Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Red blood cell distribution width is a simple and novel biomarker for survival in light-chain amyloidosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has been used for the differential diagnosis of anemia, but high RDW may also be associated with several human disorders. We evaluated the prognostic relevance of RDW in patients with light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. We retrospectively analyzed all patients with AL amyloidosis who were newly diagnosed at the Japanese Red Cross Medical Center between December 2011 and June 2018. RDW was evaluated in 94 patients; 48% (n = 45) of patients had a high RDW (≥ 13.8%) and 52% (n = 49) had a low RDW (< 13.8%). Overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in patients with a high RDW (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, increased RDW was an independent predictor for OS. Even in patients without cardiac amyloidosis, the OS was significantly lower in the high-RDW group (P = 0.0064). The survival rate of high-RDW patients without cardiac involvement was as poor as that of patients with cardiac involvement. In addition, in patients with revised Mayo stage I or a normal level of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, high RDW was negatively correlated with OS (P = 0.0086, 0.025). RDW is a simple and strong predictor of early death, and is a prognostic biomarker in patients with AL amyloidosis without cardiac involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN. Systemic amyloidosis. Lancet. 2016;387:2641–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Merlini G, Stone MJ, Beard CM, Linke RP, Gertz MA, O’Fallon WM, et al. Dangerous small B-cell clones. Blood. 2006;108:2520–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palladini G, Barassi A, Klersy C, Pacciolla R, Milani P, Sarais G, et al. The combination of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) at presentation and changes in N-terminal natriuretic peptide type B (NT-proBNP) after chemotherapy best predicts survival in AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2010;116:3426–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kastritis E, Gavriatopoulou M, Dimopoulos MA, Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou E, Kanellias N, Roussou M, et al. Osteoprotegerin is a significant prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with primary systemic amyloidosis independent of the Mayo staging. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kastritis E, Papassotiriou I, Terpos E, Roussou M, Gavriatopoulou M, Komitopoulou A, et al. Clinical and prognostic significance of serum levels of von Willebrand factor and ADAMTS-13 antigens in AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2016;128:405–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, Saenger A, Kumar SK, Lacy MQ, Buadi FK, et al. Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), but not galactin-3, adds to prognostication in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis independent of NT-proBNP and troponin T. Am J Hematol. 2015;90:524–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sachchithanantham S, Berlanga O, Alvi A, Mahmood SA, Lachmann HJ, Gillmore JD, et al. Immunoparesis defined by heavy + light chain suppression is a novel marker of long-term outcomes in cardiac AL amyloidosis. Br J Haematol. 2017;179:575–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kastritis E, Papassotiriou I, Merlini G, Milani P, Terpos E, Basset M, et al. Growth differentiation factor-15 is a new biomarker for survival and renal outcomes in light chain amyloidosis. Blood. 2018;131:1568–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abelson S, Collord G, Ng SWK, Weissbrod O, Mendelson Cohen N, Niemeyer E, et al. Prediction of acute myeloid leukaemia risk in healthy individuals. Nature. 2018;559:400–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaiswal S, Fontanillas P, Flannick J, Manning A, Grauman PV, Mar BG, et al. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2488–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Salvagno GL, Sanchis-Gomar F, Picanza A, Lippi G. Red blood cell distribution width: a simple parameter with multiple clinical applications. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2015;52:86–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu Z, Sun Y, Wang Q, Han Z, Huang Y, Liu X, et al. Red blood cell distribution width is a potential prognostic index for liver disease. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51:1403–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel KV, Ferrucci L, Ershler WB, Longo DL, Guralnik JM. Red blood cell distribution width and the risk of death in middle-aged and older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:515.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu L, Li M, Ding Y, Pu L, Liu J, Xie J, et al. Prognostic value of RDW in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:16027–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ai L, Mu S, Hu Y. Prognostic role of RDW in hematological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Cell Int. 2018;18:61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Blade J, Merlini G, Mateos M-V, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e538–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Falk RH. Diagnosis and management of the cardiac amyloidoses. Circulation. 2005;112:2047–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Greipp PR, Witzig TE, Lust JA, Lacy MQ, et al. A trial of three regimens for primary amyloidosis: colchicine alone, melphalan and prednisone, and melphalan, prednisone, and colchicine. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1202–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Milani P, Basset M, Russo F, Foli A, Merlini G, Palladini G. Patients with light-chain amyloidosis and low free light-chain burden have distinct clinical features and outcome. Blood. 2017;130:625–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dittrich T, Bochtler T, Kimmich C, Becker N, Jauch A, Goldschmidt H, et al. AL amyloidosis patients with low amyloidogenic free light chain levels at first diagnosis have an excellent prognosis. Blood. 