Abstract
We present a cross-cultural analysis showing that the presence of an active or moral High God in societies varies generally along a continuum from lesser to greater technological complexity and subsistence productivity. Foragers are least likely to have High Gods. Horticulturalists and agriculturalists are more likely. Pastoralists are most likely, though they are less easily positioned along the productivity continuum. We suggest that belief in moral High Gods was fostered by emerging leaders in societies dependent on resources that were difficult to manage and defend without group cooperation. These leaders used the concept of a supernatural moral enforcer to manipulate others into cooperating, which resulted in greater productivity. Reproductive success would accrue most to such leaders, but the average reproductive success of all individuals in the society would also increase with greater productivity. Supernatural enforcement of moral codes maintained social cohesion and allowed for further population growth, giving one society an advantage in competition with others.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, Q. D., & Bourrat, P. (2011). Beliefs about God, the afterlife and morality support the role of supernatural policing in human cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 41–49.
Bentley, G. R., Goldberg, T., & Jasienska, G. (1993). The fertility of agricultural and nonagricultural traditional societies. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 47, 269–281.
Boone, J. L. (1992). Competition, conflict, and the development of social hierarchies. In E. A. Smith & B. Winterhalder (Eds.), Evolutionary ecology and human behavior (pp. 301–337). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Bowles, S., Hertz, T., Bell, A., Beise, J., Clark, G., et al. (2009). Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies. Science, 326, 682–688.
Childe, V. G. (1950). The urban revolution. The Town Planning Review, 21, 3–17.
Divale, W. (2007). Pre-coded variables for the standard cross-cultural sample. World Cultures (1–15). New York: York College, CUNY.
Dyson-Hudson, R., & Dyson-Hudson, N. (1980). Nomadic pastoralism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 15–61.
Fuller, J. E., & Grandjean, B. D. (2001). Economy and religion in the Neolithic revolution: material surplus and the proto-religious ethic. Cross-Cultural Research, 35, 370–399.
Hastings, B. M., & Shaffer, B. (2008). Authoritarianism: the role of threat, evolutionary psychology, and the will to power. Theory & Psychology, 18, 423–440.
Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., et al. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 32, 1480–1484.
Irons, W. (2001). Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In R. Nesse (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 292–309). New York: Russell Sage.
Johnson, D. D. P. (2005). God’s punishment and public goods. Human Nature, 16, 410–446.
Johnson, A. W., & Earle, T. (2000). The evolution of human societies: from foraging group to agrarian state (2nd ed.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Marlowe, F. W. (2011). The behavioral ecology of warfare. Keynote presented at the fortieth annual meeting of the Society for Cross-Cultural Research, February, Charleston, SC.
Marlowe, F. W., Berbesque, J. C., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., et al. (2008). More ‘altruistic’ punishment in larger societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 587–590.
Moor, N., Ultee, W., & Need, A. (2009). Analogical reasoning and the content of creation stories: quantitative comparisons of preindustrial societies. Cross-Cultural Research, 43, 91–122.
Murdock, G. P. (1957). World ethnographic sample. American Anthropologist, 59, 664–687.
Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic atlas: a summary. Ethnology, 6, 109–236.
Murdock, G. P. (1981). Atlas of world cultures. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Murdock, G. P., & Morrow, D. O. (1970). Subsistence economy and supportive practices: cross-cultural codes—1. Ethnology, 9(3), 302.
Murdock, G. P., & Provost, C. (1973). Measurement of cultural complexity. Ethnology, 12, 379–392.
Murdock, G. P., & White, D. R. (1969). Standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology, 8, 329–369.
Murdock, G. P., & White, D. R. (1980). Standard cross-cultural sample. In H. Barry & A. Schlegel (Eds.), Cross-cultural samples and codes (pp. 3–43). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58–62.
Paige, K. E., & Paige, J. M. (1981). The politics of reproductive ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Peregrine, P. (1996). The birth of the gods revisited: a partial replication of Guy Swanson’s (1960) cross-cultural study of religion. Cross-Cultural Research, 30, 84–112.
Porter, C. C., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). How marginal are forager habitats? Journal of Archaeological Science, 34, 59–68.
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rodrigue, C. M. (1992). Can religion account for early animal domestications? A critical assessment of the cultural geographic argument, based on Near Eastern archaeological data. The Professional Geographer, 44, 417–430.
Roes, F. L. (1995). The size of societies, stratification, and belief in high gods supportive of human morality. Politics and the Life Sciences, 14, 73–77.
Roes, F. L., & Raymond, M. (2003). Belief in moralizing gods. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 126–135.
Sanderson, S. K., & Roberts, W. W. (2008). The evolutionary forms of the religious life: a cross-cultural, quantitative analysis. American Anthropologist, 110, 454–466.
