging student reflection and articulation using a learning companion, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 237-255.
Grandbastien, M.: 1999, Teaching expertise is at the core of ITS research, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 335-349.
Haller, S. and McRoy, S. and Kobsa, A.: 1999, Computational Models of Mixed-Initiative Interaction. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Henderson, A. and Kyng, M: 1995, From customisable systems to intelligent agents, In: R.M. Baeker, J. Grudin, W. Buxton and S. Greenberg (eds), Readings in Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 783-792, Morgan Kaufmann.
Hietala, P. and Niemirepo, T.: 1998, The Competence of Learning Companion Agents, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 178-192.
Hohl, H., Böcker, H-D. and Gunzenhäuser, R.: 1996, Hypadapter: An Adaptive Hypertext System for Exploratory Learning and Programming, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6, 12-3.
Holden, S and Kay, J.: 1999 The scrutable user model and beyond, In: R. Morales (ed.), AIED, Artificial Intelligence and Education, 99 Workshop W7: Open, interactive, and other overt approaches to learner modelling, pp. 51-62, http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/groups/aied/Conferences/Ovalm/Papers
Hook, K., Karlgren, J. Waern, A., Dahlbeck, N., Jansson, C.G. and Lemaire, B.: 1996, A glass box approach to adaptive hypermedia, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6(2–3), 157-184.
Horvitz, E.: 1997, Agents with beliefs: reflections on bayesian methods for user modeling, User Modeling, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference UM97, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 441-442.
LTSC IEEE: 1999, IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee (LTSC), In: http//ltsc.ieee.org/ltsc/, IEEE.
Johnson, W.L., Rickel, J.W. and Lester, J.C.: 2000, Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 47-78.
Kay, J.: 1995, The um toolkit for cooperative user modelling, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(3), 149-196.
Kobsa, A. and Pohl, W.: 1995, The user modeling shell system BGP-MS, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(2), 59-106.
Koedinger, K.R., Suthers, D.D. and Forbus, K.D.: 1999, Component-based construction of a science learning space, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 292-313.
Lester, J.C., Stone, B.A. and Stelling, G.D.: 1999, Lifelike pedagogic agents in mixed-initiative problem solving in constructivist learning environments, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 9(1–2), 1-144.
Linton, F. Joy, D. and Schaefer, H-P.: 1999, Building user and expert models by long-term observation of application usage, In: J. Kay (ed.), User Modeling: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, UM99, Springer Wien, pp. 129-138.
Luckin, R. and du Boulay, B.: Capability, potential and collaborative assistance, In: J. Kay (ed.), User Modeling: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, UM99, Springer Wien, New York, pp. 139-148.
Machado, I., Martins, A. and Paiva, A.: 1999, One for all and all for one: a learner modelling server in a multi-agent platform, In: J. Kay (ed.), User Modeling: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, UM99, Springer Wien, New York.
Major, N.: 1995, Modelling teaching strategies, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(2/3), 117-152.
Moyse, R. and Elsom-Cook, M.: In: Knowledge Negotiation, Academic Press, London.
Muhlenbrock, M., Tewissen, F. and Hoppe, H.U.: A framework system for intelligent support in open distributed learning environments, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 256-274.
Paiva, A. and Self, J.: 1995, TAGUS–a user and learner modeling workbench, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(3), 197-228.
Reagle, J. and Cranor, L.: 1998, W3C The Platform for Privacy Preferences, In: http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-P3P-CACM/
Sack, W., Soloway, E. and Weingard, P.: 1994, Re-writing cartesian student models, In: J. Greer and G. McCalla (eds.), Student Modelling; The Key to Individualized Knowledge-Based Instruction, Springer-Verlag, pp. 335-376.
Self, J.: 2000, The defining characteristics of intelligent tutoring systems research: ITSs care, precisely, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 10, 350-364.
Self, J.: 1988, Bypassing the Intractable Problem of Student Modelling: Invited paper, In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Montreal, pp. 18-24
Shute, V.: 1995, Smart: Student Modeling Approach for Responsive Tutoring, UserModeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5(1), 1-44.
Vygotsky, L.S.: 1978, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, U.S.
Weber, G. and Mollenberg, A.: 1995, ELM programming environment: a tutoring system for LISP beginners, In:K. F. Wender and H.-D. Bocker (eds.), Ablex, Norwood, pp. 373-408.
Weber, G.: 1999, Adaptive learning systems in the World Wide Web, In: J. Kay (ed.), Proceedings of UM99: Seventh International Conference on User Modeling, pp. 371-378.
Wenger, E.: 1987, Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems–Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos.
White, B.Y., Shimoda, T.A. and Frederiksen, J.R.: 1999, Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: Computer support for metacognitive development, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 151-182.
Wilensky, R., Arens, Y. and Chin, D.: 1984, Talking to UNIX in English: an overview of UC, Communications of the ACM, 27(6), 574-593.
Zukerman, I. and Litman, D.: 2001, Natural language processing and user modeling: synergies and limitations, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(1–2), 129-158 (this issue).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kay, J. Learner Control. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11, 111–127 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011194803800
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011194803800