Abstract
Production duality in peanut cultivation is referred as conventional and organic method. A field survey was conducted in Gujarat state, India, to assess the cost and benefits of production duality in peanut; different organic formulations practised; and motivational factors and constraints in organic peanut cultivation. Thirty organic peanut growing and equal number of conventional farmers were selected through multistage sampling procedure, and face to face interview was conducted using pretested interview schedule. The results revealed that farmers were practising different organic formulations and their cost varied depending upon the inputs used. There were no significant differences in age, education and experience in farming between the organic and conventional farmers, but considerable differences were observed in the number of effective workers and livestock owned. It implies farm households with more family members and livestock are practising organic peanut cultivation. The total cost of cultivation in organic peanut was $699/ha, whereas it was $656/ha under conventional method. The total return in organic peanut was $1233/ha, whereas it was $1192/ha under conventional methods. The net returns realized by organic peanut growing farmers was $534/ha, whereas it was $536/ha by the conventional peanut farmers. There is no significant difference in the net return per hectare between organic and conventional methods, if organic and other inputs supplied from farmers own sources are imputed. However, if other sustainable benefits to the environment, ecology, landscape, consumers, etc. are included in valuation, the returns may outweigh in organic method. Besides traditional organic inputs like Farm Yard Manure (FYM) and compost, farmers used their own organic formulations like Panchamrut or Panchagavya, Jivamrut and Dharamrut and cost of these formulations ranged from $7.2/ha to $41.3/ha. The major factors that induced shift to organic peanut farming were soil improvement, awareness on hazards of conventional method and to reduce dependency on external inputs like chemical fertilizers and pesticides. The private institutions and individuals rather than the public institutions were the major motivational source for organic peanut cultivation, indicating the necessity of involvement of public institutions at different levels from farm to consumer for ordered growth of peanut cultivation. The initial decline in crop yield, high price of organic inputs supplied by the private companies and non-realization of premium price by farmers were the major constraints in organic peanut cultivation. These constraints have to be addressed by farmers themselves as well as by the government through appropriate policy intervention to upscale organic peanut cultivation in India.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
APEDA (2014) www.apeda.gov.in. Accessed on 06 June 2014
Bennett R, Carruthers SA, Tramer R (1999) The financial performance of organic vegetable growing: case studies from southern England. Farm Manag 10:307–317
Charyulu K, Dwivedi AK (2010) Economics of organic farming vis-à-vis conventional farming in India. Biling J Humanit Soc Sci 1:1–9
Froster D, Andres C, Verma R, Zundel C, Messmer MM, Maeder P (2013) Yield and economic performance of organic and conventional cotton based farming systems—results from a field trial in India. PLoS ONE 8(12), e81039. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081039
Garret HE, Woodworth RS (1969) Statistics and psychology and education. Vakils, Feffer and Symons, Bombay
Govindaraj G (2012) Constraints and strategies for development of small scale peanut processing units in Gujarat (India): a Garret ranking approach. Int J Agric Stat Sci 8:705–771
Grolink (2005) Organic agriculture development training material. Torfolk, Sweden, p 228
Kshirsagar KG (2007) Impact of organic farming on economics of sugarcane cultivation in Maharashtra. Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune
Kumawat RN, Mahajan SS, Mertia RS, Meena OP (2013) Green agriculture cultivation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) with foliar applied plant leaf extract and soil applied Panchagavya. Ind J Agric Sci 82:376–380
Lampkin NH (1994) Economics of organic farming in Britain. In: The economics of organic farming—an international perspective, CAB International Publishers
Mahale P (2002) National study: India. In: PRUDD: organic agriculture and rural poverty alleviation-potential and best practices in Asia, Population, Rural and Urban Development Divisions, UNESCAP, Bangkok
Maheswari TU, Haripriya K (2008) Response of hot pepper (Capsicum annum) cv.K2 to various sources of organic manures and foliar nutrients. Asian J Hortic 3:51–53
Medina F, Iglesis A (2008) Economic feasibility of organic farms and risk management strategies. In: 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists
Nieberg H, Schulze PL (1996) Profitability of farms converting to organic farming in Germany—empirical results of 107 farms. Farm Manag 9:218–227
Nileema SG, Sreenivasa MN (2011) Influence of liquid organic manures on growth, nutrient content and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum Mill.) in the sterilized soil. Karnataka J Agric Sci 24:153–157
Prasad R (2005) Organic farming vis-à-vis modern agriculture. Curr Sci 89:252–254
Ramesh P, Singh M, Subba Rao A (2005) Organic farming: its relevance to the Indian context. Curr Sci 88:561–568
Ramesh P, Panwar NR, Singh AB, Ramana S, Subba Rao A (2010) Status of organic farming in India. Curr Sci 98:1190–1194
Reddy PS (1988) Genetics, breeding and varieties. In: Reddy PS (ed) Groundnut. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi
Salvador VG, Jyoti K (2003) Market opportunities and challenges for India organic products. SECO study, India
Sheetal P, Pytrik Pratik Shah R, Seema P, Joost W (2014) Comparing conventional and organic agriculture in Karnataka, India: where and when can organic farming be sustainable. Land Use Policy 37:40–51
Shetty PK, Alvares C, Yadav AK (2014) Organic farming and sustainability, National Institute of Advanced Studies. Aditi Enterprises, Bangalore
Singh RP (2014) Status paper on oilseeds crops. Directorate on Oilseeds Development (DOD). Government of India. Ministry of Agriculture, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad
Smith EG, Clapperton MJ, Blackshaw RE (2004) Profitability and risk of organic production systems in the Northern Great Plains. Renew Agri Food Syst 19:152–158
Tzouramani I, Karanikolas P, Alexopoulos G (2008) Risk and income risk management issues for organic crops in Greece. In: 108th EAAE Seminar, February 8–9 2008, Warsaw, Poland
Worthington V (2001) Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, vegetables and grains. J Altern Complement Med 7:161–173
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Director, Directorate of Groundnut Research (DGR) for providing institute funds to carry out the above work and Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India, for the encouragement.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no real or perceived conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Govindaraj, G., Thorat, G. & Rathnakumar, L. Production duality, profitability, driving forces and constraints in organic peanut cultivation in India. Org. Agr. 6, 99–107 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0117-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0117-3