Skip to main content
Log in

Male bumble bees are important pollinators of a late-blooming plant

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differences in the pollinator performance of flower visitor sexes are rarely considered. In bumble bees, males differ from workers in morphology and behaviour in ways that may affect their contribution to pollination. We compared the abundance, foraging behaviour, and pollen transfer ability of worker and male bumble bees on late-blooming Gentiana parryi (Gentianaceae) in subalpine meadows of the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Male bees mostly outnumbered female workers throughout blooming of the gentian. Males and workers foraged similarly, though individual males were more faithful to small foraging areas than workers. During single flower visits, males and workers caused similar levels of pollen deposition and seed production, yet female bees left fewer pollen grains in anthers to be transferred to other stigmas in the plant population. Overall, male bumble bees are common and capable pollinators of G. parryi and in some years and sites could be more important than workers. Male bumble bees may be important but unrecognized pollinators of other late-season plant species, and animal sexes may differ in their pollinator performance in other systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agosta SJ, Janzen DH (2005) Body size distributions of large Costa Rican dry forest moths and the underlying relationship between plant and pollinator morphology. Oikos 108:183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alarcón R, Riffell JA, Davidowitz G, Hildebrand JG, Bronstein JL (2010) Sex-dependent variation in the floral preferences of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. Anim Behav 80:289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alford DV (1975) Bumblebees. Davis-Poynter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker BM, Walker S (2013) Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package, version 1.0–5. http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/

  • Bertsch A (1984) Foraging in male bumblebees (Bombus lucorum L.): Maximizing energy or minimizing water load? Oecologia 62:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M et al (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG (1997) Sex ratios in bumble bees. Philos T Roy Soc B 352:1921–1933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain C, Williams N, Kremen C, Klein AM (2013) Synergistic effects of non-Apis bees and honey bees for pollination services. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:20122767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH, Sampson BJ, Miller SA (2011) Pollination value of male bees: the specialist bee Peponapis pruinosa (Apidae) at summer squash (Cucurbita pepo). Environ Entomol 40:614–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos MC, Wilson P, Thomson JD (2003) Pollen transfer by hummingbirds and bumblebees, and the divergence of pollination modes in Penstemon. Evolution 57:2742–2752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colla SR, Dumesh S (2010) The bumble bees of southern Ontario: notes on natural history and distribution. J Entomol Soc Ont 141:38–67

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jager ML, Ellis AG (2012) Gender-specific pollinator preference for floral traits. Funct Ecol 26:1197–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del Castillo RC, Fairbairn DJ (2011) Macroevolutionary patterns of bumblebee body size: detecting the interplay between natural and sexual selection. Ecol Evol 2:46–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dressler RL (1968) Pollination by euglossine bees. Evolution 22:202–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R et al (2013) Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339:1608–1611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskett AC (2011) Orchid pollination by sexual deception: pollinator perspectives. Biol Rev 86:33–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gögler J, Stökl J, Sramkova A et al (2009) Ménage à trois—two endemic species of deceptive orchids and one pollinator species. Evolution 63:2222–2234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D (2010) Bumblebees: behaviour, ecology, and conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harder LD, Wilson WG (1998) Theoretical consequences of heterogeneous transport conditions for pollen dispersal by animals. Ecology 79:2789–2807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1976) The foraging specializations of individual bumblebees. Ecol Monogr 46:105–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1987) Components of pollinator “quality”: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennersten O, Morse DH, O’Neil P (1991) Movements of male and worker bumblebees on and between flowers. Oikos 62:319–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns CA, Thomson JD (2001) The natural history of bumblebees. University Press of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus FB, Wolf S, Moritz RFA (2009) Male flight distance and population substructure in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. J Anim Ecol 78:247–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (2000) The bees of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Motten AF, Campbell DR, Alexander DE, Miller HL (1981) Pollination effectiveness of specialist and generalist visitors to a North Carolina population of Claytonia virginica. Ecology 62:1278–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie JE (2014) Bee foraging in space and time: linking individual behaviour to pollination. PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto, Canada