2017;130:632–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Colby C, et al. Revised prognostic staging system for light chain amyloidosis incorporating cardiac biomarkers and serum free light chain measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:989–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Maisel AS, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM, McCord J, Hollander JE, Duc P, et al. Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:161–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ong SY, Ng HJ. Howell-Jolly bodies in systemic amyloidosis. Int J Hematol. 2018;108:119–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee H, Kong S-Y, Sohn JY, Shim H, Youn HS, Lee S, et al. Elevated red blood cell distribution width as a simple prognostic factor in patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:145619.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang J, Xie X, Cheng F, Zhou X, Xia J, Qian X, et al. Evaluation of pretreatment red cell distribution width in patients with multiple myeloma. Cancer Biomark. 2017;20:267–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meng S, Ma Z, Lu C, Liu H, Tu H, Zhang W, et al. Prognostic value of elevated red blood cell distribution width in chinese patients with multiple myeloma. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2017;47:282–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Periša V, Zibar L, Sinčić-Petričević J, Knezović A, Periša I, Barbić J. Red blood cell distribution width as a simple negative prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study. Croat Med J. 2015;56:334–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Luo H, Quan X, Song X-Y, Zhang L, Yin Y, He Q, et al. Red blood cell distribution width as a predictor of survival in nasal-type, extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:92522–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Iriyama N, Hatta Y, Kobayashi S, Uchino Y, Miura K, Kurita D, et al. Higher red blood cell distribution width is an adverse prognostic factor in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:5473–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Podhorecka M, Halicka D, Szymczyk A, Macheta A, Chocholska S, Hus M, et al. Assessment of red blood cell distribution width as a prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Oncotarget. 2016;7:32846–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Rhodes CJ, Howard LS, Busbridge M, Ashby D, Kondili E, Gibbs JSR, et al. Iron deficiency and raised hepcidin in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:300–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. de Gonzalo-Calvo D, de Luxán-Delgado B, Rodríguez-González S, García-Macia M, Suárez FM, Solano JJ, et al. Interleukin 6, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor I and red blood cell distribution width as biological markers of functional dependence in an elderly population: a translational approach. Cytokine. 2012;58:193–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang R, Du L, Yang X, Jiang X, Duan W, Yan S, et al. Identification of long noncoding RNAs as potential novel diagnosis and prognosis biomarkers in colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142:2291–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tetè S, Nicoletti M, Saggini A, Maccauro G, Rosati M, Conti F, et al. Nutrition and cancer prevention. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2012;25:573–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Obici L, Perfetti V, Palladini G, Moratti R, Merlini G. Clinical aspects of systemic amyloid diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteomics. 2005;1753:11–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Danese E, Lippi G, Montagnana M. Red blood cell distribution width and cardiovascular diseases. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:E402–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Hu Y, Liu H, Fu S, Wan J, Li X. Red blood cell distribution width is an independent predictor of AKI and mortality in patients in the coronary care unit. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2017;42:1193–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Deswal A, Petersen NJ, Feldman AM, Young JB, White BG, Mann DL. Cytokines and cytokine receptors in advanced heart failure: an analysis of the cytokine database from the vesnarinone trial (VEST). Circulation. 2001;103:2055–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chiari MM, Bagnoli R, De Luca PD, Monti M, Rampoldi E, Cunietti E. Influence of acute inflammation on iron and nutritional status indexes in older inpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:767–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pierce CN, Larson DF. Inflammatory cytokine inhibition of erythropoiesis in patients implanted with a mechanical circulatory assist device. Perfusion. 2005;20:83–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nishiyama Y, Niiyama H, Harada H, Katou A, Yoshida N, Ikeda H. Effect of exercise training on red blood cell distribution width as a marker of impaired exercise tolerance in patients with coronary artery disease. Int Heart J. 2016;57:553–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

TY and KO designed the study. TY, KO, JN, YU, KS, KM, MO, YY, YA, NT, TI and KS recruited patients and collected samples. TY and KO analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the data and critically commented on the manuscript. This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takao Yogo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

K. Suzuki received personal fees from Janssen, Novartis, Celgene, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Fujimoto Pharmaceuticals and SRL. T. Ishida received personal fees from Janssen, Celgene, Ono Pharmaceuticals and Takeda. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yogo, T., Okazuka, K., Nashimoto, J. et al. Red blood cell distribution width is a simple and novel biomarker for survival in light-chain amyloidosis. Int J Hematol 110, 431–437 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-019-02692-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-019-02692-0

Keywords

Navigation