Erratum to: J Surfact Deterg (2014) 17:727–732 DOI 10.1007/s11743-013-1558-x

In order to prove the accuracy of the molecular structure, we have operated a high resolution mass spectrometry and elemental analysis data. HRMS Calcd for C38H72N2O6Na+ [M+Na+]: 675.5283; Found: 675.5282. Elemental analysis form C38H72N2O6. Found 69.51 % C, 4.17 % N, 11.16 % H; requires 69.90 % C, 4.29 % N, 11.11 % H. Moreover, we also get the 1H and 13C NMR spectrometry data of the sodium salt of this product in D2O, 1H-NMR (400 MHz, D2O): 0.74–0.75 (m, 6H), 1.16–1.28 (br, 46H), 1.43 (br, 6H), 2.19–2.51 (m, 6H), 2.96–3.39 (m, 4H). 13C NMR spectrum of (100 MHz, D2O) showed four peaks at 174.3, 177.4, 180.4, 183.3 ppm. We have not shown the absolute configuration of two chiral centers in the molecule, which means the existence of isomers is positive. Therefore, in conclusion, the molecular structure can be proved to be correct through the newly data.

We recognize that we have made a few mistakes when the H-NMR spectrum was labeled, (but the mistake only for tagging the 1H NMR). We propose to delete our mistakes, and fill in our newly acquired data of HRMS and elemental analysis.

Such changes in the data will be made.

1H-NMR (400 MHz, D2O): 0.74–0.75 (m, 6H), 1.16–1.28 (br, 46H), 1.43 (br, 6H), 2.19–2.51 (m, 6H), 2.96–3.39 (m, 4H). 13C NMR spectrum of (100 MHz, D2O) showed four peaks at 174.3, 177.4, 180.4, 183.3 ppm, which means the existence of isomers is positive. HR-MS Calcd for C38H72N2O6Na+ [M+Na+]: 675.5283; Found: 675.5282. Elemental analysis: form C38H72N2O6. Found 69.51 % C, 4.17 % N, 11.16 % H; requires 69.90 % C, 4.29 % N, 11.11 % H.

The authors thank Dr. André Laschewsky for finding these mistakes.