Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariate discriminant analysis for assessing residential development projects from a contractor’s perspective

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

The Korean construction market is constantly observing residential development projects performed together by developers and contractors. Although the development cost of the overall project is high, there are no standard methods to help contractors make decisions as to whether to participate in these residential development projects or not. This study proposes a simple and efficient model to assist contractors to determine successful projects with a more standardized and objective decision process. To achieve this goal, 31 project assessment items were selected and their weights were updated by AHP method with more sample sizes. Several independent samples t-tests were also carried out to identify the significant factors that affect the contractor’s decision for residential development projects. Using multivariate discriminant analysis (MDA), a prediction model was developed with 109 residential development projects. The results indicated that 82% of the original grouped cases had been classified correctly. Cross validation showed that 81.5% of cross-validated grouped cases had been classified correctly. The simple and efficient model suggested in this study will help contractors make better decisions regarding whether to participate in the residential development projects or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chuah, J. W., Raghunathan, A., and Jha, N. K. (2013). “ROBESim: A retrofit-oriented building energy simulator based on EnergyPlus.” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 66, pp. 88–103, DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa, C. E. and Capeluto, I. G. (2015). “Decision methodology for the development of an expert system applied in an adaptable energy retrofit façade system for residential buildings.” Renewable Energy, Vol. 78, pp. 498–508, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capeluto, I. G. and Ochoa, C. E. (2014). “Simulation-based method to determine climatic energy strategies of an adaptable building retrofit façade system.” Energy, Vol. 76, pp. 375–384, DOI: 10.1016/j.energy. 2014.08.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halawa, W. S., Abdelalim, A. M., and Elrashed, I. A. (2013). “Financial evaluation program for construction projects at the pre-investment phase in developing countries: A case study.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 912–923, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y. G. (2007). A study on the feasibility analysis factor model for housing development projects. MSc Thesis, Chung ang University, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huh, Y. K., Hwang, B. G., and Lee, J. S. (2012). “Feasibility analysis model for developer-proposed housing projects in the republic of Korea.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 345–355, DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2012.698911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, G. T. (2005). Leading leaders analytical decision making hierarchy, Dong hyun publisher. Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju, J. Y. (2002). Study of the feasibility analysis in urban redevelopment Project, MSc Thesis, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, M. S. (1997). A Study on feasibility analysis in architectural planning phase, PhD Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. H. (2005). A study on the method of the risk management in the real estate development project, Construction Economy Research Institute of Korea, Report 114, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, S. M. and Jeong, M. U. (2007). “A basic study on the current state and problems of feasibility study focused on the evaluation criteria of the existing relative researches.” Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol. 23, No. 9, pp. 79–88, ISSN:1226-9093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, O. H. and Jeong, J. H. (2004). An analysis of construction firms feasibility study, Report104, Construction Economy Research Institute of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. C., Runeson, G., Ng, S. T., Hu, T. S., Cheung, S. O., and Deng, Z. M. (2001). “Capital budget planning practices of building contractors in Hong Kong.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 569–576, DOI: 10.1080/01446190110054112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N., and Deshmukh, S. G. (2002). “A multi-criteria group decision-making model for supplier rating.” Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 22–33, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00140.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisello, A. L. and Asdrubali, F. (2014). “Human-based energy retrofits in residential buildings: A cost-effective alternative to traditional physical strategies.” Applied Energy, Vol. 133, pp. 224–235, DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sin, U. S. (2005). Modeling for the feasibility study of apartment projects, PhD Thesis, Ho seo University, Asan, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Ki Huh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, KS., Kim, SY., Kim, D.Y. et al. Multivariate discriminant analysis for assessing residential development projects from a contractor’s perspective. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 1069–1075 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0783-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0783-z

Keywords

Navigation