Skip to main content
Log in

The development and implementation of organic seed regulation in the USA

  • Published:
Organic Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reviews and analyses the evolution of organic seed regulation in the USA, as a model case of how challenges in a new regulatory area are being addressed. The study draws on formal interviews of key stakeholders, participant observation and documents generated in a 6-year period between 2007 and 2013. The article addresses three main issues: (1) how proposals for the wording and implementation of the regulation constrain seed choices and give rise to unintended consequences, (2) how emergent organizations and procedures have responded to the tension between sustaining seed differentiation to match the characteristics of local markets, organic production and agro-ecologies, and the narrowing of varietal choice in catalogued seed so as to expand commercial organic seed markets and encourage organic seed breeding and (3) why consensus on the content of formal seed policy has failed to develop despite a high level of stakeholder engagement. The study revealed that the official guidance on the interpretation of the regulation has not been sufficiently decisive to prevent divergent interpretation and practices, and therefore, the needs of a rapidly growing economic sector are not being met. The article concludes by drawing lessons for key areas of regulatory interpretation and practice and by identifying possible ways to make organic seed governance more effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACA:

Accredited Certifier Association

AMS:

Agricultural Marketing Service

AOSCA:

Association of Official Seed Certifying Agencies

ASTA:

American Seed Trade Association

ATTRA:

Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas

FFSC:

Family Farmers Seed Cooperative

IFOAM:

International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements

JC & CAC:

Joint Crops and Compliance, Accreditation and Certification Committee

NOP:

National Organic Program

NOSB:

National Organic Standards Board

NOVIC:

Northern Organic Vegetable Improvement Collaborative

OFPA:

Organic Foods Production Act

OFRF:

Organic Farming Research Foundation

OMRI:

Organic Materials Review Institute

OREI:

Organic Research and Education Initiative

OSA:

Organic Seed Alliance

OSP:

Organic Seed Partnership

OTA:

Organic Trade Association

PSI:

Public Seed Initiative

SARE:

Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education

SOS:

State of Organic Seed

USDA:

United States Department of Agriculture

References

  • Accredited Certifiers Association (ACA) (2008) Further guidance on commercial availability of organic seed, September, 22, 2008. Available from URL: http://www.accreditedcertifiers.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Further-Guidance-on-Commercial-Availability-of-Seed_11.2008.pdf/

  • Adam K (2005) Seed production and variety development for organic systems. Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas (ATTRA). Available from URL: https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/organic_seed/

  • Colley M, Baker B (2010) Sourcing certified organic seed and the national organic program regulations. Available from URL: http://www.extension.org/article/18338/print/

  • DeLeon P, DeLeon L (2002) What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach. J Public Adm Res Theory 12(4):467–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin N, Lincoln Y (1994) Handbook of quantitative research. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon M, Hubbard K. (2011) Organic Seed Alliance: State of organic seed report. Available from URL: http://seedalliance.org/uploads/publications/SOS_2011_Report.pdf/

  • Döring TF, Bocci R, Hitchings R et al. (2012) The organic seed regulations framework in Europe—current status and recommendations for future development. Organic Agriculture doi:10.1007/s13165-012-0034-7

  • Hal PA, Taylor RCR (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies XLIV, pp. 936–957

  • Howard PH (2009) Visualizing consolidation in the global seed industry: 1996–2008. Sustainability 1(4):1266–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard K (2012) AOSCA announces new organic seed database. Available from URL: http://blog.seedalliance.org/2012/09/26/new-organic-seed-database-announced/

  • IFOAM (International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements) (2012). The IFOAM norms for organic production and processing, version 2012. Available at URL: www.ifoam.org/

  • Jiggins J, Collins K (2003) Stakeholders and stake holding in social learning for integrated catchments management and sustainable use of water. In: Social Learning for the Integrated Management (SLIM) Thematic Paper, pp 28

  • Kickert WJM, Klijn HE, Koppenjan JFM (1997) Introduction: a management perspective on policy networks. In: Kickert WJM, Klijn HE, Koppenjan JFM (eds) Managing complex networks: strategies for the public sector. Sage Publications Ltd., London, pp 2–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein K, Winickoff DE (2011) Organic regulation across the Atlantic: emergence, divergence, convergence. Environ Polit 20(2):153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff K (2004) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale S (1996) Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammerts van Bueren ET, Struik PC, Jacobsen E (2002) Ecological concepts in organic farming and their consequences for an organic crop ideotype. Neth J Agric Sci 50:1–26

