Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in Japanese healthy donors: a prospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A “biosimilar” is a biotechnological product with a lower cost profile and equivalent efficacy and safety to the originator, but post-marketing clinical evaluation of biosimilar products has not been adequately conducted. We prospectively investigated the utility of biosimilar filgrastim in 13 peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) donors from June 2014 to January 2017. In addition, we retrospectively compared these to another 13 PBSC donors mobilized with the originator filgrastim in the same period. Donor characteristics were equivalent between the groups. The median number of CD34+ cells per donor body weight (BW) and blood volume processed (BV) were 4.87 × 106/kg and 25.5 × 103/mL in the biosimilar group and 4.93 × 106/kg and 16.6 × 103/mL in the originator group, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in the number of CD34+ cells per donor BW or BV. All adverse events associated with G-CSF were permissive. The total G-CSF cost was significantly lower in the biosimilar group than in the originator group. These findings suggest that biosimilar filgrastim has the same efficacy and short-term safety as originator filgrastim for PBSC mobilization in healthy donors, with economic superiority. Longer follow-up studies are needed to evaluate the incidence of long-term adverse events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duong HK, Savani BN, Copelan E, Devine S, Wingard JR, Shaughnessy P, et al. Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization for autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: guidelines from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20(9):1262–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harada K, Yamada Y, Konishi T, Nagata A, Takezaki T, Kaito S, et al. Comparison of transplant outcomes and economic costs between biosimilar and originator filgrastim in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol. 2016;104(6):709–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-016-2085-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Declerck P, Danesi R, Petersel D, Jacobs I. The language of biosimilars: clarification, definitions, and regulatory aspects. Drugs. 2017;77(6):671–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-017-0717-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan JC, Chan AT. Biologics and biosimilars: what, why and how? ESMO Open. 2017;2(1). Accessed 29 Nov 2018.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sato H, Shiobara S, Yasue S, Nakao S, Matsuda T. Large-volume leukapheresis for peripheral blood stem cell collection: efficiency and safety in patients and stem cell donors. Jpn J Transfus Med. 1999;45(1):32–7. https://doi.org/10.3925/jjtc1958.44.41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’’ for medical statistics’. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48(3):452–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Antelo ML, Zabalza A, Sánchez Antón MP, Zalba S, Aznar M, Mansilla C, et al. Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells from allogeneic healthy donors using a new biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio®). J Clin Aphere. 2016;31(1):48–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.21401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farhan R, Urbanowska E, Zborowska H, Król M, Torosian T, Piotrowska I, et al. Biosimilar G-CSF versus filgrastim and lenograstim in healthy unrelated volunteer hematopoietic stem cell donors. Ann Hematol. 2017;96(10):1735–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-017-3060-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderlini P. Effects and safety of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in healthy volunteers. Curr Opin Hematol. 2009;16(1):35–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0b013e328319913c.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonig H, Becker PS, Schwebig A, Turner M. Biosimilar granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for healthy donor stem cell mobilization: need we be afraid? Transfusion (Paris). 2015;55(2):430–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.12770.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaw BE, Confer DL, Hwang WY, Pamphilon DH, Pulsipher MA. Concerns about the use of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the mobilization of stem cells in normal donors: position of the World Marrow Donor Association. Haematologica. 2011;96(7):942–7. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2011.045740.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen SH, Yang SH, Chu SC, Su YC, Chang CY, Chiu YW, et al. The role of donor characteristics and post-granulocyte colony-stimulating factor white blood cell counts in predicting the adverse events and yields of stem cell mobilization. Int J Hematol. 2011;93:652–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-011-0844-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen SH, Wang TF, Yang KL. Hematopoietic stem cell donation. Int J Hematol. 2013;97:446–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-013-1298-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hölig K. G-CSF in healthy allogeneic stem cell donors. Transfus Med Hemother. 2013;40(4):225–35. https://doi.org/10.1159/000354196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the inpatient nursing team and the support staff for the excellent care they provided to our donors, patients and their families.

Funding

Funding was provided by Kyowa Hakko Kirin and Fuji Pharma.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Ishiyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

SN received research grants from Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. and Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sato, K., Ishiyama, K., Aoki, G. et al. Evaluation of a biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in Japanese healthy donors: a prospective study. Int J Hematol 110, 648–653 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-019-02733-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-019-02733-8

Keywords

Navigation