Abstract
Supply chain coordination problems are frequently found at the manufacturing–marketing interface. Inspired by a case study from the food industry, we designed and validated a management game that focuses on potential conflicts between sales order acceptance and manufacturing utilization. We discuss how individual behavior under distributed decision making can be improved to comply with overall company objectives if system awareness is increased, incentive systems are carefully aligned, and cross-functional communication protocols are improved. An empirical investigation in a controlled laboratory experiment with university students shows the game’s effectiveness to achieve the key learning objectives. The results show that both an aligned bonus scheme and information and communication increase overall performance and decrease frictions between the two functional areas. As a further result from the experiment, we find that an improved bonus scheme has a larger impact than improved communication and information.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bendoly E, Donohue K, Schultz K (2006) Behavior in operations management: assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J Oper Manag 24(6):747–752
Cachon GP (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. In: de Kok AG, Graves SC (eds) Supply chain management: design, coordination and operations, handbooks in OR & MS, vol 11. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 229–339
Chayet S, Hopp WJ, Xu X (2004) The marketing-operations interface. In: Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen Z-J (eds) Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis: modeling in the e-business era. Kluwer, Norwell, Massachusetts, pp 485–554
Croson R (2002) Why and how to experiment: methodologies from experimental economics. Univ Illinois Law Rev 2002(4):921–945
Elgood C (1990) Using management games. Gower, Aldershot
Eliashberg J, Steinberg R (1993) Marketing-production joint decision making. In: Eliashberg J, Lilien G (eds) Handbooks in operations research and management science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 625–880
Ellinger AE, Daugherty P, Keller SB (2000) The relationship between marketing/logistics interdepartmental integration and performance in US. Manufacturing firms: an empirical study. J Bus Logist 21(1):1–22
Ellinger AE, Keller SB, Hansen JD (2006) Bridging the divide between logistics and marketing: facilitating collaborative behavior. J Bus Logist 27(2):1–27
Fleischmann B (1990) The discrete lotsizing and scheduling problem (DLSP). Eur J Oper Res 44(3):337–348
Gunasekaran A, Ngai EWT (2009) Modelling and analysis of built-to-order supply chains. Eur J Oper Res 195(2):319–334
Keskinocak P, Tayur S (2004) Due date management policies. In: Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen Z-J (eds) Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis: modeling in the E-business era. Kluwer, Norwell, Massachusetts, pp 295–334
Knolmayer G, Montandon C, Schmidt R (2004) Interaktive Lernobjekte zur Logistik. Wirtschaftsinformatik 46(2):139–151
Kouvelis P, Lariviere MA (2000) Decentralizing cross-functional decisions: coordination through internal markets. Manage Sci 46(8):1049–1058
Malhotra MK, Sharma S (2002) Spanning the continuum between marketing and operations. J Operat Manag 20(3):209–219
Mentzer J, Stank T, Esper T (2008) Supply chain management and its relationship to logistics, marketing, production, and operations management. J Bus Logist 29(1):31–46
Pinedo M (2002) Scheduling. Theory, algorithms, and systems, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Porteus EL, Whang S (1991) On manufacturing/marketing incentives. Manage Sci 37(9):1166–1181
Shapiro BP (1977) Can marketing and manufacturing coexist? Harvard Bus Rev 55(5):104–114
Talluri KT, van Ryzin GJ (2005) The theory and practice of revenue management. Springer, Berlin
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions to improve the manuscript and Mirko Kremer, The Pennsylvania State University, for his input to this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zöbeley, B., Minner, S. & Kilger, C. Incentive alignment at the manufacturing–marketing interface: Design and validation of a management game. Logist. Res. 3, 89–100 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-011-0048-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-011-0048-7