Simpson, J. H. (1984). High gods and the means of subsistence. Sociological Analysis, 45, 213–222.
Snarey, J. (1996). The natural environment’s impact upon religious ethics: a cross-cultural study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35, 85–96.
Sosis, R. (2000). Religion and intragroup cooperation: preliminary results of a comparative analysis of utopian communities. Cross-Cultural Research, 34, 70–87.
Stark, R. (2001). Gods, rituals, and the moral order. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 619–636.
Swanson, G. E. (1960). The birth of the gods: the origin of primitive belief. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Underhill, R. (1975). Economic and political antecedents of monotheism: a cross-cultural study. The American Journal of Sociology, 80, 841–861.
Worthman, C. M. (2010). The ecology of human development: evolving models for cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 546–562.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Dr. Rie Goto, University of Cambridge, for valuable insight into the statistical analyses, and four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM. 1
(DOCX 47.2 kb)
Appendices
The World Cultures CD is available from W. Divale at divalebill@aol.com
Appendix A: Codes and Variable Numbers for the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample (SCCS) (Murdock and White 1980) on the World Cultures CD (Divale 2007)
The World Cultures CD is available from W. Divale at divalebill@aol.com
Dependent Variable
We created our dependent variable High Gods by recoding Murdock’s (1967) “High Gods” variable (v34 in the EA, and v238 in the SCCS) defined following Swanson (1960) as “a spiritual being who is believed to have created all reality and/or to be its ultimate governor, even though his sole act was to create other spirits who, in turn, created or control the natural world” (Murdock 1967:160).
The values of v238 are (1) absent or not reported; (2) present but not active in human affairs); (3) present and active in human affairs, but not supportive of human morality; (4) present, active, and specifically supportive of human morality. We recoded values 3 and 4 into value 3, thus creating an ordinal variable we call High Gods with three values: (1) absent; (2) inactive; (3) active or moral. We did this in order to focus our study on active gods, whether moral or not, and for statistical purposes (the original value 3 had only 13 cases). Our sample includes all 168 societies from the SCCS that are coded for v238.
Independent Variables
Mode of Subsistence was coded as four categories using v1, v3, and v5 Subsistence Economy and Supportive Practices (Murdock and Morrow 1970) and v858 Subsistence Type (D. R. White after Paige and Paige 1981) as follows:
-
1.
Foragers were defined as those whose contribution to the local food supply is <10% agriculture (v3 <4), <10% animal husbandry (v5 <4), and trade accounting for <50% and no more than the contribution of any other single subsistence source (v1 <6). We excluded mounted hunters (v858 = 5).
-
2.
Pastoralists were those using pastoralism and mounted hunting (v858 = 5 [Mounted Hunting] or v858 = 6 [Pastoralism >33%]). We counted mounted hunters as pastoralists so our forager sample would better approximate pre-agriculture.
-
3.
Horticulturalists included v858 = 7–10 [7 = Shifting Cultivation with digging sticks or wooden hoes, 8 = Shifting Cultivation with metal hoes, 9 = Horticultural Gardens or Tree Fruits, 10 = Advanced Horticulture with metal hoes], and foragers who rely on trade for >50% of their subsistence [v1 >4].
-
4.
Intensive Agriculturalists were defined as v858 = 11 [Intensive Agriculture with no plow] or 12 [Intensive Agriculture with plow]) (Porter and Marlowe 2007).
Total Population is v1122 log10 of Total Population (Murdock and White 1969) recoded as (1) = 1–2 (10–999); (2) = 3 (1,000–9,999); (3) = 4 (10,000–99,999); and (4) = 5–8 (100,000–999,999,999). We collapsed the eight ranked population sizes into four ranks for two reasons. First, some of the original ranks had few cases. And second, the four ranks represent reasonable thresholds of social complexity.
Social Stratification is a ranked variable created from v158 Social Stratification (Murdock and Provost 1973) and v270 Class Stratification (Murdock 1967) in order to measure the degree of change in stratification more clearly than either of the individual variables did. The rankings are as follows: (1) Egalitarian (v158 = 1 [Egalitarian]); (2) Wealth Distinctions (v270 = 2 [Wealth Distinctions] or v158 = 2 [Hereditary Slavery]); (3) Social Classes (v158 = 3 [2 Social Classes] or v270 >2 [Castes]).
Related independent variables are Dependence on: Gathering v203; Hunting v204; Fishing v205; Animal Husbandry v206; and Agriculture v207 (Murdock 1967).
Statistical software was PASW Statistics GradPack 17.0 for Windows, SPSS, Inc. 2009.
Appendix B
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peoples, H.C., Marlowe, F.W. Subsistence and the Evolution of Religion. Hum Nat 23, 253–269 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-012-9148-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-012-9148-6