  • Luttikholt LWM (2007) Principles of organic agriculture as formulated by the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). Neth J Agric Sci 54(4):346–360

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall NA (2005) The certified organic seed market: implications of delayed development. A report prepared for the California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops (CISSC). Available from URL: http://www.cissc.calpoly.edu/research/49942FinalReport.pdf/

  • May C, Finch T (2009) Implementing, embedding and integrating: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology 43(3):535–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuleman L (2008) Public management and the metagovernance of hierarchies, networks and markets. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • NOP (National Organic Program) (2011) Draft guidance seeds, annual seedlings, and planting stock in organic crop production. NOP 5029, June 13, 2011. Available from URL: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5091383/

  • NOP (National Organic Program) (2013) Draft guidance seeds, annual seedlings, and planting stock in organic crop production. NOP 5029, March 4, 2013. Available from URL: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5102731

  • NOSB (National Organic Standards Board) (2001) Commercial availability, March 21, 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5060373/

  • NOSB (National Organic Standards Board) (2005) Recommendations on commercial availability of organic seed, August 17, 2005. Available from URL: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELDEV3104462/

  • NOSB (National Organic Standards Board) (2008c) Commercial availability of organic seed, November 19, 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5074861/

  • NOSB (National Organic Standards Board) Joint Crops and CAC Committee (2007) Recommendations on further guidance on the establishment of commercial availability criteria, November 30, 2007. Available from URL: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5066630&acct=nosb/

  • NOSB (National Organic Standards Board) Joint Crops and CAC Committee (2008a) Further guidance on commercial availability of organic seed, April 3, 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5068445&acct=nosb/

  • NOSB (National Organic Standards Board) Joint Crops and CAC Committee (2008b) Further guidance on commercial availability of organic seed, September 22, 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5072618&acct=nosb/

  • OFPA (Organic Food and Production Act) (1990), Title XXI of the 1990 Farm Bill of Public Law 101–624, The Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990. Available from URL: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5060370/

  • OTA (Organic Trade Association) (2011) OTA task force draft comments: National Organic Program: Notice of draft guidance NOP 5029: seeds, annual seedlings, and planting stock in organic crop production. AMS-NOP-11-0002: NOP-11-02. August 12, 2011. Available from URL: http://www.ota.com/pp/otaposition/Seeds-Annual-Seedlings-and-Planting-Stock.html

  • OTA (Organic Trade Association) (2012) OTA’s 2012 Organic industry survey. Brattleboro, VT. Available from URL: https://www.ota.com/bookstore/14.html/

  • Patton MQ (1980) Data analysis: qualitative evaluation methods part III. Sage Publications, Ltd., London, pp 267–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters GB, Pierre J (1998) Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. J Public Adm Res Theory 8(2):223–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podoll TM (2009) Participatory plant breeding’s contribution to resilience and the triple bottom line of sustainability—healthy ecosystem, vital economy, and social inclusion. Master of Science Thesis, Iowa State University

  • Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N et al (2009) Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis for natural resource management. J Environ Manag 90(5):1933–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reganold JP, Jackson-Smith D, Batie SS et al (2011) Transforming U.S. agriculture. Science 332:670–671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renaud ENC, Lammerts van Bueren ET, Jiggins J (2014) Comparative analysis of the organic seed regulations in the United States, European Union and Mexico. Submitted to International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

  • Rhodes RAW, (1996) The new governance: governing without governance. Political Studies XLIV: 652–667

  • Steimo S (2008) What is historical institutionalism? In: Porta DD, Keating M (eds) Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 118–138

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stolze M, Lampkin N (2009) Policy for organic farming: rationale and concepts. Food Policy 34:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) (2002) 7 CFR Part 205 National Organic Program Standards. Available from URL: www.ams.usda.gov/nop/standards/

  • Waterman RW, Meier KJ (1998) Principal-agent models: an expansion? J Public Adm Res Theory 8(2):173–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willer H, Kilcher L (eds) (2012) The world of organic agriculture—statistics and emerging trends 2011. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland and International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn, Germany

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erica N. C. Renaud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Renaud, E.N.C., Lammerts van Bueren, E.T. & Jiggins, J. The development and implementation of organic seed regulation in the USA. Org. Agr. 4, 25–42 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-014-0063-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-014-0063-5

Keywords

Navigation