Erratum to: J Am Oil Chem Soc (2015) 92:295–304 DOI 10.1007/s11746-014-2583-2

In the original publication of the article, the final sentence of the abstract was wrongly published as “silica was favorable for” instead of “silica was not favorable for”. The correct sentence should read as “The decrease in capacity was due to the reduction of alumina content, and the parallel formation of high amorphous silica was not favorable for the adsorption of anionic pigments, such as chlorophyll-a.”