Skip to main content
Log in

Gemini Surfactants Foam Formation Ability and Foam Stability Depends on Spacer Length

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents

Abstract

A series of cationic gemini surfactants containing different spacer length were synthesized and analyzed structurally. It was shown that the surface tension (σ) and critical micelle concentration (CMC), which had a maximum for the n-C4H8 spacer depended on the spacer length. The foaming ability and foam stability are high for the gemini surfactants with short spacers (C2H4 to n-C4H8), while longer spacers lead to a distinct decrease of these foam parameters. Foaming properties are discussed in terms of configuration and conformation of a surfactant molecule and in relation to micellization state kinetic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oh SG, Shah DO (1993) The effect of micellar lifetime on the rate of solubilization and detergency in sodium dodecyl sulfate solutions. J Am Oil Chem Soc 70:673–678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Patist A, Jha BK, Oh SG, Shah DO (1999) Importance of micellar relaxation time on detergent properties. J Surf Deterg 2:317–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oh SG, Shah DO (1991) Relationship between micellar lifetime and foamability of sodium dodecyl sulfate and sodium dodecyl sulfate/1-hexanol mixtures. Langmuir 7:1316–1318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Trzebicka B, Dworak A, Hawranke J, Kuliszewska E, Hordyjewicz-Baran Z (2013) Chapter 4: Micellization of Gemini Surfactants in Aqueous Solutions. In: Bradburn D, Bittinger T (eds) Micelles: Structural Biochemistry, Formation and Functions & Usage. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, pp 1–48. ISBN 978-1-62948-445-7

  5. Oelschlaeger C, Watson G, Candau SJ, Cates ME (2002) Structural, kinetics, and rheological properties of low ionic strength dilute solutions of a dimeric (gemini) surfactant. Langmuir 18:7265–7272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ulbricht W, Zana R (2001) Alkanediyl-α,ω-bis(dimethylalkylammonium bromide) surfactants: part 8. Pressure-jump study of the kinetics of micellar equilibria in aqueous solutions of alkanediyl-α,ω-bis(dimethyldodecylammonium bromide) surfactants. Coll Surf A 183–185:487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kern F, Lequeux F, Zana R, Candau SJ (1994) Dynamic properties of salt-free viscoelastic micellar solutions. Langmuir 10:1714–1723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Frindi M, Michels B, Levy H, Zana R (1994) Alkanediyl-α,ω-bis(dimethylalkylammonium bromide) surfactants. Part 4. Ultrasonic absorption studies of amphiphile exchange between micelles and bulk phase in aqueous micellar solution. Langmuir 10:1140–1145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zana R (2002) Dimeric (gemini) surfactants: effect of the spacer group on the association behavior in aqueous solution. J Coll Interface Sci 248:203–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Groth C, Nyden M, Holmber K, Kanicky JR, Shah DO (2004) Kinetics of the self-assembly of gemini surfactants. J Surf Deterg 7:247–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang QQ, Hong Q, Somasundaran P (2009) 1H NMR study of micelles formed by mixture of nonionic n-dodecyl-β-d-maltoside and cationic gemini surfactants. J Mol Liq 146:105–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Manger FM, Keiper JS (2000) Gemini surfactants. Angew Chem Int Ed 39:1906–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pozniak BP, Kuliszewska E (2013) Competition between substitution and elimination reaction channels from fragmentation ratios of diquaternary ammonium bromide and formate ion pairs. Int J Mass Spectrom 348:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zana R, Benrraou M, Rueff R (1991) Alkenediyl-α,ω-bis(dimethylalkylammonium bromide) surfactants. Part 1. Effect of the spacer chain length on the critical micelle concentration and micelle ionization degree. Langmuir 7:1072–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alami E, Beinert G, Marie P, Zana R (1993) Alkenediyl-α,ω-bis(dimethylalkylammonium bromide) surfactants. Part 3. Behavior at the air-water interface. Langmuir 9:1465–1467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tehrani-Bagha AR, Holmberg K (2010) Cationic ester-containing gemini surfactants: physical–chemical properties. Langmuir 26:9276–9282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Laschewsky A, Lunkenheimer K, Rakotoaly RH, Watterbled L (2005) Spacer effects in dimeric cationic surfactants. Coll Polym Sci 283:469–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pinoza A, Perez L, Infante MR, Franses EI (2001) Relation of foam stability to solution and surface properties of gemini cationic surfactants derived from arginine. Coll Surf A 189:225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We kindly acknowledge S. Felsinger for recording NMR measurements and A. Charciarek for performing the foamability tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edyta Kuliszewska.

About this article

Cite this article

Kuliszewska, E., Brecker, L. Gemini Surfactants Foam Formation Ability and Foam Stability Depends on Spacer Length. J Surfact Deterg 17, 951–957 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-014-1582-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-014-1582-5

Keywords

Navigation