  • Osborne JL, Williams IH (2001) Site constancy of bumble bees in an experimentally patchy habitat. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostevik KL, Manson JS, Thomson JD (2010) Pollination potential of male bumble bees (Bombus impatiens): movement patterns and pollen-transfer efficiency. J Poll Ecol 2:21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier L, McNeil JN (2003) The effect of food supplementation on reproductive success in bumblebee field colonies. Oikos 103:688–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A (1996) The natural history of pollination. Timber Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Prŷs-Jones OE, Corbet SA (2011) Bumblebees. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1978) Optimal foraging in bumblebees and coevolution with their plants. Oecologia 36:281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Inouye DW, Thomson JD (2011) Activity and abundance of bumble bees near Crested Butte, Colorado: diel, seasonal, and elevation effects. Ecol Entomol 36:511–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/

  • Ranta E, Lundberg H (1981) Resource utilization by bumblebee queens, workers and males in a subarctic area. Ecography 4:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahli HF, Conner JK (2007) Visitation, effectiveness, and efficiency of 15 genera of visitors to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 94:203–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skaug H, Fournier A, Nielsen A, Magnusson A, Bolker BM (2011) glmmADMB: generalized linear mixed models using AD model builder. R Package, version 0.7. http://glmmadmb.r-forge.r-project.org, http://admb-project.org

  • Sladen FW (1912) The humble-bee, its life-history and how to domesticate it. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles EW (1979) Evolution of colour pattern and pubescence characteristics in male bumblebees: automimicry vs. thermoregulation. Evolution 33:941–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson BG (1979) Patrolling behavior of bumble bee males (Hymenoptera, Apidae) in a subalpine-alpine area, Swedish Lapland. Zoon 7:67–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Temeles EJ, Kress WJ (2003) Adaptation in a plant-hummingbird association. Science 300:630–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD (1981) Field measures of flower constancy in bumblebees. Am Midl Nat 105:377–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD (1986) Pollen transport and deposition by bumble bees in Erythronium: influences of floral nectar and bee grooming. J Ecol 74:329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Goodell K (2001) Pollen removal and deposition by honeybee and bumblebee visitors to apple and almond flowers. J Appl Ecol 38:1032–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Plowright RC (1980) Pollen carryover, nectar rewards, and pollinator behaviour with special reference to Diervilla lonicera. Oecologia 46:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Forrest JRK, Ogilvie JE (2011) Pollinator exclusion devices permitting easy access to flowers of small herbaceous plants. J Poll Ecol 4:24–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Vereecken NJ, Dorchin A, Dafni A, Hötling S, Schulz S, Watts S (2013) A pollinators’ eye view of a shelter mimicry system. Ann Bot 111:1155–1165

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittall JB, Hodges SA (2007) Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers. Nature 447:706–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson P, Thomson JD (1991) Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen. Ecology 72:1503–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf S, Moritz RFA (2014) The pollination potential of free-foraging bumblebee (Bombus spp.) males (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Apidologie 45:440–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf S, Toev T, Moritz RLV, Moritz RFA (2012) Spatial and temporal dynamics of the male effective population size in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Popul Ecol 54:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the RMBL for field support, especially Jennie Reithel and billy barr; Brett Harris for field help; and Kareem Jarrah, Sarah Kim, and Patricia Lee for help with laboratory work. We are grateful to Jessica Forrest, Ben Gilbert, Takashi Makino, Randy Mitchell, Ali Parker, and an anonymous reviewer, for helpful discussion or manuscript comments. We also thank Neal Williams and his laboratory for assistance and use of the particle counter, and Megan Frederickson and her laboratory for use of the dissecting microscope. This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant to JDT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane E. Ogilvie.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Lars Chittka.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 49 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogilvie, J.E., Thomson, J.D. Male bumble bees are important pollinators of a late-blooming plant. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 9, 205–213 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-015-9368-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-015-9368-x

Keywords

Navigation